Laparoscopic Resection of Massive Ovarian Mucinous Cystadenoma

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles M. Leys ◽  
Alessandra C. Gasior ◽  
Laurie L. Hornberger ◽  
Shawn D. St. Peter
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wu L ◽  
Li X ◽  
Li J ◽  
Lai Y

Background: PRMC is a very rare benign tumor of the abdominal cavity that usually occurs in women, and PRMC demonstrate no specific findings on CT. There are many reports on the differential diagnosis and discussion of PRMC imaging, but there are few reports on the treatment of dedifferentiated PRMC using laparoscopic resection and postoperative follow-up.


Author(s):  
Kasim A. Behranwala ◽  
Tushar Agarwal ◽  
Dima El-Sharkawi ◽  
David Shorvon ◽  
Avril Chang

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryota Koyama ◽  
Yoshiaki Maeda ◽  
Nozomi Minagawa ◽  
Toshiki Shinohara ◽  
Tomonori Hamada

Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma (PRMC) is a rare cystic lesion occurring mostly in women with a histological analogy to ovarian mucinous cystadenoma. The tumor is difficult to detect during early stages because it causes symptoms only when it grows large enough to be palpable or to displace the adjacent internal organs. The primary treatment is resection, but the optimal surgical approach remains poorly known. We report the case of a 41-year-old woman who complained of right-sided intermittent abdominal pain. Imaging studies revealed a right retroperitoneal smooth cystic lesion (50 mm) without invasive features. Laparoscopic resection was then performed. During surgery, a right retroperitoneal mass with no connection to neighboring tissues was found. The tumor, wrapped by retroperitoneal fat tissue, was resected and removed from the body without exposure. Furthermore, histopathological findings indicated PRMC. The patient was discharged without any complications and observed to have no recurrence 6 months postoperatively.


2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong-Chi Chiu ◽  
Po-Li Wei ◽  
Ming-Te Huang ◽  
Weu Wang ◽  
Tai-Chi Chen ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Matsumoto ◽  
S. Kitano ◽  
T. Yoshida ◽  
T. Bandoh ◽  
K. Kakisako ◽  
...  

Surgery Today ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Shing Chen ◽  
Wei-Jei Lee ◽  
Yun-Jau Chang ◽  
Mu-Zon Wu ◽  
Kuan-Ming Chiu

2011 ◽  
Vol 72 (8) ◽  
pp. 2134-2138
Author(s):  
Tatsuya MIYAZAKI ◽  
Norihiro HAGA ◽  
Toru ISHIGURO ◽  
Keiichirou ISHIBASHI ◽  
Shinji ITOYAMA ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Shiihara ◽  
Takeshi Ohki ◽  
Masakazu Yamamoto

We report a case of appendiceal mucinous cystadenoma that was successfully diagnosed preoperatively and treated by laparoscopic resection. We could find volcano sign on colonoscopy and cystic lesion without any nodules at the appendix on computed tomography (CT). Without any malignant factors in preoperative examinations, we performed laparoscopic appendectomy including the cecal wall. We could avoid performing excessive operation for cystadenoma with accurate preoperative diagnosis and intraoperative finding and pathological diagnosis during surgery. Appendiceal mucocele is a rare disease that is divided into 3 pathological types: hyperplasia, cystadenoma, and cystadenocarcinoma. The surgical approaches for it remain controversial and oversurgery is sometimes done for benign tumor, because preoperative diagnosis is difficult and rupturing an appendiceal tumor results in dissemination. Based on our study, volcano sign on colonoscopy and CT findings were important for the preoperative diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele. Furthermore, we think that laparoscopic resection will become a surgical option for the treatment of appendiceal mucocele.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura dos Reis Chalub ◽  
Amanda Oliva Spaziani ◽  
Raissa Silva Frota ◽  
Stephanie Tiosso Fontes Monteiro ◽  
João Carlos Bizinotto Leal de Lima ◽  
...  

