Predicting Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules: Radiomics Score Versus 2017 American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System

Thyroid ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1024-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinyu Liang ◽  
Xiaowen Huang ◽  
Hangtong Hu ◽  
Yihao Liu ◽  
Qian Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Data System ◽  
Thyroid Imaging

Application of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in the Ultrasound Assessment of Thyroid Nodules According to Physician Experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Yeon Ko ◽  
Eun-Kyung Kim ◽  
Hee Jung Moon ◽  
Jung Hyun Yoon ◽  
Ha Yan Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Data System ◽  
Thyroid Imaging ◽  
Ultrasound Assessment

scholarly journals Risk of Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules Using the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in the NIFTP Era

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 735-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Rosario ◽  
Alexandre da Silva ◽  
Maurício Nunes ◽  
Michelle Borges
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Data System ◽  
Thyroid Neoplasm ◽  
Malignant Tumours ◽  
Thyroid Imaging ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Nuclear Features

AbstractRecently, the American College of Radiology (ACR) proposed a Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) for thyroid nodules based on ultrasonographic features. It is important to validate this classification in different centres. The present study evaluated the risk of malignancy in solid nodules>1 cm using ACR TI-RADS. The risk of malignancy was defined including noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) and after its exclusion from malignant tumours. For the present study, the original images were revised, and each nodule was assigned to one of the TI-RADS levels proposed for solid nodules: TR3, TR4, or TR5. This risk of malignancy was significantly different for the three levels: 1.7%, 11.2%, and 60.6% for TR3, TR4, and TR5, respectively, when NIFTP was included, and 0.6%, 7.9%, and 60.2% for TR3, TR4, and TR5, respectively, when NIFTP was excluded from malignant tumours. The nodules corresponding to NIFTP were classified according to ACR as TR3 in 28.5% of cases, TR4 in 67.8%, and TR5 in only 3.5%. The nodules corresponding to cancer were classified according to ACR as TR3 in only 2.3% of cases, TR4 in 27%, and TR5 in 70.5%. In conclusion, this study shows the validity of the ACR TI-RADS for solid thyroid nodules, even after the exclusion of NIFTP from malignant tumours.

Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI‐RADS) of the American College of Radiology (ACR) for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules >1 cm with indeterminate cytology

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 523-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiara Grossi Rocha ◽  
Pedro Weslley Rosario ◽  
Alexandre Lemos Silva ◽  
Maurício Buzelin Nunes ◽  
Maria Regina Calsolari
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Data System ◽  
Thyroid Imaging ◽  
Indeterminate Cytology

scholarly journals Correlation of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System [TI-RADS] and fine needle aspiration: experience in 1,000 nodules

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Rahal Junior ◽  
Priscila Mina Falsarella ◽  
Rafael Dahmer Rocha ◽  
João Paulo Bacellar Costa Lima ◽  
Matheus Jorge Iani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Data System ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Thyroid Imaging ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Bethesda Classification ◽  
The Bethesda System

ABSTRACT Objective To correlate the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and the Bethesda system in reporting cytopathology in 1,000 thyroid nodules. Methods A retrospective study conducted from November 2011 to February 2014 that evaluated 1,000 thyroid nodules of 906 patients who underwent ultrasound exam and fine needle aspiration. Results A significant association was found between the TI-RADS outcome and Bethesda classification (p<0.001). Most individuals with TI-RADS 2 or 3 had Bethesda 2 result (95.5% and 92.5%, respectively). Among those classified as TI-RADS 4C and 5, most presented Bethesda 6 (68.2% and 91.3%, respectively; p<0.001). The proportion of malignancies among TI-RADS 2 was 0.8%, and TI-RADS 3 was 1.7%. Among those classified as TI-RADS 4A, proportion of malignancies was 16.0%, 43.2% in 4B, 72.7% in 4C and 91.3% among TI-RADS 5 (p<0.001), showing clear association between TI-RADS and biopsy results. Conclusion The TI-RADS is appropriate to assess thyroid nodules and avoid unnecessary fine needle aspiration, as well as to assist in making decision about when this procedure should be performed.

scholarly journals Assessment of American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) for Pediatric Thyroid Nodules

Radiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 294 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle M. Richman ◽  
Carol B. Benson ◽  
Peter M. Doubilet ◽  
Ari J. Wassner ◽  
Elizabeth Asch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Data System ◽  
Thyroid Imaging

Malignancy risk of initially benign thyroid nodules: validation with various Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System guidelines

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Min Ha ◽  
Jung Hwan Baek ◽  
Young Jun Choi ◽  
Sae Rom Chung ◽  
Tae Yon Sung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Data System ◽  
Malignancy Risk ◽  
Thyroid Imaging ◽  
Benign Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Benign Thyroid
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document