Minimally Invasive Surgery in Pediatric Surgical Oncology: Practice Evolution at a Contemporary Single-Center Institution and a Guideline Proposal for a Randomized Controlled Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1046-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelhafeez Abdelhafeez ◽  
Lucia Ortega-Laureano ◽  
Andrew J. Murphy ◽  
Andrew M. Davidoff ◽  
Israel Fernandez-Pineda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Surgical Oncology ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Oncology Practice

Treatment of Bronchiectasis in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery: 10-Year Experience in a Single Center

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenan Can Ceylan ◽  
Güntuğ Batıhan ◽  
Şeyda Örs Kaya ◽  
Ozan Usluer ◽  
Soner Gürsoy
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Single Center

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Surgery in Pediatric Surgical Oncology

Children ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Phelps ◽  
Harold Lovvorn, III
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Surgical Oncology ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Pediatric Solid Tumors ◽  
Oncologic Resection

The application of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to resect pediatric solid tumors offers the potential for reduced postoperative morbidity with smaller wounds, less pain, fewer surgical site infections, decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and less disruption to treatment regimens. However, significant controversy surrounds the question of whether a high-fidelity oncologic resection of childhood cancers can be achieved through MIS. This review outlines the diverse applications of MIS to treat pediatric malignancies, up to and including definitive resection. This work further summarizes the current evidence supporting the efficacy of MIS to accomplish a definitive, oncologic resection as well as appropriate patient selection criteria for the minimally invasive approach.

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Surgery-Based Multidisciplinary Clinical Management of Reninoma: A Single-Center Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 1600-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kan Liu ◽  
Baojun Wang ◽  
Xin Ma ◽  
Hongzhao Li ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Clinical Management ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Single Center Study ◽  
Center Study

Spontaneous intracranial haematoma

2019 ◽  
pp. 643-650
Author(s):  
Berk Orakcioglu ◽  
Andreas W. Unterberg
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Intracranial Haematoma ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies

Spontaneous intracranial haematomas remain a challenging pathology with high morbidity and mortality (60–80% of long-term disability). Despite decades of the search for specific treatments no evidence has yet been found for neither conservative nor surgical treatment in randomized controlled studies. While patients with space occupying infratentorial haematomas are more likely to benefit from surgery treatment of supratentorial haemorrhages remains controversial. Recent studies suggest that minimally invasive surgery including endoscopy to evacuate intracranial haematoma may be more effective than conservative treatment or standard surgical craniotomy (MISTIE II). Future studies (i.e. MISTIE III, MISTICH, SWITCH) will hopefully demonstrate evidence for individualized treatments.

Thirty Years of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children: Analysis of Meta-Analyses

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (05) ◽  
pp. 420-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim F. Kuebler ◽  
Jens Dingemann ◽  
Benno M. Ure ◽  
Nagoud Schukfeh
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Pediatric Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Lower Complication ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Introduction In the last three decades, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been widely used in pediatric surgery. Meta-analyses (MAs) showed that studies comparing minimally invasive with the corresponding open operations are available only for selected procedures. We evaluated all available MAs comparing MIS with the corresponding open procedure in pediatric surgery. Materials and Methods A literature search was performed on all MAs listed on PubMed. All analyses published in English, comparing pediatric minimally invasive with the corresponding open procedures, were included. End points were advantages and disadvantages of MIS. Results of 43 manuscripts were included. MAs evaluating the minimally invasive with the corresponding open procedures were available for 11 visceral, 4 urologic, and 3 thoracoscopic types of procedures. Studies included 34 randomized controlled trials. In 77% of MAs, at least one advantage of MIS was identified. The most common advantages of MIS were a shorter hospital stay in 20, a shorter time to feeding in 11, and a lower complication rate in 7 MAs. In 53% of MAs, at least one disadvantage of MIS was found. The most common disadvantages were longer operation duration in 16, a higher recurrence rate of diaphragmatic hernia in 4, and gastroesophageal reflux in 2 MAs. A lower native liver survival rate after laparoscopic Kasai-portoenterostomy was reported in one MA. Conclusion In the available MAs, the advantages of MIS seem to outnumber the disadvantages. However, for some types of procedures, MIS may have considerable disadvantages. More randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the advantage of MIS for most procedures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document