Daily Disinfection of High-Touch Surfaces in Isolation Rooms to Reduce Contamination of Healthcare Workers' Hands

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 1039-1042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirisha Kundrapu ◽  
Venkata Sunkesula ◽  
Lucy A. Jury ◽  
Brett M. Sitzlar ◽  
Curtis J. Donskey
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Methicillin Resistant

In a randomized nonblinded trial, we demonstrated that daily disinfection of high-touch surfaces in rooms of patients with Clostridium difficile infection and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization reduced acquisition of the pathogens on hands after contacting high-touch surfaces and reduced contamination of hands of healthcare workers caring for the patients.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(10):1039-1042

Evaluation of a Sporicidal Peracetic Acid/Hydrogen Peroxide–Based Daily Disinfectant Cleaner

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1414-1416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Deshpande ◽  
Thriveen S. C. Mana ◽  
Jennifer L. Cadnum ◽  
Annette C. Jencson ◽  
Brett Sitzlar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Peracetic Acid ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Organic Load ◽  
Methicillin Resistant

OxyCide Daily Disinfectant Cleaner, a novel peracetic acid/hydrogen peroxide–based sporicidal disinfectant, was as effective as sodium hypochlorite for in vitro killing of Clostridium difficile spores, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and vancomcyin-resistant enterococci. OxyCide was minimally affected by organic load and was effective in reducing pathogen contamination in isolation roomsInfect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35(11):1414–1416

scholarly journals Differences in Hospital-Associated Multidrug-Resistant Organisms and Clostridium difficile Rates Using 2-Day versus 3-Day Definitions

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1417-1420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrijana Gombosev ◽  
Salah E. Fouad ◽  
Eric Cui ◽  
Chenghua Cao ◽  
Leah Terpstra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Prevention Programs ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

We surveyed infection prevention programs in 16 hospitals for hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci, extended-spectrum β-lactamase, and multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter acquisition, as well as hospital-associated MRSA bacteremia and Clostridium difficile infection based on defining events as occurring >2 days versus >3 days after admission. The former resulted in significantly higher median rates, ranging from 6.76% to 45.07% higherInfect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35(11):1417–1420

Perception vs Reality: Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carriage Among Healthcare Workers at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora E. Colburn ◽  
Jennifer Cadnum ◽  
Elizabeth Flannery ◽  
Shelley Chang ◽  
Curtis J. Donskey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Prevalence Study ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Knowledge Deficit

In a prevalence study of 209 healthcare workers, 18 (8.6%) and 13 (6.2%) carried methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in their nares or on their hands, respectively. However, 100 (62%) of 162 workers completing an associated survey believed themselves to be colonized, revealing a knowledge deficit about methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus epidemiology.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;37(1):110–112

scholarly journals Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Prevalence Among Healthcare Workers in Contact Tracings in a Dutch Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s316-s317
Author(s):  
Veronica Weterings ◽  
Heidi Kievits ◽  
Miranda van Rijen ◽  
Jan Kluytmans
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Index Case ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Secondary Case ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Carriage Rate ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Mlva Type

Background: In The Netherlands, the national guidelines on Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevention and control advocate screening of healthcare workers (HCWs) after unprotected exposure to MRSA carriers. Although this strategy is largely successful, contact tracing of staff is a time-consuming and costly component. We evaluated our contact tracing policy for HCWs over the years 2010–2018. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was performed in a Dutch teaching hospital. All HCWs who had unprotected contact with an MRSA carrier were included in contact tracing. When there had been a long period of unprotected admission prior to an MRSA finding, or when the index case was an HCW, the entire (nursing) team was tested. All samples of HCWs who were tested for MRSA carriage as part of contact tracing from 2010 until 2018 were included. A pooled nose, throat, and perineum swab was collected using the eSwab medium (Copan) and inoculated on chromID MRSA agar plates (bioMérieux) after enrichment in a broth. Molecular typing was performed using multiple-locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA). Results: In total, we included 8,849 samples (range, 677–1,448 samples per year) from 287 contact tracings (range, 26–55 contact tracings per year). Overall, 32 HCWs were colonized with MRSA (0.36%; 95% CI, 0.26%–0.51%). None of them developed a clinical infection. Moreover, 8 HCWs (0.10%; 95% CI, 0.05%–0.19%) were colonized with the same MLVA type as the index case and were detected in 6 of 287 contact tracings (2%). In 4 of 8 of these cases, a positive HCW was the index for undertaking contact tracing. In 3 of 8 cases, it was clear that the HCW who was identified in the contact tracing was the source of the outbreak and was the cause of invasive MRSA infections in patients. Notably, a different MLVA type as the index case was found in 24 HCWs (0.27%; 95% CI, 0.18%–0.40%) of whom 7 of 24 HCWs (29.2%) were intermittent carriers. Conclusions: This study revealed a sustained low MRSA prevalence among samples in contact tracing of HCWs over 9 years. Furthermore, it shows that when MRSA contact tracing is performed according to the national guideline, only 1 of 1,000 samples results in a secondary case. This is similar to the population carriage rate of MRSA in The Netherlands. More frequently, an unrelated strain is found. These findings raise questions regarding the efficacy of the current strategy to perform contact tracing after unprotected exposure.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

PREVALENCE OF METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS NASAL CARRIAGE IN HEALTHCARE WORKERS

2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1109-1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Ibarra ◽  
Tristan Flatt ◽  
Diane Van Maele ◽  
Aisha Ahmed ◽  
Jaime Fergie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Nasal Carriage ◽  
Methicillin Resistant

scholarly journals Nasal Carriage of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Healthcare Workers in University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 01-08
Author(s):  
Abubakar Adamu ◽  
Hamman Ibrahim Garandawa ◽  
AbZailani Sambo B ◽  
Mohammad Y ◽  
Aliyu Mohammad Kodiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Nasal Carriage ◽  
Methicillin Resistant

scholarly journals Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal cariage among hospitalized patients and healthcare workers in the Clinical center of Serbia

2014 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Cirkovic ◽  
Slobodanka Djukic ◽  
Biljana Carevic ◽  
Natasa Mazic ◽  
Vesna Mioljevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Comprehensive Analysis ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Clinical Center ◽  
Mrsa Strains ◽  
Healthcare Associated

The aim of the present study was to provide the first comprehensive analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage among patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) in the largest healthcare facility in Serbia. Specimens from anterior nares obtained from 195 hospitalized patients and 105 HCWs were inoculated after broth enrichment onto chromogenic MRSA-ID medium. In total, 21 of 300 specimens yielded MRSA. Among hospitalized patients, 7.7% were colonized with MRSA, and 5.7% HCWs were colonized with MRSA. Five out of 21 (23.8%) tested MRSA strains were classified as community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA), and four of them were isolated from HCWs. The remaining 16 MRSA strains had characteristics of healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA), and two of them were isolated from HCWs. The HA-MRSA strains isolated from HCWs were indistinguishable from HA-MRSA of the same cluster isolated from patients. This finding reveals the circulation of HA-MRSA strains between patients and HCWs in the Clinical Center of Serbia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document