Elementary geometries underlying the theory of Euclidean connections on Finsler metrics of Lorentzian signature

1996 ◽  
pp. 301-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose G. Vargas ◽  
Douglas G. Torr
Keyword(s):  
Finsler Metrics ◽  
Lorentzian Signature

On the theory of $4$-th root Finsler metrics

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akbar Tayebi
Keyword(s):  
Finsler Metrics

scholarly journals Distributions in CFT. Part II. Minkowski space

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Petr Kravchuk ◽  
Jiaxin Qiao ◽  
Slava Rychkov
Keyword(s):  
Minkowski Space ◽  
Statistical Physics ◽  
Minimal Set ◽  
Local Commutativity ◽  
Classic Result ◽  
Lorentzian Signature ◽  
Open Question ◽  
Wightman Axioms ◽  
Euclidean Signature ◽  
3D Ising Model

Abstract CFTs in Euclidean signature satisfy well-accepted rules, such as the convergent Euclidean OPE. It is nowadays common to assume that CFT correlators exist and have various properties also in Lorentzian signature. Some of these properties may represent extra assumptions, and it is an open question if they hold for familiar statistical-physics CFTs such as the critical 3d Ising model. Here we consider Wightman 4-point functions of scalar primaries in Lorentzian signature. We derive a minimal set of their properties solely from the Euclidean unitary CFT axioms, without using extra assumptions. We establish all Wightman axioms (temperedness, spectral property, local commutativity, clustering), Lorentzian conformal invariance, and distributional convergence of the s-channel Lorentzian OPE. This is done constructively, by analytically continuing the 4-point functions using the s-channel OPE expansion in the radial cross-ratios ρ, $$ \overline{\rho} $$ ρ ¯ . We prove a key fact that |ρ|, $$ \left|\overline{\rho}\right| $$ ρ ¯ < 1 inside the forward tube, and set bounds on how fast |ρ|, $$ \left|\overline{\rho}\right| $$ ρ ¯ may tend to 1 when approaching the Minkowski space.We also provide a guide to the axiomatic QFT literature for the modern CFT audience. We review the Wightman and Osterwalder-Schrader (OS) axioms for Lorentzian and Euclidean QFTs, and the celebrated OS theorem connecting them. We also review a classic result of Mack about the distributional OPE convergence. Some of the classic arguments turn out useful in our setup. Others fall short of our needs due to Lorentzian assumptions (Mack) or unverifiable Euclidean assumptions (OS theorem).

scholarly journals Normal Form Near Orbit Segments of Convex Hamiltonian Systems

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahriar Aslani ◽  
Patrick Bernard
Keyword(s):  
Normal Form ◽  
Periodic Orbits ◽  
Hamiltonian Systems ◽  
Vector Fields ◽  
Energy Surface ◽  
Riemannian Metrics ◽  
Riemannian Metric ◽  
The Other ◽  
Finsler Metrics ◽  
The One

Abstract In the study of Hamiltonian systems on cotangent bundles, it is natural to perturb Hamiltonians by adding potentials (functions depending only on the base point). This led to the definition of Mañé genericity [ 8]: a property is generic if, given a Hamiltonian $H$, the set of potentials $g$ such that $H+g$ satisfies the property is generic. This notion is mostly used in the context of Hamiltonians that are convex in $p$, in the sense that $\partial ^2_{pp} H$ is positive definite at each point. We will also restrict our study to this situation. There is a close relation between perturbations of Hamiltonians by a small additive potential and perturbations by a positive factor close to one. Indeed, the Hamiltonians $H+g$ and $H/(1-g)$ have the same level one energy surface, hence their dynamics on this energy surface are reparametrisation of each other, this is the Maupertuis principle. This remark is particularly relevant when $H$ is homogeneous in the fibers (which corresponds to Finsler metrics) or even fiberwise quadratic (which corresponds to Riemannian metrics). In these cases, perturbations by potentials of the Hamiltonian correspond, up to parametrisation, to conformal perturbations of the metric. One of the widely studied aspects is to understand to what extent the return map associated to a periodic orbit can be modified by a small perturbation. This kind of question depends strongly on the context in which they are posed. Some of the most studied contexts are, in increasing order of difficulty, perturbations of general vector fields, perturbations of Hamiltonian systems inside the class of Hamiltonian systems, perturbations of Riemannian metrics inside the class of Riemannian metrics, and Mañé perturbations of convex Hamiltonians. It is for example well known that each vector field can be perturbed to a vector field with only hyperbolic periodic orbits, this is part of the Kupka–Smale Theorem, see [ 5, 13] (the other part of the Kupka–Smale Theorem states that the stable and unstable manifolds intersect transversally; it has also been studied in the various settings mentioned above but will not be discussed here). In the context of Hamiltonian vector fields, the statement has to be weakened, but it remains true that each Hamiltonian can be perturbed to a Hamiltonian with only non-degenerate periodic orbits (including the iterated ones), see [ 11, 12]. The same result is true in the context of Riemannian metrics: every Riemannian metric can be perturbed to a Riemannian metric with only non-degenerate closed geodesics, this is the bumpy metric theorem, see [ 1, 2, 4]. The question was investigated only much more recently in the context of Mañé perturbations of convex Hamiltonians, see [ 9, 10]. It is proved in [ 10] that the same result holds: if $H$ is a convex Hamiltonian and $a$ is a regular value of $H$, then there exist arbitrarily small potentials $g$ such that all periodic orbits (including iterated ones) of $H+g$ at energy $a$ are non-degenerate. The proof given in [ 10] is actually rather similar to the ones given in papers on the perturbations of Riemannian metrics. In all these proofs, it is very useful to work in appropriate coordinates around an orbit segment. In the Riemannian case, one can use the so-called Fermi coordinates. In the Hamiltonian case, appropriate coordinates are considered in [ 10,Lemma 3.1] itself taken from [ 3, Lemma C.1]. However, as we shall detail below, the proof of this Lemma in [ 3], Appendix C, is incomplete, and the statement itself is actually wrong. Our goal in the present paper is to state and prove a corrected version of this normal form Lemma. Our proof is different from the one outlined in [ 3], Appendix C. In particular, it is purely Hamiltonian and does not rest on the results of [ 7] on Finsler metrics, as [ 3] did. Although our normal form is weaker than the one claimed in [ 10], it is actually sufficient to prove the main results of [ 6, 10], as we shall explain after the statement of Theorem 1, and probably also of the other works using [ 3, Lemma C.1].

