Jocelyn Holland (Editor and Translator). Key Texts of Johann Wilhelm Ritter (1776–1810) on the Science and Art of Nature. (History of Science and Medicine Library, 16; Medieval and Early Modern Science, 13.) xiv + 713 pp., illus., indexes. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2010. $183 (cloth).Jocelyn Holland. German Romanticism and Science: The Procreative Poetics of Goethe, Novalis, and Ritter. (Routledge Studies in Romanticism, 13.) x + 222 pp., index. New York/London: Routledge, 2009. $125 (cloth).

Isis ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 785-786
Author(s):  
Joan Steigerwald
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Early Modern ◽  
History Of Science ◽  
Modern Science ◽  
German Romanticism ◽  
Early Modern Science ◽  
Science And Art ◽  
History Of

scholarly journals Making the History of Early Modern Science: Reflections on a Discipline in the Age of Globalization

2015 ◽  
Vol 70 (02) ◽  
pp. 307-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonella Romano
Keyword(s):  
Early Modern ◽  
History Of Science ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Modern Science ◽  
Early Modern Period ◽  
Homogeneous Field ◽  
Early Modern Science ◽  
Anthropology Of Science ◽  
Change Of Scale ◽  
History Of

Abstract What kind of history is the history of science? To what extent does the academic research labeled as such delineate a homogeneous field? What are the current challenges that it faces? The recent translation of Simon Schaffer’s works into French, along with the publication of his 2014 Marc Bloch Lecture in the Annales, provides the framework for this article’s historiographical reflection on the profound changes that have taken place within the discipline over the last thirty years, particularly within a French context. The analysis is twofold. First, it aims to trace how new approaches to the sociology and anthropology of science have reconfigured the boundaries of the discipline. Second, it considers the effect of the abandonment of one of its major historiographical paradigms by most of the scholars currently working on early modern science: the scientific revolution as the rise of scientific modernity, underpinned by a Eurocentric vision of the production of knowledge. Although most research on the early modern period now strives to distance itself from this narrative, it must also face new challenges and questions—in particular the role of science in the processes of globalization and the multiplicity of sites and social configurations that participate in this change of scale. These challenges point towards new methods and styles in the history of science and, more broadly, the social sciences.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document