Completely reducible modules. Galois theory for the ring of linear transformations

1982 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1097-1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Wolf

Let V ≠ 0 be a vector space of dimension n over a finite field of order qm for a prime q. Of course, GL(n, qm) denotes the group of -linear transformations of V. With few exceptions, GL(n, qm) is non-solvable. How large can a solvable subgroup of GL(n, qm) be? The order of a Sylow-q-subgroup Q of GL(n, qm) is easily computed. But Q cannot act irreducibly nor completely reducibly on V.Suppose that G is a solvable, completely reducible subgroup of GL(n, qm). Huppert ([9], Satz 13, Satz 14) bounds the order of a Sylow-q-subgroup of G, and Dixon ([5], Corollary 1) improves Huppert's bound. Here, we show that |G| ≦ q3nm = |V|3. In fact, we show thatwhere


1966 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 485-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisao Tominaga

In 1952, the late Professor T. Nakayama succeeded in constructing the Galois theory for finite dimensional simple ring extensions [7]. And, we believe, the theory was essentially due to the following proposition: If a simple ring A is Galois and finite over a simple subring B then A is B′-A-completely reducible for any simple intermediate ring B′ of A/B [7, Lemmas 1.1 and 1.2]. Moreover, as was established in [5], Nakayama’s idea was still efficient in considering the infinite dimensional Galois theory of simple rings.


Author(s):  
Julio R. Bastida ◽  
Roger Lyndon

1972 ◽  
pp. 243-266
Author(s):  
R. Kochendörffer
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Clemens Birklbauer ◽  
David C. Schedl ◽  
Oliver Bimber

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document