scholarly journals Temporal Analysis of Equine Bone Marrow Aspirate During Establishment of Putative Mesenchymal Progenitor Cell Populations

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine H. Radcliffe ◽  
M. Julia B.F. Flaminio ◽  
Lisa A. Fortier
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
Bone Marrow Aspirate ◽  
Temporal Analysis ◽  
Cell Populations ◽  
Mesenchymal Progenitor Cell ◽  
Equine Bone

scholarly journals Quantitation of progenitor cell populations and growth factors after bone marrow aspirate concentration

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Schäfer ◽  
Malcolm R. DeBaun ◽  
Erika Fleck ◽  
Christopher J. Centeno ◽  
Daniela Kraft ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Growth Factors ◽  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
Bone Marrow Aspirate ◽  
Cell Populations

Bone Marrow Niches for Skeletal Progenitor Cells and their Inhabitants in Health and Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marietta Herrmann ◽  
Franz Jakob
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
Adult Stem Cells ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Cell Populations ◽  
Surface Markers ◽  
Bone Marrow Niches

The bone marrow hosts skeletal progenitor cells which have most widely been referred to as Mesenchymal Stem or Stromal Cells (MSCs), a heterogeneous population of adult stem cells possessing the potential for self-renewal and multilineage differentiation. A consensus agreement on minimal criteria has been suggested to define MSCs in vitro, including adhesion to plastic, expression of typical surface markers and the ability to differentiate towards the adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic lineages but they are critically discussed since the differentiation capability of cells could not always be confirmed by stringent assays in vivo. However, these in vitro characteristics have led to the notion that progenitor cell populations, similar to MSCs in bone marrow, reside in various tissues. MSCs are in the focus of numerous (pre)clinical studies on tissue regeneration and repair.Recent advances in terms of genetic animal models enabled a couple of studies targeting skeletal progenitor cells in vivo. Accordingly, different skeletal progenitor cell populations could be identified by the expression of surface markers including nestin and leptin receptor. While there are still issues with the identity of, and the overlap between different cell populations, these studies suggested that specific microenvironments, referred to as niches, host and maintain skeletal progenitor cells in the bone marrow. Dynamic mutual interactions through biological and physical cues between niche constituting cells and niche inhabitants control dormancy, symmetric and asymmetric cell division and lineage commitment. Niche constituting cells, inhabitant cells and their extracellular matrix are subject to influences of aging and disease e.g. via cellular modulators. Protective niches can be hijacked and abused by metastasizing tumor cells, and may even be adapted via mutual education. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on bone marrow skeletal progenitor cell niches in physiology and pathophysiology. We discuss the plasticity and dynamics of bone marrow niches as well as future perspectives of targeting niches for therapeutic strategies.

Characterization of Adult Stem/Progenitor Cell Populations from Bone Marrow in a Three-Dimensional Collagen Gel Culture System

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2021-2032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Claros ◽  
Noela Rodríguez-Losada ◽  
Encarnación Cruz ◽  
Enrique Guerado ◽  
José Becerra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Culture System ◽  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Collagen Gel ◽  
Cell Populations ◽  
Collagen Gel Culture ◽  
Gel Culture

scholarly journals Identification of a bone marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cell subset that can contribute to the gastric epithelium

2009 ◽  
Vol 89 (12) ◽  
pp. 1410-1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Okumura ◽  
Sophie SW Wang ◽  
Shigeo Takaishi ◽  
Shui Ping Tu ◽  
Vivian Ng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
Cell Subset ◽  
Gastric Epithelium ◽  
Mesenchymal Progenitor Cell

scholarly journals Co-Transplantation of Bone Marrow-MSCs and Myogenic Stem/Progenitor Cells from Adult Donors Improves Muscle Function of Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1119
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Klimczak ◽  
Agnieszka Zimna ◽  
Agnieszka Malcher ◽  
Urszula Kozlowska ◽  
Katarzyna Futoma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy ◽  
Muscular Dystrophy ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Muscle Function ◽  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
Genetic Disorder ◽  
Cell Populations ◽  
Muscle Fibres

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a genetic disorder associated with a progressive deficiency of dystrophin that leads to skeletal muscle degeneration. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that a co-transplantation of two stem/progenitor cell populations, namely bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) and skeletal muscle-derived stem/progenitor cells (SM-SPCs), directly into the dystrophic muscle can improve the skeletal muscle function of DMD patients. Three patients diagnosed with DMD, confirmed by the dystrophin gene mutation, were enrolled into a study approved by the local Bioethics Committee (no. 79/2015). Stem/progenitor cells collected from bone marrow and skeletal muscles of related healthy donors, based on HLA matched antigens, were expanded in a closed MC3 cell culture system. A simultaneous co-transplantation of BM-MSCs and SM-SPCs was performed directly into the biceps brachii (two patients) and gastrocnemius (one patient). During a six-month follow-up, the patients were examined with electromyography (EMG) and monitored for blood kinase creatine level. Muscle biopsies were examined with histology and assessed for dystrophin at the mRNA and protein level. A panel of 27 cytokines was analysed with multiplex ELISA. We did not observe any adverse effects after the intramuscular administration of cells. The efficacy of BM-MSC and SM-SPC application was confirmed through an EMG assessment by an increase in motor unit parameters, especially in terms of duration, amplitude range, area, and size index. The beneficial effect of cellular therapy was confirmed by a decrease in creatine kinase levels and a normalised profile of pro-inflammatory cytokines. BM-MSCs may support the pro-regenerative potential of SM-SPCs thanks to their trophic, paracrine, and immunomodulatory activity. Both applied cell populations may fuse with degenerating skeletal muscle fibres in situ, facilitating skeletal muscle recovery. However, further studies are required to optimise the dose and timing of stem/progenitor cell delivery.

