Comparison of the Risk of Surgical Site Infection After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Open Cholecystectomy

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1103-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando M. Biscione ◽  
Renato C. Couto ◽  
Tânia M. Pedrosa ◽  
Mozar C. Neto
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Surgical Patient ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Space Infection ◽  
Organ Space Infection ◽  
Reduced Risk

We assessed the independent contributions of the surgical approach and other variables of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS) surgical patient component to the surgical site infection risk after cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with a lower overall risk of surgical site infection and a lower risk of incisional infection but not a reduced risk of organ-space infection, compared with open cholecystectomy. The contribution of most of the variables of the NNIS surgical patient component to the risk of surgical site infection depended on the depth of the infection.

scholarly journals Experience of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies in a Tertiary Care Hospital: a Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. E202043
Author(s):  
Aamir Hussain Hela ◽  
Haseeb Mohammad Khandwaw ◽  
Rahul Kumar ◽  
Mir Adnan Samad
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most commonly performed surgical procedure of digestive tract. It has replaced open cholecystectomy as gold standard treatment for cholelithiasis and inflammation of gallbladder.  It is estimated that approximately 90% of cholecystectomies in the  United States are performed using a laparoscopic approach.  The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in context to its complications, morbidity and mortality in a tertiary care hospital.  Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 1200 patients, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomies, during the period from January 2019 to December 2019, at Government Medical College Jammu J & K, India and necessary data was collected and reviewed. Results: In our study, a total of 1200 patients were studied including 216 males (18%) and 984 females (82%). The mean age of the patients was 43.35±8.61. The mean operative time in our study was 55.5±10.60 minutes with range of 45 – 90 minutes. Conversion rate was 2.6%. 2 patients were re-explored. Bile duct injury was found in 6 patients (0.5%).  Conclusions: Gallstone disease is a global health problem. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has now replaced open cholecystectomy as the first choice of treatment for gallstones. Gall stone diseases is most frequently encountered in female population. The risk factors for conversion to open cholecystectomy include male gender, previous abdominal surgery, acute cholecystitis, dense adhesions and fibrosis in Calot’ s triangle, anatomical variations, advanced age, comorbidity, obesity, suspicion of common bile duct stones, jaundice, and decreased surgeon experience. The incidence of surgical site infection has significantly decreased in laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to open cholecystectomy. In our study we could not find any case of surgical site infection.

scholarly journals A comparative study of open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cholelithiasis

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pramod Singh ◽  
Sumit Kumar Gupta ◽  
Mukesh Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
City Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Cholelithiasis is a major cause of morbidity among Indians with a female preponderance. Most of the cases of gallstones are asymptomatic. For a long time, open cholecystectomy (OC) used to be the surgical treatment for cholelithiasis. But with the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) there has been a gradual shift in the treatment with most surgeons preferring LC over OC. Apart from the benefits of decreased hospital stay, lesser postoperative pain and earlier return to normal activity LC are also cosmetically better as compared to OC. Longer operative time and increased incidence of biliary leakage are some pitfalls of LC in initial phase of surgical practice.Methods: A prospective study of 100 patients was carried out in the department of surgery in IQ city medical college and Durgapur city hospital, Durgapur between January 2017 and August 2017 with the aim of comparing open cholecystectomy with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Group A consisted of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery while Group B patients underwent open surgery for cholelithiasis.Results: Duration of surgery was longer in OC than LC (72.4min versus 44.7min.). Mean duration of post-operative pain was 18.3hrs in group A as compared to mean duration of 30.7hrs in group B patients. The mean period of post-operative hospital stay was 1.8 days in group A and 4.8 days in group B. Post-operative resumption of normal diet was possible in 2.1 days in OC while it took lesser time (1.2 days) in LC. The rate of surgical site infection was higher in OC as compared to LC.Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be recommended as first choice operative treatment for patients with cholelithiasis as it provides better cosmetic results, lesser pain, lesser post-operative hospital stay and fewer incidence of surgical site infection.

scholarly journals Why are we still using antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the low-risk groups? a review of literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 760
Author(s):  
Devajit Chowlek Shyam ◽  
Ranjit Chowlek Shyam ◽  
Donkupar Khongwar ◽  
Dathiadiam Tongper
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gallstone Disease ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Skin Preparation ◽  
Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Gallstone disease is one of the most common gastrointestinal conditions requiring surgery and more than 90% of cholecystectomies are done laparoscopically. The major complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are major bleeding, Bile duct injury, and wound infection or surgical site infection. The incidence of Surgical site infection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (0.4-1.13%) is significantly low compared to open cholecystectomy (3-47%) and the probable reasons are the smaller incision and the use of trocar along with almost nil to minimal wound contamination as compared to open cholecystectomy. Port site infection is a type of surgical site infection (1.8%) and the Umbilical port site is the most common site followed by the epigastric port site. In spite of the low-risk of surgical site infection, many surgeons still practice antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for low-risk patients. Antibiotic prophylaxis is a debatable topic in the low-risk group undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Meticulous preoperative skin preparation is one of the established local factors to prevent the occurrence of SSI.

