Evaluation of Genetic Status of HER-2/neu and Aneusomy 17 by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Comparison with Immunohistochemistry Assay from Indian Breast Cancer Patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prajakta Kokate ◽  
Satyakam Sawaimoon ◽  
Simi Bhatia ◽  
Swarna Mandava
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Genetic Status ◽  
Her 2

Comparison of HER2 Status by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry to Predict Benefit From Dose Escalation of Adjuvant Doxorubicin-Based Therapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (19) ◽  
pp. 4287-4297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn G. Dressler ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
Gloria Broadwater ◽  
David Cowan ◽  
Kelly Cox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Purpose HER2 is a clinically important tumor marker in breast cancer; however, there is controversy regarding which method reliably measures HER2 status. We compared three HER2 laboratory methods: immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), to predict disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. Methods This is a Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study, using 524 tumor blocks collected from breast cancer patients registered to clinical trial CALGB 8541. IHC employed CB11 and AO-11-854 monoclonal antibodies; FISH used PathVysion HER2 DNA Probe kit; PCR utilized differential PCR (D-PCR) methodology. Results Cases HER2 positive by IHC, FISH and D-PCR were 24%, 17%, and 18%, respectively. FISH and IHC were clearly related (κ = 64.8%). All three methods demonstrated a similar relationship for DFS and OS. By any method, for patients with HER2-negative tumors, there was little or no effect of dose of adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy. For patients with HER2-positive tumors, all three methods predicted a benefit from dose-intense (high-dose) compared with low- or moderate-dose adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy. Conclusion FISH is a reliable method to predict clinical outcome following adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy for stage II breast cancer patients. There is a moderate level of concordance among the three methods (IHC, FISH, PCR). None of the methods is clearly superior. Although IHC-positive/FISH-positive tumors yielded the greatest interaction with dose of therapy in predicting outcome, no combination of assays tested was statistically superior.

Chromosomal instability detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization in Japanese breast cancer patients

2001 ◽  
Vol 308 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Takami ◽  
Chie Kawasome ◽  
Moritoshi Kinoshita ◽  
Hiroki Koyama ◽  
Shinzaburo Noguchi
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Chromosomal Instability ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document