Health System Advance Care Planning Culture Change for High-Risk Patients: The Promise and Challenges of Engaging Providers, Patients, and Families in Systematic Advance Care Planning

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Reidy ◽  
Jennifer Halvorson ◽  
Suzana Makowski ◽  
Delila Katz ◽  
Barbara Weinstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Health System ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Culture Change ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Planning Culture

Improving advance care planning in high‐risk hospitalised patients: a knowledge translation pilot study

2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-624
Author(s):  
Arvind Rajamani ◽  
Karen Fernandez ◽  
Hailey Carpen ◽  
Upul Liyanage ◽  
Jeffery Zijian Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Knowledge Translation ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Hospitalised Patients ◽  
Advance Care

scholarly journals Population-Based Pragmatic Trial of Advance Care Planning in Primary Care in the University of California Health System

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S-72-S-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne M. Walling ◽  
Rebecca L. Sudore ◽  
Doug Bell ◽  
Chi-Hong Tseng ◽  
Christine Ritchie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Pragmatic Trial ◽  
Population Based ◽  
University Of California ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
The University

Synchronizing advance directives among patients across a health system.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 233-233
Author(s):  
Sherri Rauenzahn Cervantez ◽  
Sadiyah Hotakey ◽  
Amanda Hernandez ◽  
Stephanie Warren ◽  
Jennifer Quintero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Health System ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Primary Care Clinic ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Palliative Oncology ◽  
Advance Care

233 Background: Advance directives (ADs) are legal tools that direct treatment or decision making and appoint a surrogate decision-maker (health care proxy). The presence of ADs is associated with decreased rates of hospitalization, use of life-sustaining treatment, and deaths in a hospital setting. Additionally, completed ADs lead to increased use of hospice or palliative care, more positive family outcomes, improved quality of life for patients, and reduced costs for healthcare. Despite the benefits of advance care planning, only 18-36% of adults have completed advance care plans. The aims of our pilot study were to 1) implement a synchronized system for advance care planning across the UT Health San Antonio health system and 2) improve advance care planning rates in a primary care clinic and palliative oncology clinic. Methods: During a 10-month prospective period, system processes for advance care planning were reviewed with identification of three primary drivers for advance care plan completion: a) electronic/EMR processes, b) clinical workflows and training, and c) patient resources and education. As a result of this quality improvement initiative, standardized forms, resources, and processes for obtaining advance care plans were implemented in the selected clinics. Results: At baseline, the primary care clinic had 84/644 (13%) patients and the palliative oncology clinic had 25/336(7%) with completed advance care plans. With the implementation of a standardized process, 108 patients (23% increase in rate of completion) in the primary clinic and 56 patients (71% increase in rate of completion) in the palliative oncology setting completed advance care planning (ACP). Additionally, there was a 5-fold increase in billing of ACP CPT codes within the clinics during the first 6 months compared to the prior full year. Conclusions: While this quality improvement pilot initiative was limited to two clinics, the synchronized modifications suggest that the system changes could be expanded to other clinics in our UT health system to promote ACP discussions, completion of plans, and ultimately improved patient care.

Advance care planning and terminal intensive care unit admissions for cancer patients: We can do better.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23000-e23000
Author(s):  
Joseph Heng ◽  
Ramy Sedhom ◽  
Thomas J. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Code Status ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Advance Care

e23000 Background: Terminal oncology intensive care unit (ICU) admissions are associated with high healthcare costs and decreased quality of life. Chemotherapy can be given in non-curative settings to optimize symptom control, but use of it at the end of life does not improve longevity. In addition, goals of care are too often not addressed for patients at high risk of death. Methods: We carried out a retrospective review identifying patients of a large academic cancer center who were admitted to and expired in an ICU between January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018. Results: 120 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 58 years. Only 15.0% (n = 18) of all patients had advance directives. The majority of patients (94.1%, n = 113) were FULL CODE on admission. Median duration of admission was 10 days. Median time to death from ICU admission was 7.5 days. 65.0% (n = 78) of all patients were intubated, while 15.0% (n = 15) received CPR. 58.3% (n = 70) of the study population had solid malignancies; of note, 97.1% (n = 68) of these patients were metastatic at presentation and had a median ECOG performance status of 2. Patients with metastatic solid tumors typically have a more indolent course of progression compared to patients with hematologic malignancies. However, only 23.5% (n = 16) had discussed goals of care or code status with their outpatient oncologists, despite many seeing them within the last month prior to admission (83.8%, n = 57). Similarly, only 4.0% (n = 2) of patients with hematologic malignancies had advance care planning discussions with their oncologists prior to their terminal ICU admission. 27.5% (n = 33) of all patients had an inpatient palliative care consult. The inpatient pulmonary/critical care team had a high rate of inpatient code status transitions, with 85.6% (n = 97) of FULL CODE admissions transitioning to DNR/DNI. Conclusions: These findings reflect contemporary practice at a major academic cancer center. Despite most patients having regular contact with their outpatient oncologists, the intensity of health care utilization noted highlights a need to optimize recognition of patients at high risk of death and to engage patients in advance care planning discussions to avoid terminal ICU admissions.

Risk of 12-month mortality among hospital inpatients using the surprise question and SPICT criteria: a prospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison M Mudge ◽  
Carol Douglas ◽  
Xanthe Sansome ◽  
Michael Tresillian ◽  
Stephen Murray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Prognostic Performance ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Surprise Question ◽  
Hospital Inpatients

ObjectivesPeople with serious life-limiting disease benefit from advance care planning, but require active identification. This study applied the Gold Standards Framework Proactive Identification Guidance (GSF-PIG) to a general hospital population to describe high-risk patients and explore prognostic performance for 12-month mortality.MethodsProspective cohort study conducted in a metropolitan teaching hospital in Australia. Hospital inpatients on a single day aged 18 years and older were eligible, excluding maternity and neonatal, mental health and day treatment patients. Data sources included medical record and structured questions for medical and nursing staff. High-risk was predefined as positive response to the surprise question (SQ) plus two or more SPICT indicators of general deterioration. Descriptive variables included demographics, frailty and functional measures, treating team, advance care planning documentation and hospital utilisation. Primary outcome for prognostic performance was 12-month mortality.ResultsWe identified 540 eligible inpatients on the study day and 513 had complete data (mean age 60, 54% male, 30% living alone, 19% elective admissions). Of these, 191 (37%) were high-risk; they were older, frailer, more dependent and had been in hospital longer than low-risk participants. Within 12 months, 92 participants (18%) died (72/191(38%) high-risk versus 20/322(6%) low-risk, P<0.001), providing sensitivity 78%, specificity 72%, positive predictive value 38% and negative predictive value 94%. SQ alone provided higher sensitivity, adding advanced disease indicators improved specificity.ConclusionsThe GSF-PIG approach identified a large minority of hospital inpatients who might benefit from advance care planning. Future studies are needed to investigate the feasibility, cost and impact of screening in hospitals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document