scholarly journals The length of a shortest closed geodesic on a surface of finite area

2020 ◽  
Vol 148 (12) ◽  
pp. 5355-5367
Author(s):  
I. Beach ◽  
R. Rotman
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Bart Michels

Abstract Given a closed geodesic on a compact arithmetic hyperbolic surface, we show the existence of a sequence of Laplacian eigenfunctions whose integrals along the geodesic exhibit nontrivial growth. Via Waldspurger’s formula we deduce a lower bound for central values of Rankin-Selberg L-functions of Maass forms times theta series associated to real quadratic fields.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-40
Author(s):  
YVES BENOIST ◽  
HEE OH

Abstract Let M be a geometrically finite acylindrical hyperbolic $3$ -manifold and let $M^*$ denote the interior of the convex core of M. We show that any geodesic plane in $M^*$ is either closed or dense, and that there are only countably many closed geodesic planes in $M^*$ . These results were obtained by McMullen, Mohammadi and Oh [Geodesic planes in hyperbolic 3-manifolds. Invent. Math.209 (2017), 425–461; Geodesic planes in the convex core of an acylindrical 3-manifold. Duke Math. J., to appear, Preprint, 2018, arXiv:1802.03853] when M is convex cocompact. As a corollary, we obtain that when M covers an arithmetic hyperbolic $3$ -manifold $M_0$ , the topological behavior of a geodesic plane in $M^*$ is governed by that of the corresponding plane in $M_0$ . We construct a counterexample of this phenomenon when $M_0$ is non-arithmetic.


1963 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Sparrow

A new representation for diffuse angle factors has been derived which replaces the usual area integrals by more tractable contour (i.e., line) integrals. The new formulation generally simplifies analytical calculation of angle factors. The advantages of the new representation are associated with the reduced order of the integrals (i.e., double reduced to single, quadruple reduced to double) which must be evaluated to calculate the angle factor. An additional benefit of the new representation is that integrals of simpler form are encountered than in the present representation. For the numerical evaluation of angle factors, the reduction in the order of the integrals should have great practical utility. In the case of energy exchange between an infinitesimal element and a finite area, a superposition theorem has been derived which permits results for certain basic surfaces to be linearly combined to yield angle factors for surfaces at other orientations. Several illustrations of the application of the new formulation are presented.


1992 ◽  
Vol 42 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 1537-1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott L. Gamble ◽  
Will W. Kochanski ◽  
Peter A. Irwin

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 1773-1839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara L. Aldana ◽  
Julie Rowlett

Abstract We consider finite area convex Euclidean circular sectors. We prove a variational Polyakov formula which shows how the zeta-regularized determinant of the Laplacian varies with respect to the opening angle. Varying the angle corresponds to a conformal deformation in the direction of a conformal factor with a logarithmic singularity at the origin. We compute explicitly all the contributions to this formula coming from the different parts of the sector. In the process, we obtain an explicit expression for the heat kernel on an infinite area sector using Carslaw–Sommerfeld’s heat kernel. We also compute the zeta-regularized determinant of rectangular domains of unit area and prove that it is uniquely maximized by the square.


1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 339-351
Author(s):  
Kerry N. Jones ◽  
Alan W. Reid

AbstractChinburg and Reid have recently constructed examples of hyperbolic 3-manifolds in which every closed geodesic is simple. These examples are constructed in a highly non-generic way and it is of interest to understand in the general case the geometry of and structure of the set of closed geodesics in hyperbolic 3-manifolds. For hyperbolic 3-manifolds which contain immersed totally geodesic surfaces there are always non-simple closed geodesics. Here we construct examples of manifolds with non-simple closed geodesics and no totally geodesic surfaces.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document