Effects of Two Diode Lasers With and Without Photosensitization on Contaminated Implant Surfaces: An Ex Vivo Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 347-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Alberto Valente ◽  
Thomas Mang ◽  
Michael Hatton ◽  
Lynn Mikulski ◽  
Sebastiano Andreana
Keyword(s):  
Ex Vivo ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Alberto Valente ◽  
Antonio Calascibetta ◽  
Giuseppe Patianna ◽  
Thomas Mang ◽  
Michael Hatton ◽  
...  

The aim of this study is to assess the increase of temperature following laser irradiation with 810 nm, 980 nm, and 1064 nm diode laser wavelengths, of an implant under conditions that more closely replicate those of the human body. A 4 × 14 mm machined surface implant was placed in a porcine rib to replicate the conductivity of heat given by the bone. A peri-implant vertical defect was made that was 2 mm wide and 2 mm deep to simulate bone resorption. Two thermocouples were positioned crestally and apically on the implant surface. The tip of the laser was kept 3 mm away from the surface and continuously moved in an up-and-down and side-to-side fashion, inside the defect for 60 seconds. Initial temperatures and the time needed to reach an increase of 10°C were recorded. The experiment was repeated at room temperature and in a 37°C water bath with the following settings: 0.6 W, 0.8 W, 1 W continuous and repeated in pulsed. A critical increase of temperature of more than 10°C is reached with all lasers at 0.8 W and 1 W in continuous mode at room temperature. Only the 1064 nm diode laser reached the critical increase at 0.8 W in pulsed mode. No critical increase of temperature was registered with other settings and when the bone block was placed in a 37°C water bath. The results of this study suggest that use of these diode lasers does not cause a harmful increase in temperature when used under conditions similar to those of the human body.


Author(s):  
Georgios E. Romanos ◽  
Upasna Malhotra ◽  
Rocco W. Tedesco ◽  
Wei Hou ◽  
Rafael Delgado-Ruiz

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Heiss ◽  
Frank W. Roemer ◽  
Christoph Lutter ◽  
Rolf Janka ◽  
Volker Schöffl ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Engelke ◽  
Nicolas Bouler ◽  
Oleg Museyko Fuerst ◽  
Sebastien Parratte ◽  
Thomas Fuerst ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 667-670
Author(s):  
Thomas Larrew ◽  
Mohammed Alshareef ◽  
Robert F. Murphy ◽  
Ramin Eskandari ◽  
Libby Kosnik Infinger

OBJECTIVEAlthough the advent of magnetic growing rod technology for scoliosis has provided a means to bypass multiple hardware lengthening operations, it is important to be aware that many of these same patients have a codiagnosis of hydrocephalus with magnet-sensitive programmable ventricular shunts. As the magnetic distraction of scoliosis rods has not previously been described to affect the shunt valve setting, the authors conducted an investigation to characterize the interaction between the two devices.METHODSIn this ex vivo study, the authors carried out 360 encounters between four different shunt valve types at varying distances from the magnetic external remote control (ERC) used to distract the growing rods. Valve settings were examined before and after every interaction with the remote control to determine if there was a change in the setting.RESULTSThe Medtronic Strata and Codman Hakim valves were found to have setting changes at distances of 3 and 6 inches but not at 12 inches. The Aesculap proGAV and Codman Certas valves, typically described as MRI-resistant, did not have any setting changes due to the magnetic ERC regardless of distance.CONCLUSIONSAlthough it is not necessary to check a shunt valve after every magnetic distraction of scoliosis growing rods, if there is concern that the magnetic ERC may have been within 12 inches (30 cm) of a programmable ventricular shunt valve, the valve should be checked at the bedside with a programmer or with a skull radiograph along with postdistraction scoliosis radiographs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document