Surgical Site Infections, International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) Report, Data Summary of 30 Countries, 2005–2010

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 597-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor D. Rosenthal ◽  
Rosana Richtmann ◽  
Sanjeev Singh ◽  
Anucha Apisarnthanarak ◽  
Andrzej Kübler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Hip Prosthesis ◽  
Coronary Bypass ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Surveillance Study ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Control And Prevention

Objective.To report the results of a surveillance study on surgical site infections (SSIs) conducted by the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC).Design.Cohort prospective multinational multicenter surveillance study.Setting.Eighty-two hospitals of 66 cities in 30 countries (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Greece, India, Kosovo, Lebanon, Lithuania, Macedonia, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Salvador, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Sudan, Thailand, Turkey, Uruguay, and Vietnam) from 4 continents (America, Asia, Africa, and Europe).Patients.Patients undergoing surgical procedures (SPs) from January 2005 to December 2010.Methods.Data were gathered and recorded from patients hospitalized in INICC member hospitals by using the methods and definitions of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC-NHSN) for SSI. SPs were classified into 31 types according toInternational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, criteria.Results.We gathered data from 7,523 SSIs associated with 260,973 SPs. SSI rates were significantly higher for most SPs in INICC hospitals compared with CDC-NHSN data, including the rates of SSI after hip prosthesis (2.6% vs 1.3%; relative risk [RR], 2.06 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.8–2.4];P<.001), coronary bypass with chest and donor incision (4.5% vs 2.9%; RR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.4–1.6];P<.001); abdominal hysterectomy (2.7% vs 1.6%; RR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.4–2.0];P<.001); exploratory abdominal surgery (4.1 % vs 2.0%; RR, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.6–2.6];P<.001); ventricular shunt, 12.9% vs 5.6% (RR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.9–2.6];P<.001), and others.Conclusions.SSI rates were higher for most SPs in INICC hospitals compared with CDC-NHSN data.

scholarly journals Use of Medicare Diagnosis and Procedure Codes to Improve Detection of Surgical Site Infections following Hip Arthroplasty, Knee Arthroplasty, and Vascular Surgery

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Calderwood ◽  
Allen Ma ◽  
Yosef M. Khan ◽  
Margaret A. Olsen ◽  
Dale W. Bratzler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Medicare Claims ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Procedure Codes

Objective.To evaluate the use of routinely collected electronic health data in Medicare claims to identify surgical site infections (SSIs) following hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, and vascular surgery.Design.Retrospective cohort study.Setting.Four academic hospitals that perform prospective SSI surveillance.Methods.We developed lists of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology diagnosis and procedure codes to identify potential SSIs. We then screened for these codes in Medicare claims submitted by each hospital on patients older than 65 years of age who had undergone 1 of the study procedures during 2007. Each site reviewed medical records of patients identified by either claims codes or traditional infection control surveillance to confirm SSI using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/ National Healthcare Safety Network criteria. We assessed the performance of both methods against all chart-confirmed SSIs identified by either method.Results.Claims-based surveillance detected 1.8–4.7-fold more SSIs than traditional surveillance, including detection of all previously identified cases. For hip and vascular surgery, there was a 5-fold and 1.6-fold increase in detection of deep and organ/space infections, respectively, with no increased detection of deep and organ/space infections following knee surgery. Use of claims to trigger chart review led to confirmation of SSI in 1 out of 3 charts for hip arthroplasty, 1 out of 5 charts for knee arthroplasty, and 1 out of 2 charts for vascular surgery.Conclusion.Claims-based SSI surveillance markedly increased the number of SSIs detected following hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, and vascular surgery. It deserves consideration as a more effective approach to target chart reviews for identifying SSIs.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(1):40-49

scholarly journals Administrative Coding Methods Impact Surgical Site Infection Rates

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s111-s112
Author(s):  
Mohammed Alsuhaibani ◽  
Mohammed Alzunitan ◽  
Kyle Jenn ◽  
Daniel Diekema ◽  
Michael Edmond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Hip Prosthesis ◽  
Knee Prosthesis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Coding Method ◽  
The Impact

