scholarly journals Molecular Epidemiology of Early and Acute HIV Type 1 Infections in the United States Navy and Marine Corps, 2005–2010

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1310-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Heipertz ◽  
Eric Sanders-Buell ◽  
Gustavo Kijak ◽  
Shana Howell ◽  
Michelle Lazzaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Molecular Epidemiology ◽  
United States Navy ◽  
Marine Corps ◽  
The United States ◽  
Acute Hiv ◽  
Hiv Type 1

scholarly journals Analysis of HIV Type 1 gp41 and Enfuvirtide Susceptibility among Men in the United States Who Were HIV Infected Prior to Availability of HIV Entry Inhibitors

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 701-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Hudelson ◽  
Natalia Marlowe ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
Robert Bruce ◽  
Jessica D. Church ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Entry Inhibitors ◽  
Hiv Entry ◽  
Hiv Type 1 ◽  
Hiv Entry Inhibitors

The Officer Fitness Report as a Performance Appraisal Tool

1990 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don Cozzetto
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Performance Appraisal ◽  
United States Navy ◽  
Marine Corps ◽  
The United States ◽  
United States Marine Corps ◽  
Civil Service Reform ◽  
Appraisal Systems ◽  
Department Of The Army

Performance evaluation is an important tool for effective management. Much of the recent literature has focused on the efficacy of civilian performance appraisal systems. As a result, there is a knowledge gap with respect to military appraisal systems in general, and those of the United States Navy and the United States Marine Corps in particular. The 1978 Civil Service Reform Act spawned several performance appraisal systems within each of these agencies; the USMC utilizes five separate systems in the evaluation of civilian and military personnel; the Navy has adopted three separate appraisal mechanisms. This article specifically examines the device used to evaluate senior military staff in the Navy and Marine Corps—the fitness report. Because this particular appraisal methodology differs radically from its federal civilian counterparts, a rather detailed descriptive section serves as an orientation for the reader. The approach is intended to supplement John Pelissero's article on performance evaluation in the Department of the Army (Pelissero, 1984).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document