Mass Cytometric Analysis of AML Stem and Early Progenitor Cells Reveals Karyotype and Genotype-Specific Cell Cycle Properties That Correlate with Known Responses to Chemotherapy

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2359-2359
Author(s):  
Gregory K. Behbehani ◽  
Wendy J. Fantl ◽  
Bruno C Medeiros ◽  
Garry P. Nolan
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
S Phase ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Phase Fraction ◽  
Cell Populations

Abstract Introduction: Leukemic stem cells (LSCs) are recognized as important mediators of chemotherapy resistance and leukemia relapse. The postulated mechanism for this is the relative quiescence of these cell populations that renders them resistant to cytotoxic agents. This simple hypothesis, however, is supported almost entirely by indirect evidence, and fails to explain the large differences in relapse rates across different AML subtypes. To address this question, we have developed a mass cytometry (MCM) approach to assess the cell cycle of immunophenotypically complex primary samples from patients with AML. By processing samples immediately upon bone marrow harvest, we could determine if AML stem cells were quiescent in vivo and if the cell cycle properties of these cells varied between chemotherapy-responsive versus resistant AML subtypes. Methods: Bone marrow aspirates from 33 AML patients, 3 with APL, 2 with high-risk MDS, 5 with AML who achieved a CR with chemotherapy treatment, and 5 healthy donors (48 total samples) were incubated at 37°C for 15 minutes with 20uM Iodo-deoxyuridine (IdU) immediately after aspiration (<1 min), followed by fixation and storage. Samples were then analyzed with two overlapping 39-antibody MCM panels (50 markers total). Cellular barcoding was utilized to stain and analyze cells in tubes of 20 samples each, enabling direct comparison of samples to each other and to the healthy controls. Results: The high dimensionality of MCM enabled the simultaneous measurement of 25 surface markers and the identification of almost all immunophenotypic populations in human bone marrow. The use of barcoding, and the resultant ability to directly compare samples, enabled the detection of aberrant marker expression at very high resolution (2-3 fold changes). At least one surface marker aberrancy was detected in each AML sample. Unexpectedly, cell cycle analysis revealed that, compared to immunophenotypically similar normal cells, the average fraction of S-phase cells in AML samples was significantly lower. In both AML and healthy samples, the lowest S-phase fraction was found in fully differentiated populations and in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) while committed progenitor populations (myelo-monoblasts, promyelocytes, erythroblasts) exhibited the highest S-phase fraction. The HSC and early progenitor cell populations from patients with CBF AML (t(8;21) and inv(16)) demonstrated a significantly higher S-phase fraction than the same cell populations from the other AML samples (7.76% vs. 2.66%; p=0.0014). Furthermore, samples with FLT3-ITD mutations exhibited the lowest S-phase fraction in the HSC and early progenitor cell populations (0.63%), which was significantly lower than the S-phase fraction of the other AML samples (4.37%; p=9.3x10-4). Finally, a subset of patients (n=10) was being treated with hydroxyurea (HU) at the time of their bone marrow aspiration. The effect of HU treatment was manifest as a reduction in the IdU incorporation rate (with no change in S-phase fraction) in the cells of the treated patients. However, neither cell cycle arrest nor apoptosis were observed in these samples. This is in contrast with the commonly observed occurrence of both in leukemic cell lines treated in vitro with HU. Conclusions: By combining fresh sample processing with high-dimensional MCM analysis, we developed an innovative approach for the analysis of hematologic malignancies. Our results suggest that the relative sensitivity of CBF AML to cytotoxic chemotherapy may be the result of the increased fraction of S-phase cells within the HSC and early progenitor cell populations. Conversely, HSC and early progenitor cell populations from patients with FLT3-ITD mutations would be expected to be particularly resistant to cytarabine-based consolidation therapy due to the very low frequency of S-phase cells within these populations. This finding, combined with our observation that the stem and early progenitor cells from the FLT3-ITD samples have high expression of CD33, may provide a mechanistic explanation for the improved disease-free survival recently reported for FLT3-ITD AML patients treated with fractioned gemtuzumab ozogamicin in combination with standard therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures Behbehani: Fluidigm: Consultancy. Medeiros:Agios: Consulting - Ad board Other. Nolan:Fluidigm, Inc: Consultancy, Equity Ownership.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document