The Validity of Using Health Administrative Data To Identify the Involvement of Specialized Pediatric Palliative Care Teams in Children with Cancer in Ontario, Canada

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1210-1216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberley Widger ◽  
Christina Vadeboncoeur ◽  
Shayna Zelcer ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Alisha Kassam ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
In Gyu Song ◽  
Seung Yeon Kwon ◽  
Yoon Jung Chang ◽  
Min Sun Kim ◽  
Sung Hoon Jeong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although the importance of palliative care in pediatric patients has been emphasized, many health care providers have difficulty determining when patients should be referred to the palliative care team. The Paediatric Palliative Screening Scale (PaPaS) was developed as a tool for screening pediatric patients for palliative care needs. The study aimed to evaluate the PaPaS as a reliable tool for primary care clinicians unfamiliar with palliative care. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients referred to the pediatric palliative care teams in two tertiary hospitals in the Republic of Korea between July 2018 and October 2019. Results The primary clinical and pediatric palliative care teams assessed the PaPaS scores of 109 patients, and both teams reported a good agreement for the sum of the PaPaS score. Furthermore, the PaPaS scores correlated with those obtained using the Lansky performance scale. Although the mean PaPaS score was higher in the pediatric palliative care team, the scores were higher than the cut-off score for referral in both groups. Conclusion The PaPaS can be a useful tool for primary care clinicians to assess the palliative care needs of patients and their families.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 81-81
Author(s):  
Kevin Madden ◽  
Maira Charone ◽  
Seyedeh Dibaj ◽  
Sarah Mills ◽  
Janet L. Williams ◽  
...  

81 Background: Systematic symptom assessment is not a standard of care in children with cancer. Many well-known symptom assessment tools are lengthy or difficult to integrate into a daily pediatric palliative care practice. We created a series of brief and simple questions to be systematically given to children and their caregivers. The primary objective was to determine the percentage of eligible children and caregivers exposed to the questions that were able to complete the assessment. Secondary objectives included documenting the symptom burden at time of consultation, evaluating the level of agreement in symptom reporting between children and caregivers, as well as between children/caregivers and the referring medical team. Methods: A series of systematic questions were presented to all caregivers (if present) and children who were 7 years of age or older at time of initial consultation with pediatric palliative care. Results: 122 consecutive children and caregivers were given the survey. 107/108 (99%) of eligible caregivers and 83/97 (86%) of eligible children successfully completed the survey. Lack of appetite (child – 72/83, 87%; caregiver – 89/107, 83%) and pain (child – 71/83, 86%; caregiver – 86/107, 80%) were the most commonly reported symptoms. Caregivers reported irritability (p = 0.005) and nervousness (p < 0.0001) more frequently than children. Referring medical teams significantly under-diagnosed psychological and other less clinically evident symptoms such as anorexia, fatigue, and insomnia (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our series of questions is easy to complete by children and caregivers. Systematic symptom assessment of children with cancer needs to become a true standard of care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10053-10053
Author(s):  
Michael McNeil ◽  
Bella Ehrlich ◽  
Marisol Bustamante ◽  
Veronica Dussel ◽  
Paola Friedrich ◽  
...  

10053 Background: While great strides have transpired in pediatric cancer management in high-income countries (HICs), more than 80% of all children with cancer live in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs),where fewer than 20% will be cured. The World Health Organization (WHO) has stated that early integration of palliative care is an ethical responsibility in the management of children with life-limiting illness. While structural barriers impact the ability to deliver pediatric palliative care (PPC), underlying stigma also prevents early integration of PPC. Methods: The Assessing Doctor’s Attitudes on Palliative Treatment (ADAPT) survey was created for physicians of all specialties who care for children with cancer, initially used in Eurasia. Survey questions evaluated provider perceptions on timing of palliative care integration, scope of palliative treatment, physician responsibility, and ethical issues. This survey was adapted for use in Latin America, including translation to Spanish and reviewed by regional palliative care specialists for syntax, comprehension, and cultural relevance. The survey was then distributed to physicians treating children with cancer in the region. To assess provider’s perspectives on palliative care, we used fifteen statements from the WHO 2018 guidelines, describing general palliative care principles. Results are reported as percent of alignment with guidelines. Results: A total of 1,039 participants from 16 countries in Latin America completed the survey, with a median country response rate of 66% (range 26%-100%). Thirty-six specialties were represented with 34% general pediatricians and 23% pediatric hematologist/oncologists. The majority (59%) had received no PPC training and 37% had no access to PPC experts for consultation in their practice setting. On average, provider’s perspectives on PPC were aligned with the WHO guidelines (81% alignment, range 53%-96%). However, almost half (42%) felt that the integration of pediatric palliative occurred too late in the course of treatment. Additionally, less than half (47%) of respondents felt comfortable addressing the physical symptoms of their patients, 33% felt comfortable addressing emotional symptoms, and only 26% felt comfortable addressing grief and bereavement for the patient’s family. The most common barriers identified were a lack of home-based services (87%), a lack of physician knowledge on the role of PPC (84%), and physician discomfort in discussing palliative care with families (81%). Nearly all (95%) wanted more training in PPC. Conclusions: Most physicians who completed the survey were not confident in providing symptomatic and supportive care for their patients and families. This study will guide targeted interventions for education in PPC for physicians in Latin America as well as interventions to address barriers which impede earlier palliative care integration in the region.


