The Prison Labor Problem in Tennessee: A Survey. U. S. Prison Industries Reorganization Administration

1938 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 739-740
1983 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 85-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Hawkins

1973 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil M. Singer

The current use of inmate manpower by correctional institu tions is a compromise between the inclinations of correctional officials and the preferences of society and thus achieves the ob jectives of neither group. Instead it imposes costs on inmates in the form of poor incentives and irrelevant jobs and creates an oversupply of labor for administrators. Private industry and labor are not truly protected from competition by prison industries, but prohibiting the sale of prison-made goods causes society's overall allocation of resources to be inefficient.


2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 540-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Scott ◽  
Frederick W. Derrick

Author(s):  
Golfo Alexopoulos
Keyword(s):  

This chapter presents the ways in which the Gulag administration dealt with its “inferior workforce.” Severely ill and disabled prisoners were considered as physically inferior (fizicheski nepolnotsennye), the defective labor force (nepolnotsennye rabsily), and the not-work-capable elements (netrudosposobnye elementy). They were unable to do the camp's basic work, which involved heavy physical labor in such sectors as construction, mining, and forestry. The so-called inferior workforce included both prisoners classified as invalids and those assigned to light labor. This segment of the Gulag labor force represented an enormous population of prisoners, and it grew significantly over the Stalin years. Given that a significant portion of the prison labor force was severely ill and disabled, the Gulag leadership sought ways to manage, conceal, and discard this enormous emaciated population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document