scholarly journals 80 Improving Documentation of DNAR Decisions on the Acute Medical Take

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
A Sweeney ◽  
H Bellenberg ◽  
H Butt ◽  
S Badat ◽  
D Epstein

Abstract Introduction The BMA, Resuscitation Council and Royal College of Nursing have set out clear guidelines on documentation of Resuscitation discussions and decisions.1 On the acute medical take documentation of these discussions and decisions can be unclear despite use of an electronic patient record (EPR). The aim of this audit was to improve documentation of Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) decisions in EPR. Methods We listed patients admitted on the medical take over 1-week, looking at resuscitation status and the documentation of the DNAR decision. We then implemented a change to the format of the EPR treatment escalation plan (TEP) form. Prior to the change the DNAR form was behind the TEP form which had to be clicked on separately and was not mandatory to complete. After the intervention the DNAR decision was placed in a box on the front page of the TEP form to ensure that it was clear and accessible. Results Pre-intervention we reviewed 114 patients notes of which 94 were DNAR. Of these 94 only 17 (18%) had correctly documented DNAR decisions in EPR. Following the intervention we again looked at all admissions to the medical take over a 1-week period, out of 151 patients 75 were DNAR and of these 75 patients 29 had correctly documented DNAR forms. This shows an increase in the percentage of the DNAR decisions filled in from 18% to 39%. Conclusion The results show that although there has been an improvement in the number of DNAR decisions being documented there are still a large percentage of patients who do not have this correctly documented. We are designing further interventions to ensure that the DNAR documentation is marked as a mandatory part of the TEP form as well as educating around the importance of this documentation.

1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (02) ◽  
pp. 108-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Puerner ◽  
H. Soltanian ◽  
J. H. Hohnloser

AbstractData are presented on the use of a browsing and encoding utility to improve coded data entry for an electronic patient record system. Traditional and computerized discharge summaries were compared: during three phases of coding ICD-9 diagnoses phase I, no coding; phase II, manual coding, and phase III, computerized semiautomatic coding. Our data indicate that (1) only 50% of all diagnoses in a discharge summary are encoded manually; (2) using a computerized browsing and encoding utility this percentage may increase by 64%; (3) when forced to encode manually, users may “shift” as much as 84% of relevant diagnoses from the appropriate coding section to other sections thereby “bypassing” the need to encode, this was reduced by up to 41 % with the computerized approach, and (4) computerized encoding can improve completeness of data encoding, from 46 to 100%. We conclude that the use of a computerized browsing and encoding tool can increase data quality and the percentage of documented data. Mechanisms bypassing the need to code can be avoided.


2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 575-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander C. Newsham ◽  
Colin Johnston ◽  
Geoff Hall ◽  
Michael G. Leahy ◽  
Adam B. Smith ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 1230 ◽  
pp. 801-804
Author(s):  
J. Reponen ◽  
J. Niinimäki ◽  
T. Leinonen ◽  
J. Korpelainen ◽  
J. Oikarinen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima Rahman ◽  
Alan Hales ◽  
David Cable ◽  
Keith Burrill ◽  
Adrian Bateman ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Surgical and Cellular pathology (‘e-pathology’) record sets are a valuable data resource with which to populate the Electronic Patient Record (EPR). Accessible reports, even decades old, can be of great value in contemporary clinical decision making and as a resource for longitudinal clinical research. They commonly identify the operation, the location and the pathology, even if not to modern reporting standards. Methods Since 2010, we have built and implemented a timeline structured EPR for the ‘whole-of-life’ visualisation of the electronic documents (e-Docs) of 2.5M+ patients on our Master Index. Prior to this project, our earliest e-Docs dated to 1995. We tracked down 373,342 inert e-pathology reports from our legacy Ferranti (1990-1997) and Masterlab (1997-2004) systems. These were uploaded into our active file servers, following appropriate data quality and patient identity reconciliation checks. Results We have progressively restored 373,342 previously inaccessible e-pathology records to clinical use and to immediacy of access, and in the process extending our “addressable EPR” back to 1990 for living and deceased patients. This process has also allowed us to populate and validate an EPR-integral breast cancer data system of 20,000 cases with e-pathology records dating back to 1990. Conclusions The sustainable revitalisation of old e-pathology reports into a timeline structured EPR creates preserves and upcycles the investment in pathology reporting which is otherwise progressively lost to clinical use. E-pathology records provide reliable, life-long evidence of critical transition points in individual lives and disease progression for clinical and research use, when they can be instantly accessed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (S1) ◽  
pp. S60-S61
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Hughes ◽  
Anisa J.N. Jafar ◽  
Chrissy Alcock ◽  
Brigid Hayden ◽  
Philip Gaffney ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document