Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Radical Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion: Initial Experience in China Using a Homemade Single-Port Device

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu-Lin Ma ◽  
Hai Bi ◽  
Xiao-Fei Hou ◽  
Yi Huang ◽  
Guo-Liang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Urinary Diversion ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Single Site ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
Laparoendoscopic Single Site ◽  
Port Device

The Feasibility of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Nephrectomy: Initial Experience Using Home-made Single-port Device

Urology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 862-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woong Kyu Han ◽  
Yong Hyun Park ◽  
Hwang Gyun Jeon ◽  
Wooju Jeong ◽  
Koon Ho Rha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Port ◽  
Single Site ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
Laparoendoscopic Single Site ◽  
Port Device

Initial Experience With 50 Laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgeries Using a Homemade, Single Port Device at a Single Center

2010 ◽  
Vol 183 (5) ◽  
pp. 1866-1872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hwang Gyun Jeon ◽  
Wooju Jeong ◽  
Cheol Kyu Oh ◽  
Enrique Ian S. Lorenzo ◽  
Won Sik Ham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Port ◽  
Single Site ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Laparoendoscopic Single Site ◽  
Port Device

Our Experience with Retroperitoneal Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Ureterolithotomy

2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-63
Author(s):  
Zhonghua Wu ◽  
Youming Xu ◽  
Jianhua Yu ◽  
Jin Liu ◽  
Jiushun Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Port ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Single Site ◽  
Ureteral Stones ◽  
Laparoendoscopic Single Site ◽  
Laparoscopic Instruments ◽  
Costal Arch ◽  
Attractive Option ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Port Device

Aim: To report our experience with retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) ureterolithotomy for the management of large proximal ureteral stones. Patients and Methods: From July 2011 to April 2012, 20 patients underwent retroperitoneal LESS ureterolithotomy. The indications for the operation were impacted upper ureteral stones larger than 15 mm. A reusable elastic single-port device with 3 working channels was inserted through the 2.5-cm incision at the midpoint between the costal arch and iliac crest on the mid-axillary line. A rigid 10-mm 30° extra-long laparoscope was introduced for monitoring, and a combination of lengthened pre-bent and conventional laparoscopic instruments was used for handling. The surgical procedure was similar to conventional retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Results: Retroperitoneal LESS ureterolithotomy was completed in all of the patients. The mean stone size was 18.8 mm (range 16-28). The mean operative time was 108 min (range 75-140). Significant bleeding was not observed, and no major intraoperative complications occurred in any of the patients. The mean hospital stay was 4.4 days (range 3-7). Conclusions: Retroperitoneal LESS ureterolithotomy, using a reusable elastic single-port device, is technically feasible and safe, and the combination of conventional and pre-bent laparoscopic instruments represents an attractive option for retroperitoneal LESS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document