scholarly journals Higher depth mock theta functions and q-hypergeometric series

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Males ◽  
Andreas Mono ◽  
Larry Rolen
Keyword(s):  
Theta Function ◽  
Modular Forms ◽  
Hypergeometric Series ◽  
Theta Functions ◽  
Mock Theta Function ◽  
Mock Theta Functions ◽  
Maass Forms ◽  
Mock Modular Forms ◽  
Harmonic Maass Forms

Abstract In the theory of harmonic Maaß forms and mock modular forms, mock theta functions are distinguished examples which arose from q-hypergeometric examples of Ramanujan. Recently, there has been a body of work on higher depth mock modular forms. Here, we introduce distinguished examples of these forms, which we call higher depth mock theta functions, and develop q-hypergeometric expressions for them. We provide three examples of mock theta functions of depth two, each arising by multiplying a classical mock theta function with a certain specialization of a universal mock theta function. In addition, we give their modular completions, and relate each to a q-hypergeometric series.

scholarly journals Higher pullbacks of modular forms on orthogonal groups

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Williams
Keyword(s):  
Modular Forms ◽  
Differential Operators ◽  
Jacobi Form ◽  
Siegel Modular Forms ◽  
Orthogonal Groups

Abstract We apply differential operators to modular forms on orthogonal groups O ⁢ ( 2 , ℓ ) {\mathrm{O}(2,\ell)} to construct infinite families of modular forms on special cycles. These operators generalize the quasi-pullback. The subspaces of theta lifts are preserved; in particular, the higher pullbacks of the lift of a (lattice-index) Jacobi form ϕ are theta lifts of partial development coefficients of ϕ. For certain lattices of signature ( 2 , 2 ) {(2,2)} and ( 2 , 3 ) {(2,3)} , for which there are interpretations as Hilbert–Siegel modular forms, we observe that the higher pullbacks coincide with differential operators introduced by Cohen and Ibukiyama.

scholarly journals Mocking the u-plane integral

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Korpas ◽  
Jan Manschot ◽  
Gregory W. Moore ◽  
Iurii Nidaiev
Keyword(s):  
Asymptotic Behavior ◽  
Gauge Theory ◽  
Entire Function ◽  
Gauge Group ◽  
Strong Coupling ◽  
Modular Forms ◽  
Correlation Functions ◽  
Coulomb Branch ◽  
Mock Modular Forms ◽  
Donaldson Invariants

AbstractThe u-plane integral is the contribution of the Coulomb branch to correlation functions of $${\mathcal {N}}=2$$ N = 2 gauge theory on a compact four-manifold. We consider the u-plane integral for correlators of point and surface observables of topologically twisted theories with gauge group $$\mathrm{SU}(2)$$ SU ( 2 ) , for an arbitrary four-manifold with $$(b_1,b_2^+)=(0,1)$$ ( b 1 , b 2 + ) = ( 0 , 1 ) . The u-plane contribution equals the full correlator in the absence of Seiberg–Witten contributions at strong coupling, and coincides with the mathematically defined Donaldson invariants in such cases. We demonstrate that the u-plane correlators are efficiently determined using mock modular forms for point observables, and Appell–Lerch sums for surface observables. We use these results to discuss the asymptotic behavior of correlators as function of the number of observables. Our findings suggest that the vev of exponentiated point and surface observables is an entire function of the fugacities.

scholarly journals Partial theta functions and mock modular forms as q-hypergeometric series

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 295-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Bringmann ◽  
Amanda Folsom ◽  
Robert C. Rhoades
Keyword(s):  
Modular Forms ◽  
Hypergeometric Series ◽  
Theta Functions ◽  
Mock Modular Forms ◽  
Partial Theta Functions

scholarly journals p-adic coupling of mock modular forms and shadows

2010 ◽  
Vol 107 (14) ◽  
pp. 6169-6174 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Guerzhoy ◽  
Z. A. Kent ◽  
K. Ono
Keyword(s):  
Modular Forms ◽  
Mock Modular Forms
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document