scholarly journals Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanato Goto ◽  
Thomas Hartman ◽  
Amirhossein Tajdini
Keyword(s):  
Black Holes ◽  
Black Hole ◽  
Path Integral ◽  
Island Rule ◽  
Technical Challenge ◽  
Local Boundary ◽  
Lorentzian Signature ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
Non Local ◽  
Non Local Equations

Abstract Quantum extremal islands reproduce the unitary Page curve of an evaporating black hole. This has been derived by including replica wormholes in the gravitational path integral, but for the transient, evaporating black holes most relevant to Hawking’s paradox, these wormholes have not been analyzed in any detail. In this paper we study replica wormholes for black holes formed by gravitational collapse in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, and confirm that they lead to the island rule for the entropy. The main technical challenge is that replica wormholes rely on a Euclidean path integral, while the quantum extremal islands of an evaporating black hole exist only in Lorentzian signature. Furthermore, the Euclidean equations for the Schwarzian mode are non-local, so it is unclear how to connect to the local, Lorentzian dynamics of an evaporating black hole. We address these issues with Schwinger-Keldysh techniques and show how the non-local equations reduce to the local ‘boundary particle’ description in special cases.

On Homogeneous Weakly Stretch Finsler Metrics

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hosein Tondro Vishkaei ◽  
Megerdich Toomanian ◽  
Reza Chavosh Katamy ◽  
Mehdi Nadjafikhah
Keyword(s):  
Finsler Metrics

PROJECTIVELY FLAT FINSLER METRICS WITH ALMOST ISOTROPIC S-CURVATURE

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyue Cheng ◽  
Zhongmin Shen
Keyword(s):  
Finsler Metrics ◽  
Projectively Flat

A geometric approach to quantum circuit lower bounds

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Geometric Approach ◽  
Quantum Circuit ◽  
Geodesic Equation ◽  
Initial Position ◽  
Minimal Length ◽  
Finsler Metric ◽  
Finsler Metrics ◽  
Minimal Size ◽  
Circuit Lower Bounds

What is the minimal size quantum circuit required to exactly implement a specified n-qubit unitary operation, U, without the use of ancilla qubits? We show that a lower bound on the minimal size is provided by the length of the minimal geodesic between U and the identity, I, where length is defined by a suitable Finsler metric on the manifold SU(2^n). The geodesic curves on these manifolds have the striking property that once an initial position and velocity are set, the remainder of the geodesic is completely determined by a second order differential equation known as the geodesic equation. This is in contrast with the usual case in circuit design, either classical or quantum, where being given part of an optimal circuit does not obviously assist in the design of the rest of the circuit. Geodesic analysis thus offers a potentially powerful approach to the problem of proving quantum circuit lower bounds. In this paper we construct several Finsler metrics whose minimal length geodesics provide lower bounds on quantum circuit size. For each Finsler metric we give a procedure to compute the corresponding geodesic equation. We also construct a large class of solutions to the geodesic equation, which we call \emph{Pauli geodesics}, since they arise from isometries generated by the Pauli group. For any unitary U diagonal in the computational basis, we show that: (a) provided the minimal length geodesic is unique, it must be a Pauli geodesic; (b) finding the length of the minimal Pauli geodesic passing from I to U is equivalent to solving an exponential size instance of the closest vector in a lattice problem (CVP); and (c) all but a doubly exponentially small fraction of such unitaries have minimal Pauli geodesics of exponential length.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document