Prolongation of Hospital Stay and Additional Costs Due to Nosocomial Bloodstream Infection in an Algerian Neonatal Care Unit

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1066-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Lamine Atif ◽  
Fetta Sadaoui ◽  
Abdeldjallil Bezzaoucha ◽  
Chawki Ahmed Kaddache ◽  
Rachida Boukari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Neonatal Care ◽  
Additional Cost ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Nosocomial Bloodstream Infection ◽  
The Mean

Background.Previous studies from developed countries reported that nosocomial bloodstream infection (BSI) in neonatal care units (NCUs) increases length of stay and costs. However, no such information is available for Algerian NCUs.Objective.To evaluate the influence of BSI in neonates on additional charges and length of hospital stay.Design.Prospective, nested case-control study.Setting.The 47-bed NCU of the University Hospital of Blida, Algeria.Patients and Methods.A total of 83 neonates with BSIs (case patients) and 166 neonates without BSIs (control patients), admitted to the NCU during the study period (April 2004 through December 2007), were matched for sex, birth weight, length of NCU stay, and year of hospital admission. Each patient's length of stay in the NCU was obtained prospectively on daily rounds. The estimated cost of each NCU-day was provided by the hospital's finance department. The cost of antibiotics prescribed was provided by the hospital's pharmacy department.Results.The mean additional length of NCU stay for case patients, compared with control patients, was 9.2 days (24.3 vs 15.1 days). The mean additional cost of antibiotics was $546. The mean cumulative additional cost was $1,315.Conclusion.This study highlights the effect of BSI on extra costs for NCU patients, especially costs due to prolongation of hospital stay and increased antibiotic use, and suggests that NCUs in Algeria have a financial interest in reducing the rate of BSI.

scholarly journals Can point-of-care testing shorten hospitalization length of stay? An exploratory investigation of infectious agents using regression modelling

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 1606-1617
Author(s):  
Eliona Gkika ◽  
Anna Psaroulaki ◽  
Yannis Tselentis ◽  
Emmanouil Angelakis ◽  
Vassilis S Kouikoglou
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Laboratory Diagnosis ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact

This retrospective study investigates the potential benefits from the introduction of point-of-care tests for rapid diagnosis of infectious diseases. We analysed a sample of 441 hospitalized patients who had received a final diagnosis related to 18 pathogenic agents. These pathogens were mostly detected by standard tests but were also detectable by point-of-care testing. The length of hospital stay was partitioned into pre- and post-laboratory diagnosis stages. Regression analysis and elementary queueing theory were applied to estimate the impact of quick diagnosis on the mean length of stay and the utilization of healthcare resources. The analysis suggests that eliminating the pre-diagnosis times through point-of-care testing could shorten the mean length of hospital stay for infectious diseases by up to 34 per cent and result in an equal reduction in bed occupancy and other resources. Regression and other more sophisticated models can aid the financing decision-making of pilot point-of-care laboratories in healthcare systems.

scholarly journals The Epidemiology of Hospitalized Head Injury in British Columbia, Canada

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 605-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah A. Phillips ◽  
Don C. Voaklander ◽  
Colleen Drul ◽  
Karen D. Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
British Columbia ◽  
Head Injury ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Head Injuries ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
The Mean

Objective:This descriptive study seeks to identify the incidence rates of head injuries in a large Canadian province, given incident cases for a ten year period. It describes cases in terms of age standardized rates, demographics, and health care utilization.Methods:The analyses were done using descriptive statistics. Incidence rates were calculated using the direct method. The indicators of hospital resource utilization were: mean length of hospital stay, number of intensive care unit (ICU) stays, and mean length of stay in an ICU.Results:In the ten year period, British Columbia saw 48,753 admissions due to an incident head injury. The most common head injury diagnosis was an “Intracranial” injury. The year with the highest total age standardized rate was 1991/92 (174.18/100 000). The mean length of hospital stay was 7.4 days. Ten percent had an ICU stay and the mean length of stay was 4.4 days (± 4.8). The diagnosis with the longest mean length of stay was a “Fractured Skull” while of the top five E-code categories; “Motor Vehicle Traffic” had the highest mean length of stay with 12.2 days.Conclusions:Our study provides a much needed analysis of the incidence of head injuries in British Columbia. These rates can be compared to other provinces using the 2001 Canadian population as the standardized population. Our results indicate that there are certain “at risk” groups that warrant attention, in particular, younger men with lower socioeconomic standing. Indicators of health care utilization presented in the study should generate policy discussions.

