The Impact of Surgeon Volume on Perioperative Outcomes and Cost for Patients Receiving Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 851-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yash S. Khandwala ◽  
In Gab Jeong ◽  
Jae Heon Kim ◽  
Deok Hyun Han ◽  
Shufeng Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Surgeon Volume ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
The Impact

The Impact of Perioperative Aspirin on Bleeding Complications Following Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 997-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vignesh T. Packiam ◽  
Charles U. Nottingham ◽  
Andrew J. Cohen ◽  
Shane M. Pearce ◽  
Arieh L. Shalhav ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Tumor volume and tumor crossing of the axial renal midline predict renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruyuki Ohsugi ◽  
Kyojiro Akiyama ◽  
Hisanori Taniguchi ◽  
Masaaki Yanishi ◽  
Motohiko Sugi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity

AbstractThere are several nephrometry scoring systems for predicting surgical complexity and potential perioperative morbidity. The R.E.N.A.L. scoring system, one of the most well-known nephrometry scoring systems, emphasizes the features on which it is based (Radius, Exophytic/endophytic, Nearness to collecting system or sinus, Anterior/posterior, and Location relative to polar lines). The ability of these nephrometry scoring systems to predict loss of renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) remains controversial. Therefore, we verified which combination of factors from nephrometry scoring systems, including tumor volume, was the most significant predictor of postoperative renal function. Patients who underwent RPN for cT1 renal tumors in our hospital were reviewed retrospectively (n = 163). The preoperative clinical data (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], comorbidities, and nephrometry scoring systems including R.E.N.A.L.) and perioperative outcomes were evaluated. We also calculated the tumor volume using the equation applied to an ellipsoid by three-dimensional computed tomography. The primary outcome was reduced eGFR, which was defined as an eGFR reduction of ≥ 20% from baseline to 6 months after RPN. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between preoperative variables and reduced eGFR. Of 163 patients, 24 (14.7%) had reduced eGFR. Multivariable analyses indicated that tumor volume (cutoff value ≥ 14.11 cm3, indicating a sphere with a diameter ≥ approximately 3 cm) and tumor crossing of the axial renal midline were independent factors associated with a reduced eGFR (odds ratio [OR] 4.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69–12.30; P = 0.003 and OR 3.50; 95% CI 1.30–9.46; P = 0.034, respectively). Our classification system using these two factors showed a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) than previous nephrometry scoring systems (AUC = 0.786 vs. 0.653–0.719), and it may provide preoperative information for counseling patients about renal function after RPN.

scholarly journals Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of 1,002 Consecutive Patients With Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated by Robotic Partial Nephrectomy at a Single Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-192
Author(s):  
Taejin Kim ◽  
Jae Hoon Chung ◽  
Hyun Hwan Sung ◽  
Hwang Gyun Jeon ◽  
Byong Chang Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Death Rate ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Oncological Outcomes

Purpose: To analyze and compare the results of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) at a single center with the previous large-scale studies in terms of perioperative and oncological outcomes.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 1,013 cases of RPN in our center database from December 2008 to August 2018. Total 11 cases were excluded in final analysis. We evaluated perioperative outcomes as the Trifecta achievement, which is defined as no positive surgical margin (PSM), no perioperative complications greater than Clavien-Dindo classification I and a warm ischemia time of <25 minutes. In addition, we analyzed pathological and oncological outcomes; recurrence, metastasis, all-cause deaths, cancer-specific deaths, and 5-year survival rates.Results: In 1,002 cases, the Trifecta achievement was 61.1% (n=612). The postoperative complication was 18.4% (n=184) but most were grade 2 or less (14.9%, n=145). Ninety-three cases (9.28%) had benign and 907 cases (90.5%) had malignant pathologies. A local recurrence were 14 cases (1.54%) and distant metastasis were 20 cases (2.2%) during follow-up periods. Allcause death rate was 1.2% (n=11) and cancer-specific death rate was 0.2% (n=2). The median follow-up period was 39 months. A 5-year recurrence-free survival rate, cancer-specific survival rate, and overall survival rate were 95.2%, 99.7%, and 98.4%.Conclusions: In summary, our data shows comparable perioperative outcomes to other largescale studies of RPN in terms of the Trifecta achievement with similar baseline characteristics. In terms of oncological outcomes, there was lower rate of PSM and similar recurrence free survival rate.

The impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy

2012 ◽  
Vol 110 (11c) ◽  
pp. E997-E1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wahib E. Isac ◽  
Riccardo Autorino ◽  
Shahab P. Hillyer ◽  
Adrian V. Hernandez ◽  
Robert J. Stein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumours in obese patients: Perioperative outcomes in a multi-institutional analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Newaj Abdullah ◽  
Deepansh Dalela ◽  
Ravi Barod ◽  
Jeff Larson ◽  
Michael Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We sought to evaluate the association of obesity with surgical outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) using a large, multicentre database.<strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 1836 patients who underwent RPN from five academic centres from 2006-2014.  A total of 806 patients were obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between obese and non-obese patients. Multivariable analysis was used to assess the association of obesity on RPN outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 806 (44%) patients were obese with median BMI of 33.8kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Compared to non-obese patients, obese patients had greater median tumour size (2.9 vs. 2.5 cm, p&lt;0.001), mean RENAL nephrometry score (7.3 vs. 7.1, p = 0.04), median operating time (176 vs. 165 min, p=0.002), and median estimated blood loss (EBL, 150 vs. 100 ml, p=0.002), but no difference in complications. Obesity was not an independent predictor of operative time or EBL on regression analysis. Among obese patients, males had a greater EBL (150 vs. 100 ml, p&lt;0.001), operative time (180 vs. 166 min, p&lt;0.001) and warm ischemia time (WIT, 20 vs. 18, p=0.001) and male sex was an independent predictor of these outcomes on regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large, multicentre study on RPN, obesity was not associated with increased complications and was not an independent predictor of operating time or blood loss.  However, in obese patients, male gender was an independent predictor of greater EBL, operative time, and WIT.  Our results indicate that obesity alone should not preclude consideration for RPN.<strong></strong></p>

scholarly journals Early Single-Center Experience with Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Using the da Vinci Xi: Comparative Assessment with Conventional Open Partial Nephrectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Motoyama ◽  
Ryota Aki ◽  
Yuto Matsushita ◽  
Keita Tamura ◽  
Toshiki Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Da Vinci ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Da Vinci Xi ◽  
Ischemic Time ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate our experience with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in comparison with conventional open partial nephrectomy (OPN). Patients and Methods: This study included 37 and 50 patients undergoing OPN and RAPN for small renal masses, respectively. A single surgeon performed RAPN for all 50 cases using the da Vinci Xi. Trifecta was defined as satisfying all of the following 3 criteria: ischemic time of ≤ 25 minutes, negative surgical margin and no major postoperative complications. Results: After adjusting patient variables by 1:1 propensity-score matching, 37 patients were included in each group, and no significant differences in major clinicopathological characteristics were noted between these 2 groups. RAPN was significantly superior to OPN with respect to operative time, estimated blood loss and postoperative length of hospital stay. The rate of trifecta achievement was significantly higher in the RAPN group than in the OPN group (91.9 vs. 62.2%). Furthermore, the operative procedure and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score were found to be independently associated with trifecta outcome by multivariate analysis of the entire cohort. Conclusions: Although this is our early experience with 50 initial cases, RAPN using the da Vinci Xi resulted in more favorable perioperative outcomes than OPN.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document