scholarly journals A Qualitative Study of How Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Use an Electronic Stand-Alone Personal Health Record

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin T. Fuji ◽  
Amy A. Abbott ◽  
Kimberly A. Galt
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. van Vugt ◽  
M. de Wit ◽  
F. Sieverink ◽  
Y. Roelofsen ◽  
S. H. Hendriks ◽  
...  

We studied the use, uptake, and effects of e-Vita, a personal health record, with self-management support and personalized asynchronized coaching, for type 2 diabetes patients treated in primary care. Patients were invited by their practice nurse to join the study aimed at testing use and effects of a personal health record. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Uptake and usage were monitored using log data. Outcomes were self-reported diabetes self-care, diabetes-related distress, and emotional wellbeing. Patients’ health status was collected from their medical chart. 132 patients agreed to participate in the study of which less than half (46.1%) did not return to the personal health record after 1st login. Only 5 patients used the self-management support program within the personal health record, 3 of whom asked a coach for feedback. Low use of the personal health record was registered. No statistical significant differences on any of the outcome measures were found between baseline and 6 month follow-up. This study showed minimal impact of implementing a personal health record including self-management support in primary diabetes care. Successful adoption of web-based platforms, as ongoing patient centered care, is hard to achieve without additional strategies aimed at enhancing patient motivation and engaging professionals.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Floor Sieverink ◽  
Saskia M. Kelders ◽  
Louise M. A. Braakman-Jansen ◽  
Julia E. W. C. van Gemert-Pijnen

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Esmaeel Toni ◽  
Habibollah Pirnejad ◽  
Khadijeh Makhdoomi ◽  
Azam Mivefroshan ◽  
Zahra Niazkhani

Abstract Background To improve chronic disease outcomes, self-management is an effective strategy. An electronic personal health record (ePHR) is a promising tool with the potential to support chronic patient’s education, counseling, and self-management. Fitting ePHRs within the daily practices of chronic care providers and chronic patients requires user-centered design approaches. We aimed to understand users’ needs and requirements in chronic kidney disease (CKD) care to consider in the design of an ePHR to facilitate its implementation, adoption, and use. Methods A qualitative study was conducted in a major Iranian nephrology center including inpatient and outpatient settings in 2019. We conducted 28 semi-structured interviews with CKD patients, nurses, and adult nephrologists. To confirm or modify the requirements extracted from the interviews, a focus group was also held. Data were analyzed to extract especially those requirements that can facilitate implementation, adoption, and sustained use based on the PHR adoption model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Results Participants requested an ePHR that provides access to up to date patient information, facilitates patient-provider communication, and increases awareness about patient individualized conditions. Participants expected a system that is able to cater to low patient e-health literacy and high provider workload. They requested the ePHR to include purposeful documentation of medical history, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, tailored educational content, and scheduled care reminders. Messaging function, tailored educational content to individual patients’ conditions, and controlled access to information were highly valued in order to facilitate its implementation, adoption, and use. Conclusions We focused on the ePHR’s content and functionalities in the face of facilitators and/or barriers envisioned for its adoption in nephrology care. Designers and implementers should value CKD patients’ needs and requirements for self-management such as providing personalized education and counseling (on the basis of their condition and risk factors), health literacy, and disease progression levels. The socio-technical aspects of care also need further attention to facilitate ePHR’s adoption.


2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. e1-e1
Author(s):  
Carly Daley ◽  
Elizabeth Chen ◽  
Amelia Roebuck ◽  
Romisa Ghahari ◽  
Areej Sami ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
pp. 193229682110691
Author(s):  
Scott G. Cunningham ◽  
Andrew Stoddart ◽  
Sarah H. Wild ◽  
Nicholas J. Conway ◽  
Alastair M. Gray ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: My Diabetes My Way (MDMW) is Scotland’s interactive website and mobile app for people with diabetes and their caregivers. It contains multimedia resources for diabetes education and offers access to electronic personal health records. This study aims to assess the cost-utility of MDMW compared with routine diabetes care in people with type 2 diabetes who do not use insulin. Materials and Methods: Analysis used the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model 2. Clinical parameters of MDMW users (n = 2576) were compared with a matched cohort of individuals receiving routine care alone (n = 11 628). Matching criteria: age, diabetes duration, sex, and socioeconomic status. Impact on life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs of treatment and complications were simulated over ten years, including a 10% sensitivity analysis. Results: MDMW cohort: 1670 (64.8%) men; average age 64.3 years; duration of diabetes 5.5 years. 906 (35.2%) women: average age 61.6 years; duration 4.7 years. The cumulative mean QALY (95% CI) gain: 0.054 (0.044-0.062) years. Mean difference in cost: –£118.72 (–£150.16 to –£54.16) over ten years. Increasing MDMW costs (10%): –£50.49 (–£82.24-£14.14). Decreasing MDMW costs (10%): –£186.95 (–£218.53 to –£122.51). Conclusions: MDMW is “dominant” over usual care (cost-saving and life improving) in supporting self-management in people with type 2 diabetes not treated with insulin. Wider use may result in significant cost savings through delay or reduction of long-term complications and improved QALYs in Scotland and other countries. MDMW may be among the most cost-effective interventions currently available to support diabetes.


BMJ Open ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. e002931 ◽  
Author(s):  
John William Kerns ◽  
Alexander H Krist ◽  
Daniel R Longo ◽  
Anton J Kuzel ◽  
Steven H Woolf

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esmaeel Toni ◽  
Habibollah Pirnejad ◽  
Khadijeh Makhdoomi ◽  
Azam Mivefroshan ◽  
Zahra Niazkhani

Abstract Background To improve chronic disease outcomes, self-management is an effective strategy. An electronic Personal Health Record (ePHR) is a promising tool with the potential to support chronic patient’s education, counseling, and self-management. Fitting ePHRs within the daily practices of chronic care providers and chronic patients requires user-centered design approaches. We aimed to understand users’ needs and requirements in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) care to consider in the design of an ePHR to facilitate its implementation, adoption, and use.Methods A qualitative study was conducted in a major Iranian nephrology center including inpatient and outpatient settings in 2019. We conducted 28 semi-structured interviews with CKD patients, nurses, and adult nephrologists. To confirm or modify the requirements extracted from the interviews, a focus group was also held. Data were analyzed to extract those requirements that can facilitate implementation, adoption, and sustained use based on the PHR adoption model and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.Results Participants requested an ePHR that provides access to up to date patient information, facilitates patient-provider communication, and increases awareness about patient individualized conditions. Participants expected a system that is able to cater to low patient e-health literacy and high provider workload. They requested the ePHR to include purposeful documentation of medical history, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, tailored educational content, and scheduled care reminders. Messaging function, tailored educational content to individual patients’ conditions, and controlled access to information were highly valued in order to facilitate its implementation, adoption, and use. Conclusions We focused on the ePHR’s content and functionalities in the face of facilitators and/or barriers envisioned for the implementation and adoption of an ePHR in nephrology care. Different users' requirements should inform the design and implementation of ePHR system especially in the context of CKD care. The insights gained can help ePHR designers and implementers to better support CKD patients in self-management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document