Clinical improvement at Day 3 as factor influencing length of hospital stay and discharge of patients with schizophrenia

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1348-1348
Author(s):  
L. San-Molina ◽  
G. Rubio ◽  
I. Bernardo-Fernández ◽  
S. Miguélez-Fernández
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Clinical Improvement ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Medical Intervention ◽  
Symptom Improvement ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Symptom Outcome

IntroductionThe type of treatment used for patients with schizophrenia and an improvement at Day 3 can affect the length of stay and symptom outcome.ObjectivesTo determine the influence of improvement at Day 3 in the lenght of hospital stay and hospital discharge in the case of patients with schizophrenia admitted to acute units.MethodsA multicenter, naturalistic, retrospective study evaluating medical intervention in 1346 patients with schizophrenia in acute units in Spain.ResultsThe mean of hospital stay days was 23.3 (range 1–260 days). 49.5% of patients with improvement at Day 3 had a shorter length of hospital stay. 78.7% received treatment with antipsychotics prior to admission. The most common drugs were risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine. 99.8% and 99.7% were treated during hospital stay and on discharge, respectively. The drugs most commonly used were paliperidone ER, risperidone and olanzapine. 99.8% of patients with improvement measured by GCI at Day 3 and 100% with improvement at Day 5 had improved at discharge. The percentage of patients requiring use of benzodiazepines or physical/mechanical restriction decreased as the days passed.ConclusionsThe three most commonly used drugs during admission were effective, but the action of paliperidone ER is to be noted (its use increased from 4% prior to admission to 43% and 44% during hospital stay and on discharge, respectively). The results of this study appear to confirm that symptom improvement should be obtained as early as the first week of treatment to achieve a shorter hospital stay.

scholarly journals On the Role of Length of Stay in Healthcare-Associated Bloodstream Infection

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1213-1218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christie Y. Jeon ◽  
Matthew Neidell ◽  
Haomiao Jia ◽  
Matt Sinisi ◽  
Elaine Larson
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Risk Factors ◽  
Clinical Risk ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Design.We conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine the role played by length of hospital stay in the risk of healthcare-associated bloodstream infection (BSI), independent of demographic and clinical risk factors for BSI.Patients.We employed data from 113,893 admissions from inpatients discharged between 2006 and 2008.Setting.Large tertiary healthcare center in New York City.Methods.We estimated the crude and adjusted hazard of BSI by conducting logistic regression using a person-day data structure. The covariates included in the fully adjusted model included age, sex, Charlson score of comorbidity, renal failure, and malignancy as static variables and central venous catheterization, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit stay as time-varying variables.Results.In the crude model, we observed a nonlinear increasing hazard of BSI with increasing hospital stay. This trend was reduced to a constant hazard when fully adjusted for demographic and clinical risk factors for BSI.Conclusion.The association between longer length of hospital stay and increased risk of infection can largely be explained by the increased duration of stay among those who have underlying morbidity and require invasive procedures. We should take caution in attributing the association between length of stay and BSI to a direct negative impact of the healthcare environment.

Pilonidal Sinus: How to Choose Between Excision and Open Granulation Versus Excision and Primary Closure?

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 255-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perruchoud ◽  
Vuilleumier ◽  
Givel
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Incision And Drainage ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Primary Healing

Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure as treatments for pilonidal sinus. Subjects and methods: We evaluated a group of 141 patients operated on for a pilonidal sinus between 1991 and 1995. Ninety patients were treated by excision and open granulation, 34 patients by excision and primary closure and 17 patients by incision and drainage, as a unique treatment of an infected pilonidal sinus. Results: The first group, receiving treatment of excision and open granulation, experienced the following outcomes: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time; 72 days; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 40; average off-work delay, 38 days; and average follow-up time, 43 months. There were five recurrences (6%) in this group during the follow-up period. For the second group treated by excision and primary closure, the corresponding outcome measurements were as follows: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time, 23 days; primary healing failure rate, 9%; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 6; average off-work delay, 21 days. The average follow-up time was 34 months, and two recurrences (6%) were observed during the follow-up period. In the third group, seventeen patients benefited from an incision and drainage as unique treatment. The mean follow-up was 37 months. Five recurrences (29%) were noticed, requiring a new operation in all the cases. Discussion and conclusion: This series of 141 patients is too limited to permit final conclusions to be drawn concerning significant advantages of one form of treatment compared to the other. Nevertheless, primary closure offers the advantages of quicker healing time, fewer post-operative visits and shorter time off work. When a primary closure can be carried out, it should be routinely considered for socio-economical and comfort reasons.

