Single-Incision Robotic Colectomy: Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes with Multiport Robotic Colectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-187
Author(s):  
Tung-Cheng Chang ◽  
Yu-Ting Chen ◽  
Min-Hsuan Yen ◽  
Kee-Thai Kiu
Keyword(s):  
Single Incision ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Robotic Colectomy

Short‐term and midterm outcomes of single‐incision laparoscopic surgery for right‐sided colon cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Ishii ◽  
Masashi Yahagi ◽  
Hiroki Ochiai ◽  
Hiroyuki Sako ◽  
Ryusuke Amemiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Short Term

Long-term and short-term surgical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic hepatectomy on anterolateral liver segments

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 2969-2979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuei-Yen Tsai ◽  
Hsin-An Chen ◽  
Wan-Yu Wang ◽  
Ming-Te Huang
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Laparoscopic Hepatectomy ◽  
Short Term

Single-Center Experience in Systemic Stress and Short-Term Morbidity of Single-Incision Cholecystectomy

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid Froghi ◽  
Mikael H. Sodergren ◽  
Victoria J. Wright ◽  
Ross Coomber ◽  
Alan P. Courtney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Systemic Stress

Minimization of Wound With the Assistance of a Needle Grasper in Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 536-544
Author(s):  
Beom-Jin Kim ◽  
Jong Won Kim ◽  
Yoo Shin Choi ◽  
Yong Gum Park ◽  
Beom Gyu Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Pain Intensity Score ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Umbilical Incision ◽  
Telephone Interviews ◽  
Intensity Score ◽  
Glove Port

Background. Technical difficulties and pain from large wounds have prevented the widespread use of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of our newly developed needle grasper (Endo Relief)-assisted SILA (NASILA). Methods. For NASILA, about a 12-mm umbilical incision was made, and a glove port was introduced. A needle grasper was then introduced through a 2.5-mm wound on the suprapubic area. For SILA, a 2.5-cm transumbilical wound was made. The medical records of patients who underwent SILA or NASILA from June 2017 to September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Operative and short-term postoperative outcomes and results of telephone interviews for scars were compared. Results. A total of 49 patients in the SILA group (male: 40.8%) and 12 in the NASILA group (male: 50.0%) were included. Appendicitis status (not perforated:perforated without abscess:perforated with abscess) was significantly different between the 2 groups (SILA vs NASILA, 30:18:1 vs 4:6:2, P = .027). Additional trocars were inserted in 9 patients (18.4%) of the SILA group. The operative time was significantly shorter (43.3 ± 33.6 vs 54.1 ± 15.6 minutes, P = .012), and the highest numerical pain intensity score during the first 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower (2.4 ± 0.7 vs 3.0 ± 0.9, P = .038) in the NASILA group than in the SILA group. Hospital stay, postoperative complications, and complaint of scar were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Conclusions. NASILA was not inferior to SILA regarding cosmetic results. Operative convenience is higher in NASILA than in SILA, and the smaller surgical wound in NASILA minimizes postoperative pain.

scholarly journals Short-term Outcomes of Non-robotic Single-incision Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Surgical Technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 721-727
Author(s):  
Juan Liu ◽  
Jaden Kohn ◽  
Chunhua Wu ◽  
Zhenkun Guan ◽  
Xiaoming Guan
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy ◽  
Short Term
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document