The Relative Impact of Aligning Tier 2 Intervention Materials with Classroom Core Reading Materials in Grades K–2

2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 477-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara R. Foorman ◽  
Sarah Herrera ◽  
Jennifer Dombek
2020 ◽  
pp. 001440292095376
Author(s):  
Hank Fien ◽  
Nancy J. Nelson ◽  
Keith Smolkowski ◽  
Derek Kosty ◽  
Marissa Pilger ◽  
...  

States are increasingly recommending that districts and schools use multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS) to improve reading outcomes for all students. States have also suggested MTSS is a viable service delivery model in response to new state legislation to screen, identify, and treat students with word-level reading disability (i.e., dyslexia). One model of MTSS that utilizes Enhanced Core Reading Instruction (ECRI MTSS), has demonstrated significant increases in students’ early acquisition of foundational reading skills (Smith et al., 2016). The purpose of this study was to conduct a conceptual replication of the Smith’s (2016) original impact study. In a cluster-randomized controlled trial, 44 schools were randomly assigned to the ECRI MTSS treatment or a business-as-usual (BAU) MTSS control condition. Across conditions, 754 students were assigned to receive Tier 2 intervention in addition to Tier 1 instruction. Impact data indicate moderate to strong effects on student decoding, word reading, and fluency skills for students in the ECRI MTSS schools. Results suggest that schools can use ECRI MTSS to improve foundational reading skills for struggling early readers, including students with or at risk for word-level reading disabilities (i.e., dyslexia).


Author(s):  
Michael S. Kelly ◽  
Johnny S. Kim ◽  
Cynthia Franklin

The educational policy changes of the past 20 years have increased the focus on the provision of prevention services within schools, both for individual students and for social-emotional programming delivered in their classroom. Whether characterized as Response to Intervention (RTI), Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports (PBIS), or Multi-Tiered Systems of Supports (MTSS), the focus on a 3-tier framework of universal (Tier 1), selective (Tier 2) and indicated (Tier 3) has become one of the largest evidence-based framework ever scaled up within American schools, with over 19,000 schools across all 50 states having implemented PBIS by this writing. This chapter focuses on an example of a SFBT Tier 2 intervention, the Working on What Works (WOWW) teacher coaching intervention, that strives to create a better classroom climate for teachers and their students.


Author(s):  
Evelyn S. Johnson

Response to intervention (RTI) is a framework that can help ensure the academic strengths and needs of students are met effectively and efficiently. Patterned on a public health model of prevention, the focus of RTI is on preventing and intervening for academic challenges through a system of increasingly intensive supports, where the least intensive but most effective option is the most desirable. RTI models consist of the key essential components of effective inclusive instruction, universal screening, progress monitoring, data-based instructional decision-making, tiered levels of evidence-based and culturally responsive interventions, and fidelity of implementation. When the RTI framework is well implemented, most students are successful in the general education environment. In the general education classroom, teachers provide quality core, or Tier 1, instruction for all students. Even with high-quality instruction, however, not all students will be successful. Between 10 and 15% of the student population will likely need more intensive academic support at some point during their schooling, typically referred to as Tier 2 intervention. Tier 2 provides a system of evidence-based intervention, designed to meet the needs of most students at risk for poor academic outcomes. Tier 2 interventions are meant to be short in duration, focused on improving skill deficits that interfere with students’ success, and comprised of systematic approaches to providing student support. For some students whose needs cannot be met through Tier 1 or 2 instruction, an even more intensive level of intervention will be required. Tier 3 consists of specially designed interventions to support the needs of students who require a more individualized, intensive instructional program. Through this multi-leveled prevention system, the RTI framework provides supports to students that are appropriate to their needs within an environment of equity, efficiency, and accountability. With a well-structured, rigorous implementation of RTI, schooling becomes much more fluid and responsive to meet student needs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Pedrotty Bryant ◽  
Kathleen Hughes Pfannenstiel ◽  
Brian R. Bryant ◽  
Greg Roberts ◽  
Anna-Mari Fall ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of an early numeracy Tier 2 intervention on the mathematics performance of second-grade students with persistent mathematics difficulties. Whole number content and instructional design features were used to boost performance in second-grade early numeracy concepts and skills. Researchers employed a pretest-posttest control group design with randomized assignment of 83 students to the treatment condition and 38 students to the comparison condition. The research team’s mathematics interventionists delivered instruction four days per week for 20 weeks to small groups of second-grade students who were identified with persistent mathematics difficulties. Proximal and distal measures were used to determine the effects of the intervention. Findings showed that students in the treatment group outperformed students in the comparison group on the proximal measure of mathematics performance. There were no differences between groups on the problem-solving measures.


2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie R. Kerins ◽  
Dawn Trotter ◽  
Lisa Schoenbrodt

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-64
Author(s):  
Alyssa M. Van Camp ◽  
Joseph H. Wehby ◽  
Bailey A. Copeland ◽  
Allison L. Bruhn

School-Wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) relies on effective implementation of Tier 1 practices to ensure accurate identification of students in need of more intensive supports at Tier 2 or Tier 3. While measures of school-level fidelity are widely used, measures of classroom-level implementation of Tier 1 supports are less common. If classroom levels of Tier 1 supports are variable, schools may identify students for Tier 2 supports when, instead, teachers need support implementing Tier 1 in classrooms. The purpose of this case study was to assess the impact of a self-monitoring intervention, Monitoring Behavior on the Go (MoBeGo), on the academic engagement and disruptive behavior of a middle school student. Initially, the impact of the self-monitoring intervention was inadequate. In the context of evaluating the impact of a Tier 2 intervention, we identified an opportunity to assess whether a class-wide Tier 1 program, Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams (CW-FIT), enhanced the effectiveness of the Tier 2 intervention. Using an A-B-BC-B-BC design, we compared the effectiveness of a Tier 2 intervention alone with a combined Tier 1 + Tier 2 intervention. When the class-wide Tier 1 program was layered on top of the Tier 2 intervention, the student’s academic engagement showed an increase in level and stability.


Author(s):  
Amy Campbell ◽  
Billie Jo Rodriguez ◽  
Cynthia Anderson ◽  
Aaron Barnes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document