Background: Surveillance for surgical site infections (SSI) is recommended by the CDC. Currently, colon and abdominal hysterectomy SSI rates are publicly available and impact hospital reimbursement. However, the CDC NHSN allows surgical procedures to be abstracted based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) or current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. We assessed the impact of using ICD and/or CPT codes on the number of cases abstracted and SSI rates. Methods: We retrieved administrative codes (ICD and/or CPT) for procedures performed at the University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics over 1 year: October 2018–September 2019. We included 10 procedure types: colon, hysterectomy, cesarean section, breast, cardiac, craniotomy, spinal fusion, laminectomy, hip prosthesis, and knee prosthesis surgeries. We then calculated the number of procedures that would be abstracted if we used different permutations in administration codes: (1) ICD codes only, (2) CPT codes only, (3) both ICD and CPT codes, and (4) at least 1 code from either ICD or CPT. We then calculated the impact on SSI rates based on any of the 4 coding permutations. Results: In total, 9,583 surgical procedures and 180 SSIs were detected during the study period using the fourth method (ICD or CPT codes). Denominators varied according to procedure type and coding method used. The number of procedures abstracted for breast surgery had a >10-fold difference if reported based on ICD only versus ICD or CPT codes (104 vs 1,109). Hip prosthesis had the lowest variation (638 vs 767). For SSI rates, cesarean section showed almost a 3-fold increment (2.6% when using ICD only to 7.32% with both ICD & CPT), whereas abdominal hysterectomy showed nearly a 2-fold increase (1.14% when using CPT only to 2.22% with both ICD & CPT codes). However, SSI rates remained fairly similar for craniotomy (0.14% absolute difference), hip prosthesis (0.24% absolute difference), and colon (0.09% absolute difference) despite differences in the number of abstracted procedures and coding methods. Conclusions: Denominators and SSI rates vary depending on the coding method used. Variations in the number of procedures abstracted and their subsequent impact on SSI rates were not predictable. Variations in coding methods used by hospitals could impact interhospital comparisons and benchmarking, potentially leading to disparities in public reporting and hospital penalties.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Surgical Site Infections Rates in More Than 13,000 Surgical Procedures in Three Cities in Peru: Findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 572-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando M. Ramírez-Wong ◽  
Teodora Atencio-Espinoza ◽  
Victor D. Rosenthal ◽  
Eliza Ramirez ◽  
Socorro L. Torres-Zegarra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Surgical Site Infections

scholarly journals Central Line-Associated Infections as Defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Hospital-Acquired Condition versus Standard Infection Control Surveillance Why Hospital Compare Seems Conflicted

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebekah W. Moehring ◽  
Russell Staheli ◽  
Becky A. Miller ◽  
Luke Francis Chen ◽  
Daniel John Sexton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Case Finding ◽  
Condition Versus ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Central Line Infection ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Finding Method

Objective.To evaluate the concordance of case-finding methods for central line-associated infection as defined by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) hospital-acquired condition (HAC) compared with traditional infection control (IC) methods.Setting.One tertiary care and 2 community hospitals in North Carolina.Patients.Adult and pediatric hospitalized patients determined to have central line infection by either case-finding method.Methods.We performed a retrospective comparative analysis of infection detected using HAC versus standard IC central line–associated bloodstream infection surveillance from October 1, 2007, through December 31, 2009. One billing and 2 IC databases were queried and matched to determine the number and concordance of cases identified by each method. Manual review of 25 cases from each discordant category was performed. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated using IC as criterion standard.Results.A total of 1,505 cases were identified: 844 by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), and 798 by IC. A total of 204 cases (24%) identified by ICD-9 were deemed not present at hospital admission by coders. Only 112 cases (13%) were concordant. HAC sensitivity was 14% and PPV was 55% compared with IC. Concordance was low regardless of hospital type. Primary reasons for discordance included differences in surveillance and clinical definitions, clinical uncertainty, and poor documentation.Conclusions.The case-finding method used by CMS HAC and the methods used for traditional IC surveillance frequently do not agree. This can lead to conflicting results when these 2 measures are used as hospital quality metrics.

Review of Current Literature on the Economic Burden of Clostridium difficile Infection

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik R. Dubberke ◽  
Albert I. Wertheimer
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Economic Burden ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
The United States ◽  
Diagnosis Code ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Clostridium difficile is well recognized as the most common infectious cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea. Since 2000, this pathogen has demonstrated an increased propensity to cause more frequent and virulent illness that is often refractory to treatment. An analysis by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revealed that, in the United States, the number of patients discharged from hospitals who received the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision discharge diagnosis code for C. difficile infection (CDI) more than doubled from 2000 to 2003. Unpublished data indicate that this trend has continued and that more than 250,000 US hospitalizations were associated with CDI in 2005. A previously uncommon hypervirulent strain of C. difficile is thought to contribute, in part, to the dramatic increase in the incidence and severity of the infection. Although the economic impact of the disease is believed to be profound and is expected to increase, data on the costs associated with CDI are scarce. To more completely assess its economic burden, we performed a review of available literature that reported costs associated with the infection.

