Evaluating Costs, Benefits, and Return on Investment for Disease Management Programs

1998 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 185-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
RICK F. DOXTATOR ◽  
DONNA J. RODRIGUEZ
Keyword(s):  
Disease Management ◽  
Return On Investment ◽  
Disease Management Programs

Quality of Life Is Improved in Uninsured Heart Failure Patients in Disease Management Programs in Public Hospitals

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. S6
Author(s):  
Aurelia O'Connell ◽  
Tracy Finegan ◽  
Jennifer Galindo ◽  
Gisele Munoz ◽  
Andrene Schonberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Disease Management ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Disease Management Programs ◽  
Heart Failure Patients

scholarly journals Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care—an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Wangler ◽  
Michael Jansky
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Disease Management ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Chronically Ill ◽  
Disease Management Programs ◽  
Federal States ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Chronically Ill Patients

Summary Background Disease management programs (DMPs) were set up in Germany in 2003 to improve outpatient care of chronically ill patients. The present study looks at the attitudes and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) in relation to DMPs, how they rate them almost 20 years after their introduction and where they see a need for improvement. Methods A total of 1504 GPs in the Federal States of Rhineland Palatinate, Saarland and Hesse were surveyed between December 2019 and March 2020 using a written questionnaire. Results In total, 58% of respondents rate DMPs positively and regard them as making a useful contribution to primary care. The guarantee of regular, structured patient care and greater compliance are regarded as particularly positive aspects. It was also established that diagnostic and therapeutic knowledge was expanded through participation in DMPs. 57% essentially follow the DMP recommendations for (drug) treatment. Despite positive experiences of DMPs in patient care, the GPs surveyed mention various challenges (documentation requirements, frequent changes to the programmes, inflexibility). Univariant linear regression analysis revealed factors influencing the satisfaction with DMPs, such as improvement of compliance and clearly defined procedures in medical care. Conclusion Most of the GPs surveyed consider the combination of continuous patient care and evidence-based diagnosis and treatment to be a great advantage. To better adapt DMPs to the conditions of primary care, it makes sense to simplify the documentation requirements, to regulate cooperation with other healthcare levels more clearly and to give GPs more decision-making flexibility. Increased inclusion of GP experience in the process of developing and refining DMPs can be helpful.

Who benefits most in disease management programs: Improving target efficiency

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Simcoe ◽  
Maryaline Catillon ◽  
Paul Gertler
Keyword(s):  
Disease Management ◽  
Disease Management Programs

scholarly journals Participation in Disease Management Programs and Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Fischer ◽  
Jens Höpner ◽  
Saskia Hartwig ◽  
Michel Noutsias ◽  
Rafael Mikolajczyk
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Disease Management ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiac Events ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Disease Management Programs ◽  
Cardiovascular Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Adverse Cardiac Events

Abstract Background Cardiovascular diseases are still the main cause of death in the western world. However, diminishing mortality rates of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are motivating the need to investigate the process of stationary and ambulatory secondary prevention after AMI. Besides cardiac rehabilitation, disease management programs (DMPs) are an important component of outpatient care after AMI in Germany. This study aims to analyze outcomes after AMI among those who participated in DMPs and stationary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in a region with overall increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Methods: On the basis of data from a regional myocardial infarction registry and a 2-years follow up period, we assessed the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in relation to participation in CR and DMP, risk factors for complications and individual health, and lifestyle characteristics. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to compare survival time until an adverse event occurred.Results Out of 1,094 observed patients AMI, 272 were enrolled in a DMP. A weak association between DMP participation and hazard rates for MACE compared to non-enrollees was found in the crude model (hazard ratio = 0.93; 95% confidence interval = 0.65–1.33). When adjusted for possible confounders, this difference disappeared (1.03; 0.72–1.48). Furthermore, smokers and obese patients showed a distinctly lower chance of DMP enrollment. In contrast, participants of CR showed a lower risk for MACE in crude (0.52; 0.41–0.65) and adjusted analysis (0.56; 0.44–0.71).Conclusions Participation in DMP was not associated with a lower risk of MACE, while CR showed beneficial effects. Adjustment only slightly changed effect estimates in both cases, still potential effects of confounding need to be considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document