Winged Metal Needles versus Plastic Winged and Nonwinged Cannulae for Subcutaneous Infusions in Palliative Care: A Quality Improvement Project To Enhance Patient Care and Medical Staff Safety in a Singaporean Hospital

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirlyn Hui-Shan Neo ◽  
Mansha Hari Khemlani ◽  
Lai Kiow Sim ◽  
Angeline Soek Tian Seah
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Medical Staff ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Enhance Patient Care

scholarly journals Integration of Early Palliative Care in Oncology Patients: Improving Nursing Knowledge and Confidence

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Hurteau
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Nursing Education ◽  
Program Development ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Early Implementation ◽  
Oncology Care ◽  
Nurses Knowledge

Palliative care integrated with standard oncology care in cancer patients has been shown to provide a number of beneficial clinical outcomes. Despite the evidence, the utilization of palliative care in the oncology population continues to be inadequate. The purpose of this program development, quality improvement project was to improve nurses’ knowledge regarding palliative care and the benefits of its early implementation in the oncology population, as well as to improve their confidence regarding palliative care consultations to providers. An educational intervention was designed and a pre and posttest were utilized to determine the effect of the intervention. This program development, quality improvement project demonstrated that the implementation of nursing education regarding palliative care within the oncology population increased nurses’ knowledge in palliative care, specific to the oncology population, as well as confidence in recommending appropriate palliative care consultations to providers.

scholarly journals 55 Quality Improvement Project to Assess How Informed Patients are About do not Attempt Cardiopulmonary (DNACPR) Decisions?

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i14-i17
Author(s):  
P Jayasuriya ◽  
Y Amanullah ◽  
A Kumar ◽  
C Hookey
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Medical Staff ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Next Of Kin ◽  
Geriatric Ward ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Information Leaflets ◽  
Journal Clubs ◽  
Weekly Journal

Abstract Introduction Despite growing evidence regarding DNACPR decisions, there is a paucity of information given to patients regarding resuscitation decisions. The main aim of this quality improvement project was to assess and improve patients’ and their relatives’ understanding about DNACPR decisions. Intervention We initially surveyed 30 inpatients or their next-of-kin (if the patient lacked capacity) in a geriatric ward who had DNACPR decisions in place. Although, 86% knew the implications of a DNACPR decision, only 50% knew that a DNACPR decision would not limit them from receiving other treatment. 66% reported that the information given by the healthcare professional is “too little”. 35 questionnaires were also given to doctors of all grades to assess their practice of DNACPR discussions and barriers for discussion. Majority (95%) of doctors knew what should be included in a DNACPR discussion. Medical staff not considering DNACPR discussions during assessment, medical staff not comfortable to make the DNACPR decision and the fear of distressing the patient are the three main issues that were highlighted as barriers. 17% of doctors reported that they would have attended a cardiac arrest at least on 2-5 occasions for a patient when resuscitation was futile. We presented this data and educated doctors on effective DNACPR discussions using video demonstrations in weekly journal clubs. All doctors were informed to distribute DNACPR Improvement After the intervention, only 80% understood the DNACPR discussion. 76% knew that DNACPR does not limit them from receiving other treatment. 73% reported that this was not stressful and 76% were satisfied with the discussion and reported that their questions were answered adequately. 11 out of 30 patients had received the information leaflets and all found it useful. Discussion Although after the intervention the percentage who understood the DNACPR decision had reduced compared to the initial audit, there was a 20% improvement in who knew that DNACPR decisions did not limit other treatment. We hope to extend this study by carrying out training sessions for doctors to improve the quality of these conversations and thereby enhance adherence to expected practice in DNACPR decision making.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document