Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with a History of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Feasibility and Evaluation of Initial Outcomes

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 764-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul T. Gellhaus ◽  
M. Francesca Monn ◽  
Joshua Leese ◽  
Chandra K. Flack ◽  
James E. Lingeman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Holmium Laser ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
History Of ◽  
Laser Enucleation ◽  
Holmium Laser Enucleation

scholarly journals Preoperative predictors of enucleation time during en bloc no-touch holmium laser enucleation of the prostate

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Hsuan Lin ◽  
Ching-Chia Li ◽  
Wen-Jeng Wu ◽  
Sheng-Chen Wen
Keyword(s):  
Operation Time ◽  
Holmium Laser ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Clinical Variables ◽  
Specimen Weight ◽  
History Of ◽  
Laser Enucleation ◽  
Holmium Laser Enucleation ◽  
Preoperative Predictors

Abstract Background To evaluate preoperative predictors of enucleation time during en bloc no-touch holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) Methods We enrolled 135 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with en bloc no-touch HoLEP from July 2017 to March 2019 by a single surgeon. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative clinical variables were examined. Stepwise linear regression was performed to determine clinical variables associated with enucleation times. Result The average (range) enucleation time was 46.1 (12–220) minutes, and the overall operation time was 71 (18–250) minutes. History of anticoagulation, history of urinary tract infection (UTI), and increasing specimen weight were each significantly associated with increasing enucleation time. No category IV complications were recorded, and all complications were evenly distributed among the groups according to the HoLEP specimen weight. Conclusion En bloc no-touch HoLEP was found to be an efficient and reproducible surgical method for treating BPH. Prostatic gland size was significantly associated with increased enucleation times. Similarly, history of UTI and anticoagulation were correlated with increased operative time.

scholarly journals Initial Experience with Radical Prostatectomy Following Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Kretschmer ◽  
Elio Mazzone ◽  
Francesco Barletta ◽  
Riccardo Leni ◽  
Isabel Heidegger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Holmium Laser ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
Laser Enucleation ◽  
Holmium Laser Enucleation

Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in patient with a history of Holium laser enucleation of the prostate

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 331
Author(s):  
C. Donkyoung ◽  
Y.S. Lee ◽  
O. Kwon ◽  
M. Seung Ki ◽  
Y.G. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
History Of ◽  
Laser Enucleation

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate and Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 847-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mimi W. Zhang ◽  
Marawan M. El Tayeb ◽  
Michael S. Borofsky ◽  
Casey A. Dauw ◽  
Kristofer R. Wagner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Holmium Laser ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Simple Prostatectomy ◽  
Laser Enucleation ◽  
Holmium Laser Enucleation

scholarly journals Preoperative predictors of enucleation time during en bloc ‘no-touch’ holmium laser enucleation of the prostate

BMC Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Hsuan Lin ◽  
Wen-Jeng Wu ◽  
Ching-Chia Li ◽  
Sheng-Chen Wen
Keyword(s):  
Operation Time ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Holmium Laser ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Clinical Variables ◽  
Specimen Weight ◽  
History Of ◽  
Laser Enucleation ◽  
Holmium Laser Enucleation ◽  
Preoperative Predictors

Abstract Background To evaluate preoperative predictors of enucleation time during en bloc ‘no-touch’ holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) Methods We enrolled 135 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with en bloc ‘no-touch’ HoLEP from July 2017 to March 2019 by a single surgeon. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative clinical variables were examined. Stepwise linear regression was performed to determine clinical variables associated with enucleation times. Result The average (range) enucleation time was 46.1 (12–220) minutes, and the overall operation time was 71 (18–250) minutes. History of antiplatelet agents, history of urinary tract infection (UTI), and increasing specimen weight were each significantly associated with increasing enucleation time. No category IV complications were recorded, and all complications were evenly distributed among the groups according to the HoLEP specimen weight. Conclusion En bloc ‘no-touch’ HoLEP was found to be an efficient and reproducible surgical method for treating BPH. Prostatic gland size was significantly associated with increased enucleation times. Similarly, history of UTI and antiplatelet agents were correlated with increased operative time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document