scholarly journals Explanatory coherence and the impossibility of confirmation by coherence

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
TED POSTON
2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-121
Author(s):  
Adam Nedeljkovic

The aim of this paper is an attempt at analyses and reconciliation of some prima facie confronted theories of reliability in the context of formal theories of coherence. Formal coherentists attempted to show that there is an epistemologically interesting connection between coherence of an information set and reliability of information sources. Amongst these authors there are divisions and differences concerning the nature of coherence, as well as the nature of reliability. On the one side, we have before us probabilistic coherentists who support a statistical understanding of reliability. On the other side we have supporters of explanatory coherence who see reliability as a dispostition. There are two goals that we shall attempt to achieve in this paper: to present and explain some ideas of reliability, without going into fine detailes and depths of theories in which they were formulated and to show that those ideas about reliability are not that irreconcilable as they might appear, but that they together can form something that we shall call ?reliability profile of an information source?, ?the most basic version?, or shorter: RPISbasic.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. e0209758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Shtulman ◽  
Max Rattner

Erkenntnis ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Thagard

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard Vreeswijk

1997 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Eliasmith ◽  
Paul Thagard

1989 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 479-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel S. Levine

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document