EFFECTIVE MARGINAL TAX RATES UNDER THE FEDERAL INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX: DEATH BY ONE THOUSAND PIN PRICKS?

1998 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 553-564
Author(s):  
THOMAS A. BARTHOLD ◽  
THOMAS KOERNER ◽  
JOHN F. NAVRATIL
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lintje Kalangi

The objective of this research  is to analyze   the effect of tax rates, and the probability of audit on individual income tax compliance.This research is an explanatory  research, which done through  laboratory experiment, to explain the casual   relationships (causality)  between variables. Participants of  this experiment  consit of 30  students Master of Accounting and Accounting Professional  Program at Faculty of Economics, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado. The model analysis was of the research  using Normal Censored Tobit ).The results indicate that: (1)  tax rate has  positive effect on tax compliance behavior. (2) probability of audit has   positive effect on compliance tax and changes in probability  of audit level has different effect   on compliance tax.


1979 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 368-379
Author(s):  
BENJAMIN A. OKNER

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Clingingsmith ◽  
Scott Shane

We review the empirical literature on the effects of individual income tax policy on entrepreneurship. We find no evidence of consensus, even on relatively narrow questions such as whether individual income tax rates deter or encourage entrepreneurial entry. We believe the absence of consensus reflects both the complexity of mechanisms connecting tax policy to entrepreneurial decision making and the infeasibility of employing the most reliable empirical methods, such as experiments, in this domain.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Repetti

Increased focus on economic efficiency in formulating tax policy, at the expense of achieving equity, has resulted in decreased rate progressivity in our individual income tax. This decrease has exacerbated inequality. There are several explanations for the intense focus on efficiency and reduced emphasis on equity. Predictions of efficiency gains from low individual income tax rates appear more certain than equity gains from progressive tax rates. Efficiency gains seem measurable, while equity gains appear intangible and unquantifiable. In addition, distributive justice, which underlies and shapes tax equity, exists in many abstract forms, some of which may not require progressive tax rates. This Article argues, however, that the emphasis on efficiency is misplaced. Inequality imposes measurable costs on the health, social well-being, and intergenerational mobility of our citizens, as well as on our democratic process. This is corroborated by significant empirical analysis. In contrast, empirical analysis shows that anticipated efficiency gains from low individual tax rates are speculative. A consensus exists among economists that taxes within the historical range of rates in the United States have little or no impact on labor supply. Moreover, economists cannot agree whether the myriad empirical studies on savings indicate that progressive tax rates decrease, increase, or have no impact on savings in the United States. The clear harms arising from inequality and the uncertain harms arising from progressive tax rates, strongly support always giving equity at least equal weight with efficiency in formulating tax policy. But given the high level of inequality in the United States and the currently low and flat tax rate structure, equity should be given more weight than efficiency at this time. Emphasizing equity in a progressive individual income tax will contribute to the health and economic mobility of our citizens, as well as the stability of our democracy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document