Introdução: A mucocele do apêndice é um termo utilizado para descrever uma dilatação deste órgão, devido ao acúmulo de secreção mucoide, tornando o apêndice dilatado, de paredes finas e com uma massa cística no seu interior. Na maioria dos casos a mucocele é resultante de neoplasia que obstrui a luz apendicular. Relato de caso: Sexo feminino, 55 anos, branca. Procurou atendimento médico devido à dor abdominal de moderada intensidade há cinco anos. Refere que os sintomas iniciaram com dor em fossa ilíaca direita e região lombar há cinco anos, quando começou a tratar lombalgia. Nesse ano, buscou atendimento graças a piora da dor. O abdome estava globoso, flácido, doloroso a palpação superficial e profunda em fossa ilíaca direita com ruídos hidroaéreos presentes. Devido a sintomatologia foram solicitados um ultrassom de abdome total que evidenciou imagem cística tubuliforme em região anexial direita, de aspecto simples, de contornos regulares e conteúdo anecoico, medindo 13,3 cm x 5,2 cm x 4,3 cm, sem septos, calcificações ou fluxo ao Doppler e ressonância magnética da pelve que demonstrou formação cística alongada em região anexial, mergulhante na região anexial, apêndice cecal não individualizado. Foi realizada uma cirurgia exploradora que resultou em apendicectomia e o produto enviado para análise histopatológica que resultou em mucocele de apêndice, sem critérios histológicos de malignidade. As mucoceles de apêndice foram classificadas em 3 categorias: hiperplasia mucosa sem atipias, mucocele simples; cistadenoma mucinoso, com algum grau de atipia e cistadenocarcinomamucinoso, com invasão estromal ou implantes peritoniais. Conclusão: A sintomatologia é a dor abdominal, de intensidade e duração variáveis, podendo também ser observados a presença de massa palpável em fossa ilíaca direita e emagrecimento. Embora cerca de 25% dos casos sejam assintomáticos, alguns estudos demonstram a correlação entre sintomatologia exuberante e displasia. Aproximadamente 20% dos casos de mucocele de apêndice têm associação com o câncer colorretal, no entanto, outras neoplasias como os carcinomas de ovário, endométrio, mama, próstata, bexiga e rim também podem estar presentes.Descritores: Mucocele; Apêndice; Dor Abdominal.ReferênciasEnsuncho C, Osorio C, Marrugo Á, Herrera F. Obstrucción intestinal parcial producida por mucocele apendicular con fístula a íleon proximal. rev colomb cir. 2016;31(1):61-4.Bichara DSJ, Luz Neto VC, Matuck MJ, Bichara DG. Pseudomixoma retroperitoneal (mucocele apendicular). Relatos Casos Cir. 2015;(1):1-3Moré Cabrera JA, León Aulla SP, Pérez Zavala GA. Presentación inusual de mucocele apendicular. Acta Médica Centro. 2015;9(4):62-7.Morano WF, Gleeson EM, Sullivan SH, Padmanaban V, Mapow BL, Shewokis PA et al. Clinicopathological features and management of appendiceal mucoceles: A systematic review. Am Surg. 2018;84(2):273-81.Park KJ, Choi HJ, Kim SH. Laparoscopic approach to mucocele of appendiceal mucinous cystadenoma: Feasibility and short-term outcomes in 24 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(11):3179-83.Demetrashvili Z, Chkhaidze M, Khutsishvili K, Topchishvili G, Javakhishvili T, Pipia I et al. Mucocele of the appendix: case report and review of literature. Int Surg. 2012;97(3):266-69.Basak F, Hasbahceci M, Yucel M, Sisik A, Acar A, Kilic A, Su Dur MS. Does it matter if it is appendix mucocele instead of appendicitis? Case series and brief review of literature. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(6):1355-60.Rabie ME, Al Shraim M, Al Skaini MS, Alqahtani S, El Hakeem I, Al Qahtani AS et al. Mucus containing cystic lesions “mucocele” of the appendix: the unresolved issues. Int J Surg Oncol. 2015;2015:139461.Hao S, Lilly R, Bonatti HJR. Laparoscopic resection of an appendix mucocele in a breast cancer patient. Case Rep Surg. 2018;2018:1780342.Dixit A, Robertson JH, Mudan SS, Akle C. Appendiceal mucocoeles and pseudomyxoma peritonei. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(16):2381-84. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document