Chlorhexidine–Alcohol Versus Povidone–Iodine for Surgical-Site Antisepsis

2021 ◽  
pp. 275-280
Author(s):  
Philipp Dahm
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Povidone Iodine ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Surgical Infection ◽  
Space Infection ◽  
Small Intestinal ◽  
Clean Contaminated ◽  
Organ Space Infection

This chapter summarizes the landmark trial that examined, in patients undergoing clean-contaminated surgery, how chlorhexidine–alcohol scrub compared to povidone–iodine scrub and paint in terms of infection rates. The trial included patients who were undergoing colorectal, small intestinal, gastroesophageal, biliary, thoracic, gynecologic, or urologic operations without substantial spillage or unusual contamination. Chlorhexidine reduced the rate of any surgical infection as well as that of superficial incisional infection, but no difference was observed for deep incisional infections, organ space infection, and sepsis from surgical-site infection.

scholarly journals Incidence of surgical site infection in dogs undergoing soft tissue surgery: risk factors and economic impact

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000233
Author(s):  
Jorge Espinel-Rupérez ◽  
Maria Dolores Martín-Ríos ◽  
Veronica Salazar ◽  
Maria Rosario Baquero-Artigao ◽  
Gustavo Ortiz-Díez
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Economic Impact ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Urinary Catheterisation ◽  
Organ Space Infection ◽  
Soft Tissue Surgery

ObjectivesTo determine (1) the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing soft tissue surgery at a veterinary teaching hospital and to study (2) and describe the main risk factors associated with SSI and (3) assess the economic impact of SSI.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingVeterinary teaching hospital.Participants184 dogs undergoing soft tissue surgery during a 12-month period (October 2013 to September 2014).Primary outcome measureSurgical site infection.ResultsOut of the 184 patients analysed, SSI was diagnosed in 16 (8.7 per cent) patients, 13 (81.3 per cent) were classified as superficial incisional infection, 2 (12.5 per cent) as deep incisional infection and 1 (6.3 per cent) as organ/space infection. The administration of steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (P=0.028), preoperative hyperglycaemia (P=0.015), surgical times longer than 60 minutes (P=0.013), urinary catheterisation (P=0.037) and wrong use of the Elizabethan collar (P=0.025) were identified as risk factors. Total costs increased 74.4 per cent, with an increase in postsurgical costs of 142.2 per cent.ConclusionsThe incidence of SSI was higher than the incidence reported in other published studies, although they were within expected ranges when a surveillance system was implemented. This incidence correlated with an increase in costs. Additionally new important risk factors for its development were detected.

58 Use of Abdominal Wall or Sucutaneous Drain to Reduce the Risk of Surgical Site Infections

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Mistry ◽  
B Woolner ◽  
A John
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Standard Operating Procedure ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Local Evidence ◽  
Audit Data ◽  
The Impact ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Introduction Open abdominal surgery confers potentially greater risk of surgical site infections, and local evidence suggests use of drains can reduce this. Our objectives were: Assessing local rates and risk factors of infections and if use of drains can reduce the rates of infections. Method Retrospectively looking from 01/01/2018 to 31/12/2018, at patients following laparotomy or open cholecystectomy. Data collection on demographics, smoking/alcohol status, heart, respiratory or renal disease or diabetes, steroid use and CEPOD status, as well as use of drain and the outcome of infection using inpatient and online patient records. Results 84 patients included, 25 had drains inserted. There were 13 documented cases of surgical site infection, all of whom had no drain post-op. Other parameters shown to be most prevalent in the patients with a surgical site infection include being current/ex-smoker (8/13), having heart disease (9/13), and elective procedures. Conclusions Aiming to reduce the risk of surgical site infections can improve morbidity and potentially mortality outcomes. Our audit data showed that there appears to be a benefit of inserting intra-abdominal or subcutaneous drains. We will create a standard operating procedure of all patient to receive drains post-op and then re-audit to assess the impact this has on infection rates.

scholarly journals Albumin and surgical site infection risk in orthopaedics: a meta-analysis

BMC Surgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peizhi Yuwen ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Hongzhi Lv ◽  
Chen Feng ◽  
Yansen Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Site Infection

scholarly journals Hubungan Kepatuhan Tim Bedah dalam Penerapan Surgery Safety Checklist dengan Infeksi Luka Operasi dan Lama Rawat Inap pada Pasien Seksio Sesarea di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Kabupaten Barru

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
Amiruddin Amiruddin ◽  
Ova Emilia ◽  
Shinta Prawitasari ◽  
Leo Prawirodihardjo
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
General Hospital ◽  
Surgical Patient ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Surgical Team ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay

Background: Surgical Patient Safety is essential to be carried out in operating theatre to prevent mortality and surgical complication. Patient safety is the basic principal in medical care and a major component of medical care management in hospital (WHO, 2009).Objective: To investigate association between SSC implementation among surgical team, surgical site infection and duration of hospital stay.Method: This is an analytical cross sectional study. Population of this study was women who underwent cesarean section with live birth in Barru general hospital during 1 December 2016-30 April 2017. This study was carried out in Barru general hospital, 137 samples met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data was obtained from medical records. Maternal outcome were duration of hospital stay, surgical site infection, and maternal mortality. Besides, this study also assesed knowledge and compliance of surgical team in implementation of SSC. The result of this study was analysed with computer statisctics analysis program.Result adn Discussion: One-hundred thirty seven patients met study criteria. Compliance of surgery team in SSC was 64%,. SSC was not implemented precisely in 36% patients (49 patients). There is no significant association between surgical team compliance with surgical site infection in cesarean section patients (p=0.078). A significant association was found between surgical team compliance with duration of hospital stay (p=0.006).Conclusion: The surgical team compliance in implementation of SSC was not yet optimal. An intensive socialization is needed to improve compliance of team in order that SSC implementation run promptly. This was part of efforts to reduce post operative complication and shorten hospital stay.Keywords: SSC, cesarean section, compliance, infection, duration of hospital stay

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document