EVALUATION OF LONGO’S HEMORRHOIDECTOMY AT HUE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

2012 ◽  
pp. 79-85
Author(s):  
Van Lieu Nguyen ◽  
Doan Van Phu Nguyen ◽  
Thanh Phuc Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Anal Pain ◽  
Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy ◽  
Fourth Degree ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Good For

Introduction: Since Longo First described it in 1998, Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy has been emerging as the procedure of choice for symtomatic hemorrhoid. Several studies have shown it to be a safe, effective and relative complication free procedure. The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of (SH) as a day cas procedure at Hue University Hospital. Methods: From Decembre 2009 to April 2012, 384 patients with third- degree and fourth-degree hemorrhoids who underwent Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy were included in this study. Parameters recorded included postoperative complications, analegic requirements, duration of hospital stay and patient satisfaction. Follow-up was performed at 1 month and 3 months post-operative. Results: Of the 384 patients that underwent a Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy 252 (65,7%) were male and 132 (34,3%) were female. The mean age was 47,5 years (range 17-76 years. Duration of hospital stay: The mean day was 2,82 ± 1,15 days (range 1-6 days). There were no perioperative complications. There was one case postoperative complication: hemorrhage; Follow-up after surgery: 286 (74,4%) patients had less anal pain, 78 (20,3%) patients had moderate anal pain, 3 (0,8%) patients had urinary retention; Follow-up after one month: good for 325 (84,6%) patients, average for 59 (15,4%) patients; Follow-up after three months: good for 362 (94,3%) patients, average for 22 (5,7%) patients. Conclusion: Our present study shows that Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy is a safe, reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and a faster return to unrestricted daily activity

Propensity-adjusted cost analysis of radial versus femoral access for neuroendovascular procedures

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016728
Author(s):  
Joshua S Catapano ◽  
Andrew F Ducruet ◽  
Stefan W Koester ◽  
Tyler S Cole ◽  
Jacob F Baranoski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Catheter Size ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Procedure Type ◽  
Angiographic Findings

BackgroundTransradial artery (TRA) access for neuroendovascular procedures is associated with fewer complications than transfemoral artery (TFA) access. This study compares hospital costs associated with TRA access to those associated with TFA access for neurointerventions.MethodsElective neuroendovascular procedures at a single center were retrospectively analyzed from October 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019. Hospital costs for each procedure were obtained from the hospital financial department. The primary outcome was the difference in the mean hospital costs after propensity adjustment between patients who underwent TRA compared with TFA access.ResultsOf the 338 elective procedures included, 63 (19%) were performed through TRA versus 275 (81%) through TFA access. Diagnostic procedures were more common in the TRA cohort (51 of 63, 81%) compared with the TFA cohort (197 of 275, 72%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.48). The TRA cohort had a shorter length of hospital stay (mean (SD) 0.3 (0.5) days) compared with the TFA cohort (mean 0.7 (1.3) days; p=0.02) and lower hospital costs (mean $12 968 ($6518) compared with the TFA cohort (mean $17 150 ($10 946); p=0.004). After propensity adjustment for age, sex, symptoms, angiographic findings, procedure type, sheath size, and catheter size, TRA access was associated with a mean hospital cost of $2514 less than that for TFA access (95% CI −$4931 to −$97; p=0.04).ConclusionNeuroendovascular procedures performed through TRA access are associated with lower hospital costs than TFA procedures. The lower cost is likely due to a decreased length of hospital stay for TRA.

