Analysis of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy at a Single Veterans Affairs Medical Center

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 784-789
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Skancke ◽  
Robert A. Grossman ◽  
Gustavo Marino ◽  
Fredrick J. Brody ◽  
Gregory D. Trachiotis
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy

scholarly journals Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center initial experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olugbenga T. Okusanya ◽  
Inderpal S. Sarkaria ◽  
Nicholas R. Hess ◽  
Katie S. Nason ◽  
Manuel Villa Sanchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
University Of Pittsburgh ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
The University ◽  
Pittsburgh Medical

Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center initial experience

ASVIDE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 342-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
lugbenga T. Okusanya ◽  
Inderpal S. Sarkaria ◽  
Nicholas R. Hess ◽  
Katie S. Nason ◽  
Manuel Villa Sanchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
University Of Pittsburgh ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
The University ◽  
Pittsburgh Medical

Overcoming challenges in implementing a minimally invasive esophagectomy program at a Veterans Administration medical center

2011 ◽  
Vol 202 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Rossidis ◽  
Nicole Kissane ◽  
Steve N. Hochwald ◽  
William Zingarelli ◽  
George Sarosi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Veterans Administration ◽  
Administration Medical ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy

scholarly journals Technical details of the abdominal part during full robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Berlth ◽  
Carolina Mann ◽  
Eren Uzun ◽  
Evangelos Tagkalos ◽  
Edin Hadzijusufovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Optimal Setting ◽  
Thoracic Part ◽  
Technical Details

Abstract The full robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is an upcoming approach in the treatment of esophageal and junctional cancer. Potential benefits are seen in angulated precise maneuvers in the abdominal part as well as in the thoracic part, but due to the novelty of this approach the optimal setting of the trocars, the instruments and the operating setting is still under debate. Hereafter, we present a technical description of the ‘Mainz technique’ of the abdominal part of RAMIE carried out as Ivor Lewis procedure. Postoperative complication rate and duration of the abdominal part of 100 consecutive patients from University Medical Center in Mainz are illustrated. In addition, the abdominal phase of the full RAMIE is discussed in general.

scholarly journals European consensus on essential steps of Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown Esophagectomy through Delphi methodology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yassin Eddahchouri ◽  
◽  
Frans van Workum ◽  
Frits J. H. van den Wildenberg ◽  
Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Round Table ◽  
Round Table Discussion ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Delphi Methodology ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
European Consensus ◽  
Mckeown Esophagectomy

Abstract Background Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a complex and technically demanding procedure with a long learning curve, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To master MIE, training in essential steps is crucial. Yet, no consensus on essential steps of MIE is available. The aim of this study was to achieve expert consensus on essential steps in Ivor Lewis and McKeown MIE through Delphi methodology. Methods Based on expert opinion and peer-reviewed literature, essential steps were defined for Ivor Lewis (IL) and McKeown (McK) MIE. In a round table discussion, experts finalized the lists of steps and an online Delphi questionnaire was sent to an international expert panel (7 European countries) of minimally invasive upper GI surgeons. Based on replies and comments, steps were adjusted and rephrased and sent in iterative fashion until consensus was achieved. Results Two Delphi rounds were conducted and response rates were 74% (23 out of 31 experts) for the first and 81% (27 out of 33 experts) for the second round. Consensus was achieved on 106 essential steps for both the IL and McK approach. Cronbach’s alpha in the first round was 0.78 (IL) and 0.78 (McK) and in the second round 0.92 (IL) and 0.88 (McK). Conclusions Consensus among European experts was achieved on essential surgical steps for both Ivor Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Sundaram ◽  
Juan C. Geronimo ◽  
Brittany L. Willer ◽  
Masato Hoshino ◽  
Zachary Torgersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Surgeon Experience
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document