High-Risk Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer T4 Primary Tumors Achieve Remnant Ablation Equally Well Using rhTSH or Thyroid Hormone Withdrawal

Thyroid ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 480-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Bartenstein ◽  
Elisa Caballero Calabuig ◽  
Carlo Ludovico Maini ◽  
Renzo Mazzarotto ◽  
M. Angustias Muros de Fuentes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Thyroid Hormone ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Remnant Ablation ◽  
Thyroid Hormone Withdrawal ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

The Influence of Age on Disease Outcome in 2015 ATA High Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evert F.s. van Velsen ◽  
Robin P. Peeters ◽  
Merel T. Stegenga ◽  
F.j. van Kemenade ◽  
Tessa M. van Ginhoven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Disease Outcome ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Stratification System ◽  
Risk Stratification System

Objective Recent research suggests that the addition of age improves the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) Risk Stratification System for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The aim of our study was to investigate the influence of age on disease outcome in ATA High Risk patients with a focus on differences between patients with papillary (PTC) and follicular thyroid cancer (FTC). Methods We retrospectively studied adult patients with High Risk DTC from a Dutch university hospital. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effects of age (at diagnosis) and several age cutoffs (per five years increment between 20 and 80 years) on (i) response to therapy, (ii) developing no evidence of disease (NED), (iii) recurrence, and (iv) disease specific mortality (DSM). Results We included 236 ATA High Risk patients (32% FTC) with a median follow-up of 6 years. Age, either continuously or dichotomously, had a significant influence on having an excellent response after initial therapy, developing NED, recurrence, and DSM for PTC and FTC. For FTC, an age cutoff of 65 or 70 years showed the best statistical model performance, while this was 50 or 60 years for PTC. Conclusions In a population of patients with High Risk DTC, older age has a significant negative influence on disease outcomes. Slightly different optimal age cutoffs were identified for the different outcomes, and these cutoffs differed between PTC and FTC. Therefore, the ATA Risk Stratification System may further improve should age be incorporated as an additional risk factor.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of 131I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (10) ◽  
pp. 3217-3225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Klubo-Gwiezdzinska ◽  
Douglas Van Nostrand ◽  
Frank Atkins ◽  
Kenneth Burman ◽  
Jacqueline Jonklaas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Background: The optimal management of high-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) consists of thyroidectomy followed by radioiodine (131I) therapy. The prescribed activity of 131I can be determined using two approaches: 1) empiric prescribed activity of 131I (E-Rx); and 2) dosimetry-based prescribed activity of 131I (D-Rx). Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the relative treatment efficacy and side effects of D-Rx vs. E-Rx. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with distant metastases and/or locoregionally advanced radioiodine-avid DTC who were treated with either D-Rx or E-Rx. Response to treatment was based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1 criteria. Results: The study group consisted of 87 patients followed for 51 ± 35 months, of whom 43 were treated with D-Rx and 44 with E-Rx. Multivariate analysis, controlling for age, gender, and status of metastases revealed that the D-Rx group tended to be 70% less likely to progress (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.087–1.02; P = 0.052) and more likely to obtain complete response (CR) compared to the E-Rx group (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–53.5; P = 0.029). There was an association in the D-Rx group between the observed CR and percentage of maximum tolerable activity given as a first treatment of 131I (P = 0.030). The advantage of D-Rx was specifically apparent in the locoregionally advanced group because CR was significantly higher in D-Rx vs. E-Rx in this group of patients (35.7 vs. 3.3%; P = 0.009). The rates of partial response, stable disease, and progression-free survival, as well as the frequency of side effects, were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: Higher efficacy of D-Rx with a similar safety profile compared to E-Rx supports the rationale for employing individually prescribed activity in high-risk patients with DTC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document