Impact of Spleen Preserving Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy on Postoperative Infectious Complications: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Milito ◽  
Alberto Aiolfi ◽  
Emanuele Asti ◽  
Emanuele Rausa ◽  
Gianluca Bonitta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Spleen Preserving

scholarly journals Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in Italy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pancreatology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. S39
Author(s):  
Marielda D'Ambra ◽  
Claudio Ricci ◽  
Giovanni Taffurelli ◽  
Salvatore Buscemi ◽  
Carlo Alberto Pacilio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Matched Studies Comparing Open and Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy

Pancreas ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 993-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanos Pericleous ◽  
Nicos Middleton ◽  
Siobhan Chloe McKay ◽  
Kaye Amelia Bowers ◽  
Robert Rayner Hutchins
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy

A systematic review and meta-analysis of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with preservation or ligation of the splenic artery and vein

The Surgeon ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Partelli ◽  
Roberto Cirocchi ◽  
Justus Randolph ◽  
Amilcare Parisi ◽  
Andrea Coratti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Splenic Artery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Spleen Preserving

scholarly journals Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in Italy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 458-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Ricci ◽  
Riccardo Casadei ◽  
Enrico Lazzarini ◽  
Marielda D'Ambra ◽  
Salvatore Buscemi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy

scholarly journals Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingbo Feng ◽  
Chuang Jiang ◽  
Xuping Feng ◽  
Yan Du ◽  
Wenwei Liao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Node Dissection

BackgroundRobotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) are the two principal minimally invasive surgical approaches for patients with pancreatic body and tail adenocarcinoma. The use of RDP and LDP for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains controversial, and which one can provide a better R0 rate is not clear.MethodsA comprehensive search for studies that compared robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for PDAC published until July 31, 2021, was conducted. Data on perioperative outcomes and oncologic outcomes (R0-resection and lymph node dissection) were subjected to meta-analysis. PubMed, Cochrane Central Register, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched based on a defined search strategy to identify eligible studies before July 2021.ResultsSix retrospective studies comprising 572 patients (152 and 420 patients underwent RDP and LDP) were included. The present meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in operative time, tumor size, and lymph node dissection between RDP and LDP group. Nevertheless, compared with the LDP group, RDP results seem to demonstrate a possibility in higher R0 resection rate (p<0.0001).ConclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that RDP is a technically and oncologically safe and feasible approach for selected PDAC patients. Large randomized and controlled prospective studies are needed to confirm this data.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier [CRD42021269353].

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document