Modeling of Community Integration Trajectories in the First Five Years after Traumatic Brain Injury

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nada Andelic ◽  
Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla ◽  
Paul B. Perrin ◽  
Solrun Sigurdardottir ◽  
Juan Lu ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Kent ◽  
◽  
Valerie Wright St Clair ◽  
Paula Kersten ◽  
◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 237796082098178
Author(s):  
Sumana Lama ◽  
Jintana Damkliang ◽  
Luppana Kitrungrote

Introduction Community integration is an essential component for rehabilitation among traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors, which yields positive outcomes in terms of social activities, community participation, and productive work. A factor that usually facilitates community integration among TBI survivors is social support, whereas physical environment and fatigue are most often found as barriers. Objectives This study aimed to (1) describe the level of community integration, fatigue, physical environment, and social support of persons after TBI, and (2) examine the relationship between community integration and these three factors. Methods This is a descriptive correlational study. One hundred and twenty TBI survivors living in the communities of Province Number Three, Nepal were enrolled using the stratified sampling technique. The data were collected using the Community Integration Questionnaire, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s correlation were used to analyze the data. Results Community integration, fatigue, and physical environment showed a moderate level, while social support revealed a high level. Fatigue was significantly correlated with overall community integration, whereas physical environment was found to correlate with two subscales of community integration, home integration and productive activities. Conclusion To enhance the level of community integration among TBI survivors, health care providers, in particular rehabilitation nurses and community nurses, should plan and implement strategies such as follow-up appointments or continued rehabilitation at home.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (08) ◽  
pp. 890-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison S. Binder ◽  
Katie Lancaster ◽  
Jean Lengenfelder ◽  
Nancy D. Chiaravalloti ◽  
Helen M. Genova

AbstractObjective: Individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) can experience social isolation, which is damaging to well-being and counterproductive to successful rehabilitation. It has been proposed that social cognitive deficits that commonly result from TBI may contribute to weakened social integration. However, the consequences of specific social cognitive deficits in TBI are still being delineated. The current work sought to better characterize the relationship between community integration and facial affect recognition (FAR) in TBI. Participants and Methods: A total of 27 participants with moderate to severe TBI and 30 healthy controls (HCs) completed two tests of FAR, which employed either static photographic stimuli or dynamic video stimuli (The Awareness of Social Inference Test). The Community Integration Questionnaire was also administered to participants. Results: Participants with TBI were significantly impaired on both the static and dynamic FAR measures, yet the deficits were most pronounced within the dynamic task. Furthermore, participants with TBI reported lower community integration compared with HCs. FAR was positively associated with community integration in both groups, such that participants with proficient affect recognition skills were better integrated into their communities. Conclusions: FAR deficits may contribute to the lack of community integration often observed in TBI; thus, interventions designed to improve FAR may be beneficial to this population’s ability to successfully reintegrate into society.


2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 426-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deirdre R. Dawson ◽  
Michelle Markowitz ◽  
Donald T. Stuss

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. E32-E41
Author(s):  
Jessica Kersey ◽  
Lauren Terhorst ◽  
Chao-Yi Wu ◽  
Elizabeth Skidmore

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 918-918
Author(s):  
Sullivan K ◽  
Hennessy M

Abstract Objective Little is known about the traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes for people returning to urban versus rural communities. These communities typically differ in terms of the availability of formal and informal supports. We compared patient-reported TBI outcomes for three communities (urban, rural, and remote) and modelled their predictors. Method Six hundred and sixty-two cases with mild-to-severe TBI were identified from hospital records. These individuals received a mail-out survey comprised of standardized outcome measures. The measures assessed: symptoms, quality-of-life, service obstacles, unmet needs, mental health, and community integration. Ninety-one people who were less than two years post-injury returned a usable survey (18% response rate). The location of communities was coded using the Accessibility Remoteness Index of Australia (urban n = 22, rural n = 43, remote n = 26). Results There were no differences in the outcomes due to location (p’s > .05). The significant individual predictors of five of the six outcomes were the participant’s sex, age, and the injury severity; but location did not play a role. TBI outcomes were typically worse if the injury was severe, or if the injured person was older or female. For one outcome (community integration) males fared worse than females. Conclusion Contrary to expectations, location did not affect patient-reported TBI outcomes. This could indicate that the same supports are available to patients, despite their location or; that the different supports were relied on to achieve the same outcomes. The overall findings urge continued investment in TBI rehabilitation, particularly for the subgroups that experienced the worst outcomes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 734-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott R. Millis ◽  
Sarah-Jane Meachen ◽  
Julie A. Griffen ◽  
Robin A. Hanks ◽  
Lisa J. Rapport

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document