Author(s):  
Ji Yoon Kim ◽  
Bu Kyung Park

A good death is an important concept in pediatric palliative care. To improve the quality of pediatric palliative care, it is imperative to identify which domain is most important for a good death among children with cancer and their parents. This study aimed to (1) assess the essential domains for a good death from the perspectives of parents whose children have cancer using the Good Death Inventory (GDI) and (2) examine which characteristics are associated with the perception of a good death. An anonymous cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to 109 parents of children with cancer. Data were collected using a validated Korean version of the GDI. Descriptive statistics, t-test, and ANOVA were used to identify the preferred GDI domains. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the GDI scores. The most essential domains for a good death included “maintaining hope and pleasure” and “being respected as an individual.” The factors most strongly associated with the perception of a good death were end-of-life plan discussion with parents or others and parental agreement with establishing a living will. Encouraging families to discuss end-of-life care and establish a living will in advance can improve the quality of death among children with cancer.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 1034-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pia Schmidt ◽  
Michael Otto ◽  
Tanja Hechler ◽  
Sabine Metzing ◽  
Joanne Wolfe ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. McNeil ◽  
Bella Ehrlich ◽  
Huiqi Wang ◽  
Yuvanesh Vedaraju ◽  
Marisol Bustamante ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maryam Rassouli MD ◽  
Naiire Salmani MD ◽  
Zahra Mandegari MSc ◽  
Atena Dadgari MSc ◽  
Bahare Fallah Tafti MSc ◽  
...  

Pediatric palliative care is a holistic caring approach for children and families that begins with diagnosis of a life-threatening illness and continues until death; it aimed to relieve pain and other symptoms in physical, mental, social and spiritual aspects. In spite of available evidence concerning optimal outcomes of the provision of palliative care, establishment of a palliative care system for children has hardly been feasible so far due to a number of challenges. Therefore, this review study aimed at identifying the challenges of the provision of pediatric palliative care along with the relevant solutions. The identified challenges were classified into two categories including structure-based challenges (i.e. lack of a clear structure in the health system and classification of services, shortage of specialized staff, insufficient home care services, absence of health care tariffs along with insurance coverage of palliative care services) and process-based challenges (i.e. absence of guidelines, lack of educational programs for family, family attitudes and beliefs, communication barriers, and lack of access to opioids). Thereafter, the solutions for each challenge are provided in accordance with the available literature separately. Given the significance of palliative care for children with cancer and in order to improve the quality of life of the children and the families, it appears necessary that policymakers and managers take account of the challenges as well as the feasibility and the implementation of provided solutions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 26-26
Author(s):  
Laila Mahmood ◽  
Ann Dozier ◽  
James Dolan ◽  
Denise Casey ◽  
David Nathan Korones

26 Background: Although the overall survival of children with cancer exceeds 80%, these children experience significant physical, emotional, social and spiritual suffering. That suffering is even more profound for the 20% of children who succumb to their disease. We therefore conducted a prospective study to assess the feasibility and impact of early palliative care involvement for children with high risk malignancies. Objective: To determine if early palliative care involvement for high risk pediatric oncology patients is feasible, acceptable to patients, families and oncology teams, and helps with symptom management and communication. Methods: This was a prospective survey-based study. Children with cancer treated at University of Rochester were eligible to participate if they had a high risk malignancy, defined as (1) having a newly-diagnosed malignancy with an estimated overall survival of < 50%, (2) requiring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and/or (3) any relapsed, recurrent or progressive cancer. Parents of these children or children >18YO were surveyed upon study entry, and 3 and 6 months later to assess the impact of early and ongoing pediatric palliative care involvement. Results: 20/25 eligible patients received a palliative care consultation at diagnosis; 16 families participated in the study. Six children had a newly diagnosed high risk malignancy, nine had recurrent disease and one child had a HSCT. Median age of the children was 5 years (0.1-20 year).The most frequent symptoms at the time of study entry were pain (75%), nausea/vomiting (69%), constipation (44%), and fatigue (44%). 75%, 73%, 43% and 43% reported successful treatment of pain, nausea/vomiting, constipation, and fatigue respectively. The proportion of children with each symptom decreased at 3 months except for fatigue. There was high satisfaction with the oncology and pediatric palliative care teams at baseline and 3 and 6 months. No families or oncologists declined an early palliative care consultation. Conclusions: Our results suggest that an early palliative care consultation is feasible for high risk children with cancer and that the palliative care team can work successfully with the primary oncology team to foster symptom control and communication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document