Effectiveness of a multidimensional approach for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in 21 adult intensive-care units from 10 cities in India: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC)

2013 ◽  
Vol 141 (12) ◽  
pp. 2483-2491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. MEHTA ◽  
N. JAGGI ◽  
V. D. ROSENTHAL ◽  
C. RODRIGUES ◽  
S. K. TODI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Multidimensional Approach ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Performance

SUMMARYWe report on the effect of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium's (INICC) multidimensional approach for the reduction of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in adult patients hospitalized in 21 intensive-care units (ICUs), from 14 hospitals in 10 Indian cities. A quasi-experimental study was conducted, which was divided into baseline and intervention periods. During baseline, prospective surveillance of VAP was performed applying the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network definitions and INICC methods. During intervention, our approach in each ICU included a bundle of interventions, education, outcome and process surveillance, and feedback of VAP rates and performance. Crude stratified rates were calculated, and by using random-effects Poisson regression to allow for clustering by ICU, the incidence rate ratio for each time period compared with the 3-month baseline was determined. The VAP rate was 17·43/1000 mechanical ventilator days during baseline, and 10·81 for intervention, showing a 38% VAP rate reduction (relative risk 0·62, 95% confidence interval 0·5–0·78, P = 0·0001).

scholarly journals Evaluation of Nosocomial Infection Control Programs in health services

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayra Gonçalves Menegueti ◽  
Silvia Rita Marin da Silva Canini ◽  
Fernando Bellissimo-Rodrigues ◽  
Ana Maria Laus
Keyword(s):  
Health Services ◽  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Epidemiological Surveillance ◽  
Control Programs ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Prevention Of Nosocomial Infection ◽  
And Control ◽  
Mean Compliance

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the Nosocomial Infection Control Programs in hospital institutions regarding structure and process indicators.METHOD: this is a descriptive, exploratory and quantitative study conducted in 2013. The study population comprised 13 Nosocomial Infection Control Programs of health services in a Brazilian city of the state of São Paulo. Public domain instruments available in the Manual of Evaluation Indicators of Nosocomial Infection Control Practices were used.RESULTS: The indicators with the highest average compliance were "Evaluation of the Structure of the Nosocomial Infection Control Programs" (75%) and "Evaluation of the Epidemiological Surveillance System of Nosocomial Infection" (82%) and those with the lowest mean compliance scores were "Evaluation of Operational Guidelines" (58.97%) and "Evaluation of Activities of Control and Prevention of Nosocomial Infection" (60.29%).CONCLUSION: The use of indicators identified that, despite having produced knowledge about prevention and control of nosocomial infections, there is still a large gap between the practice and the recommendations.

Nosocomial Infections in 15 Rural Wisconsin Hospitals—Results and Conclusions from 6 Months of Comprehensive Surveillance

1986 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 397-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Scheckler ◽  
Patty J. Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Total Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Care Community ◽  
Infection Incidence ◽  
Infection Control Practitioner ◽  
Hospital Infection Control ◽  
Discharged Patients

AbstractFifteen rural Wisconsin acute care community hospitals with an average approved bed size of 55 and an average daily census of 28 patients participated in a nosocomial infection control project. Each hospital Infection Control Practitioner (ICP) was trained and conducted prospective nosocomial infection surveillance on all patients admitted to the hospital for 6 consecutive months between May 1,1984 and April 30, 1985. Two hundred twenty nosocomial infections were reported among 13,420 discharged patients for an incidence rate of 1.64 infections per 100 discharged patients. One hundred sixty-four patients had one nosocomial infection. Twenty-three patients had two or more. Infection rates were highest among gynecology— 4.9% and general surgery patients— 4.0%, and lowest among newborns—0.3% and pediatric patients—0%. 39.7% of the infections were of the urinary tract, 27.9% of surgical wounds, 16% pneumonia, and 1.4% primary bacteremia. The other infections were in seven additional sites. Risk factors associated with acquisition of infections included old age, urinary catheterization, and/or a surgical procedure. The overall nosocomial surgical wound infection incidence for inpatient procedures was 1.9%, with incidences of 0.4% for hernia repair, 1.3% for cholecystectomy, 3.3% for appendectomy, 4.0% for total abdominal hysterectomy, and 3.9% for cesarean sections; The incidence of nosocomial infections was 2.7 infections per 100 discharged patients age 65 years or over and 0.9 infections per 100 discharged patients less than 65 years. Two hundred thirty-six microorganisms were cultured from 175 of the infections. Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, and Enterococcus were the most common gram-positive organisms. E. coli, Pseudomonas, Proteus, and Klebsiella were the most common gram-negative organisms cultured. The overall nosocomial infection incidence was much lower than reported rates for other groups of hospitals. These data have implications for the review and potential modification of complex guidelines and requirements for infection control in smaller rural hospitals.

Changes in the accuracy of administrative data for the detection of surgical site infections

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Brian T. Bucher ◽  
Meng Yang ◽  
Julie Arndorfer ◽  
Cherie Frame ◽  
Jan Orton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Diagnosis Codes ◽  
Infection Surveillance ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Ninth Edition

Abstract We performed a retrospective analysis of the changes in accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification (ICD-CM) diagnosis codes for colectomy and hysterectomy surgical site infection surveillance. After the transition from ICD-CM ninth edition to tenth edition codes, there was no significant change in the accuracy of these codes for SSI surveillance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document