Bursectomy Versus Nonbursectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center, Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Study in China

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengyu Hu ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Jiawei Zhang ◽  
Bo Chen ◽  
Xiangling Meng
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Gastric Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Matched Cohort Study

scholarly journals Impact of intensive care unit admission during handover on mortality: a propensity matched cohort study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thais Dias Midega ◽  
Newton Carlos Viana Leite Filho ◽  
Antônio Paulo Nassar ◽  
Roger Monteiro Alencar ◽  
Antônio Capone Neto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Matched Cohort Study

AbstractIntroductionHandover is a process of transferring information, responsibility and authority for providing care of critically ill patients from a departing intensivist to an oncoming intensivist. The effect of i admission during a medical handover on clinical outcomes is unknown.ObjectivesOur purpose was to evaluate the impact of ICU admission during a medical handover on clinical outcomes.MethodsPost hoc analysis of a cohort study addressing the effect of ICU admissions during the handover on outcomes. This retrospective, single center, propensity matched cohort study was conducted in a 41-bed open general ICU located in a private tertiary care hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Based on time of ICU admission, patients were categorized into two cohorts: handover group (ICU admission between 6:30 am to 7:30 or 6:30 pm to 7:30 pm) or control group (admission between 7:31 am to 6:29 pm or 7:31 pm to 6:29 am). Patients in the handover group were propensity matched to patients in the control group at 1:2 ratio. Our primary outcome was hospital mortality.ResultsBetween June 1, 2013 and May 31, 2015, 6,650 adult patients were admitted to the ICU. Following exclusion of ineligible participants, 5,779 patients [389 (6.7%) in handover group and 5390 (93.3%) in control group] were eligible for propensity score matching, of whom 1,166 were successfully matched [389 (33.4%) handover group and 777 (66.6%) in control group]. Before matching, hospital mortality was 14.1% (55/389 patients) in handover group compared to 11.7% (628/5,390) in control group (p=0.142). After propensity-score matching, ICU admission during handover was not associated with increased risk of ICU (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.11; p=0.11) and hospital (OR, 1.23; 95%CI, 0.85 to 1.75; p=0.26) mortality. ICU and hospital length of stay did not differ between the groups.ConclusionIn this propensity-matched single center cohort study, ICU admission during medical handover did not affect clinical outcomes.

ID: 3525809 COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES OF ENDOSCOPIC ERADICATION THERAPY FOR DYSPLASTIC BE USING RADIOREQUENCY ABLATION AND CRYOBALLON ABLATION: A MULTICENTER PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED COHORT STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. AB291-AB292
Author(s):  
Siddharth Agarwal ◽  
Mohammad Alshelleh ◽  
Jamie Scott ◽  
Lovekirat Dhaliwal ◽  
Don C. Codipilly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Eradication Therapy ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Matched Cohort Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document