565 POST-OPERATIVE WEIGHT LOSS AND OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ESOPHAGECTOMY

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Khaw ◽  
S Munro ◽  
J Sturrock ◽  
H Jaretzke ◽  
S Kamarajah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Failure To Thrive ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Postoperative Weight Loss ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract   Oesophageal cancer is the 11th most common cancer worldwide, with oesophagectomy remaining the mainstay curative treatment, despite significant associated morbidity and mortality. Postoperative weight loss remains a significant problem and is directly correlated to poor prognosis. Measures such as the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme and intraoperative jejunostomy feed have looked to tackle this. This study investigates the impact of these on mortality, length of hospital stay and postoperative weight loss. Methods Patients undergoing oesophagectomy between January 1st 2012—December 2014 and 28th October 2015–December 31st 2019 in a national tertiary oesophagogastric unit were included retrospectively. Variables measured included comorbidities, operation, histopathology, weights (pre- and post-operatively), length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and mortality. Pre-operative body weight was measured at elective admission, and further weights were identified from a prospectively maintained database, during further clinic appointments. Other data was collected through patient notes. Results 594 patients were included. Mean age at diagnosis was 65.9 years (13–65). Majority of cases were adenocarcinoma (63.3%), with varying stages of disease (TX-4, NX-3). Benign pathology accounted for 8.75% of cases. Mean weight loss post-oesophagectomy exceeded 10% at 6 months (SD 14.49). Majority (60.1%) of patients were discharged with feeding jejunostomy, and 5.22% of these required this feed to be restarted post-discharge. Length of stay was mean 16.5 days (SD 22.3). Complications occurred in 68.9% of patients, of which 13.8% were infection driven. Mortality occurred in 26.6% of patients, with 1.83% during hospital admission. 30-day mortality rate was 1.39%. Conclusion Failure to thrive and prolonged weight-loss following oesophagectomy can contribute to poor recovery, with associated complications and poor outcomes, including increased length of stay and mortality. Further analysis of data to investigate association between weight loss and poor outcomes for oesophagectomy patients will allow for personalised treatment of high-risk patients, in conjunction with members of the multidisciplinary team, including dieticians.

scholarly journals The independent patient factors that affect length of stay following hip fractures

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (7) ◽  
pp. 556-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Richards ◽  
A Glendenning ◽  
D Benson ◽  
S Alexander ◽  
S Thati
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Acute Hospital ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Factors ◽  
Mobility Status

Introduction Management of hip fractures has evolved over recent years to drive better outcomes including length of hospital stay. We aimed to identify and quantify the effect that patient factors influence acute hospital and total health service length of stay. Methods A retrospective observational study based on National Hip Fracture Database data was conducted from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2015. A multiple regression analysis of 330 patients was carried out to determine independent factors that affect acute hospital and total hospital length of stay. Results American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3 or above, Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) less than 8 and poor mobility status were independent factors, significantly increasing length of hospital stay in our population. Acute hospital length of stay can be predicted as 8.9 days longer when AMTS less than 8, 4.2 days longer when ASA grade was 3 or above and 20.4 days longer when unable to mobilise unaided (compared with independently mobile individuals). Other factors including total hip replacement compared with hemiarthroplasty did not independently affect length of stay. Conclusions Our analysis in a representative and generalisable population illustrates the importance of identifying these three patient characteristics in hip fracture patients. When recognised and targeted with orthogeriatric support, the length of hospital stay for these patients can be reduced and overall hip fracture care improved. Screening on admission for ASA grade, AMTS and mobility status allows prediction of length of stay and tailoring of care to match needs.

666 EARLY EXTUBATION AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY IS SAFE. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Serafim ◽  
Clara Santos ◽  
Marina Orlandini ◽  
Letícia Datrino ◽  
Guilherme Tavares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Early Extubation ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Anastomotic Fistula

Abstract   Esophagectomy has high morbidity and mortality, mainly due to pulmonary complications. Consequently, ventilatory support is a cornerstone in postoperative management. However, there is still no consensus on the timing for extubation. There is a fear that untimely extubation would lead to a high risk for an urgent reintubation. On the other hand, there is a risk for pulmonary damage in prolonged intubation. Thus, the present study aimed to compare early and late extubation after esophagectomy. Methods A systematic review was carried out on PubMed, Lilacs, Cochrane Library Central, and Embase, comparing early and late extubation after esophagectomy. The primary outcome was reintubation. Secondary outcomes included mortality; complications; pulmonary complications; pneumonia; anastomotic fistula; length of hospital stay; and ICU length of stay. The inclusion criteria were: a) clinical trials and cohort studies; b) adult patients (> 18 years); and c) patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy. The results were summarized by risk difference and mean difference. 95% confidence interval and random model were applied. Results Four articles were selected, comprising 490 patients. Early extubation did not increase the risk for reintubation, with a risk difference of 0.01 (95%CI -0.03; 0.04). Also, there was no difference for mortality −0.01 (95%CI -0.04; 0.03); complications −0.09 (95%CI -0.22; 0.05); pulmonary complications −0.05 (95%CI -0.13; 0.03); pneumonia −0.06 (95% CI-0.18; 0.05); anastomotic fistula −0.01 (95% CI -0.09; 0.08). In addition, there was no significant mean difference for: length of hospital stay −0.10 (95%CI -0.38; 0.1); and ICU length of stay 0.00 (95%CI -0.22; 0.22). Conclusion Early extubation after esophagectomy does not increase the risk for reintubation, mortality, complications, and lenght of stay.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document