Field Metabolic Rates of Breeding Chinstrap Penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) in the South Shetlands

1996 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 586-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Moreno ◽  
Juan J. Sanz
Ecology ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 1181-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Furness ◽  
David M. Bryant

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (5) ◽  
pp. 431-437
Author(s):  
Michael Kam ◽  
Shaher El-Meccawi ◽  
Arieh Brosh ◽  
A. Allan Degen

AbstractSheep are grazers and goats are intermediate feeders. By employing O2 consumption and heart rate measurements, resting metabolic rate (RMR) and field metabolic rate (FMR) were determined in four male fat-tailed Awassi sheep (44.0 ± 3.94) and four male Baladi goats (35.5 ± 5.42 kg) that were co-grazing natural pasture in the Negev Desert. There were 67.7 ± 3.75 g DM/m2 of herbaceous vegetation biomass, which was rapidly becoming senescent and more fibrous. We hypothesized that FMR of these desert-adapted ruminants would be relatively low when compared to other sheep and goat breeds, as animals in arid areas tend to have low metabolic rates. Both sheep (n = 6) and goats (n = 6) foraged 71% of the allotted 11 h free-pasture period; however, sheep grazed more than goats (P < 0.001); whereas goats browsed more than sheep (P < 0.001). RMR was higher (P = 0.007) in sheep than in goats (529 ± 23.5 v. 474 ± 25.4 kJ/kg0.75 BW/d), but FMR did not differ between species (618 ± 55.7 v. 613 ± 115.2 kJ/kg0.75 BW/d). In addition, the cost of activities, as a proportion of FMR, did not differ between sheep and goats; FMR increased by 89 kJ/kg0.75 BW/d or 17% in sheep and by 138 kJ/kg0.75 BW/d or 29% in goats. In comparing FMRs of sheep and goats in this study with these species in other studies, differences were inconsistent and, therefore, our hypothesis was not supported.


Extremophiles ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel M. S. Alves ◽  
Vívian N. Gonçalves ◽  
Fabio S. Oliveira ◽  
Carlos E. G. R. Schaefer ◽  
Carlos A. Rosa ◽  
...  

Oecologia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 193 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karissa O. Lear ◽  
David L. Morgan ◽  
Jeff M. Whitty ◽  
Nicholas M. Whitney ◽  
Evan E. Byrnes ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 217 (9) ◽  
pp. 1485-1495 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Maresh ◽  
S. E. Simmons ◽  
D. E. Crocker ◽  
B. I. McDonald ◽  
T. M. Williams ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. E. Sparling ◽  
D. Thompson ◽  
M. A. Fedak ◽  
S. L. Gallon ◽  
J. R. Speakman

Polar Record ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 644-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rip Bulkeley

ABSTRACTThe celebrated meeting between Captain Bellingshausen of the Imperial Russian Navy and the American sealing skipper Nathaniel Brown Palmer, off the South Shetland Islands in February 1821, has often been described by following just one or other of the two men's divergent and in some respects irreconcilable accounts. The most contentious issue is whether or not Palmer told Bellingshausen about the existence of a body of land to the south of the South Shetlands, known today as the Antarctic Peninsula. This note attempts to reach a balanced assessment of the matter by examining evidence from both sides, including several previously unconsidered items. It concludes that, although the truth will never be known with absolute certainty, the basic American account is more plausible, by the narrowest of narrow margins, than the Russian.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document