Resource Consumption in the Infection Control Management of Pertussis Exposure Among Healthcare Workers in Pediatrics

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 412-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irini Daskalaki ◽  
Patricia Hennessey ◽  
Robin Hubler ◽  
Sarah S. Long
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Patient Use ◽  
Control Management

Objective.To assess consumption of resources in the infection control management of healthcare workers (HCWs) exposed to pertussis and to assess avoidability of exposure.Setting.Tertiary care children's medical center.Methods.Analysis of the extent of and reasons for HCW exposure to pertussis during contact with children with the disease, whether exposures were avoidable (because of the failure to recognize a case or to order or adhere to isolation precautions) or unavoidable (because the case was not recognizable or because another diagnosis was confirmed), and the cost of implementing exposure management.Interventions.Interventions consisted of an investigation of every HCW encounter with any patient who was confirmed later to have pertussis from the time of hospital admission of the patient, use of azithromycin as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) for exposed HCWs, performance of 21-day surveillance for cough illness, testing of symptomatic exposed HCWs forBordetella pertussis, and enhanced preexposure education of HCWs.Results.From September 2003 through April 2005, pertussis was confirmed in 28 patients (median age, 62 days); 24 patients were admitted. For 11 patients, pertussis was suspected, appropriate precautions were taken, and no HCW was exposed. Inadequate precautions for 17 patients led to 355 HCW exposures. The median number of HCWs exposed per exposing patient was 9 (range, 1-86 HCWs; first quartile mean, 2; fourth quartile mean, 61). Exposure was definitely avoidable for only 61 (17%) of 355 HCWs and was probably unavoidable for 294 HCWs (83%). The cost of 20-month infection control management of HCWs exposed to pertussis was $69,770. The entire cohort of HCWs involved in direct patient care at the facility could be immunized for approximately $60,000.Conclusions.Exposure of HCWs to pertussis during contact with children who have the disease is largely unavoidable, and management of this exposure is resource intensive. Universal preexposure vaccination of HCWs is a better utilization of resources than is case-based postexposure management.

A Prolonged Outbreak of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Burn Unit of a Tertiary Medical Center

1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 798-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Meier ◽  
Cheryl D. Carter ◽  
Sarah E. Wallace ◽  
Richard J. Hollis ◽  
Michael A. Pfaller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Persistent Problem ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center ◽  
Burn Unit

AbstractObjective:To report an outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in our burn unit and the steps we used to eradicate the organism.Design And Setting:Outbreak investigation in the burn unit of a 900-bed tertiary-care medical center.Outbreak:Between March and June 1993, MRSA was isolated from 10 patients in our burn unit. All isolates had identical antibiograms and chromosomal DNA patterns.Control Measures:Infection control personnel encouraged healthcare workers to wash their hands after each patient contact. The unit cohorted all infected or colonized patients, placed each affected patient in isolation, and, if possible, transferred the patient to another unit. Despite these measures, new cases occurred. Infection control personnel obtained nares cultures from 56 healthcare workers, 3 of whom carried the epidemic MRSA strain. One healthcare worker cared for six affected patients, and one cared for five patients. We treated the three healthcare workers with mupirocin. Subsequently, no additional patients became colonized or infected with the epidemic MRSA strain.Conclusions:The outbreak ended after we treated healthcare workers who carried the epidemic strain with mupirocin. This approach is not appropriate in all settings. However, we felt it was justified in this case because of a persistent problem after less intrusive measures.

Healthcare Workers' Knowledge and Attitudes About Pertussis and Pertussis Vaccination

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1284-1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
William P. Goins ◽  
William Schaffner ◽  
Kathryn M. Edwards ◽  
Thomas R. Talbot
Keyword(s):  
Pertussis Vaccine ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Knowledge And Attitudes ◽  
Personal Recommendation ◽  
To Receive

Objective.To determine knowledge and attitudes about pertussis and pertussis vaccination among healthcare workers (HCWs).Design.Self-administered, Web-based survey.Setting.Tertiary-care academic medical center.Participants.Medical center employees who participated in direct patient care were recruited to complete the survey through institutional e-mail.Results.Of 14,893 potentially eligible employees, 1,819 (12%) completed the survey. Most respondents (87%) did not plan to receive the pertussis vaccine. Intent to receive vaccination (which included recent history of vaccination) was associated with the following 4 factors: receipt of a physician recommendation for vaccination (odds ratio [OR], 9.01), awareness of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations for pertussis vaccination for HCWs (OR, 6.89), receipt of encouragement to be vaccinated from a coworker (OR, 4.72), the belief that HCWs may spread pertussis to patients and family (OR, 1.80). Two factors were negatively associated with intent to receive vaccination: the presence of children in the HCW's home (OR, 0.69) and employment as a nurse (OR, 0.59). Reasons cited by those who did not intend to receive vaccination included lack of a personal recommendation for vaccination (78%), receipt of vaccination as a child (51%), and perception that there was no significant risk for contracting pertussis (38%).Conclusions.Of the HCWs surveyed, only 13% intended to receive the pertussis vaccine. A perceived lack of recommendation for vaccination and inaccurate conceptions about pertussis and pertussis vaccination were cited as reasons HCWs did not intend to be vaccinated. Institutional pertussis vaccination campaigns should focus on the risks of healthcare-associated pertussis and new recommendations for pertussis vaccination.

scholarly journals 421. Effect of SARs-Cov-2 mRNA Vaccination in Healthcare Workers with Household COVID Exposure

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S311-S311
Author(s):  
Laura Selby ◽  
Richard Starlin
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Viral Shedding ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Significant Burden

Abstract Background Healthcare workers have experienced a significant burden of COVID-19 disease. COVID mRNA vaccines have shown great efficacy in prevention of severe disease and hospitalization due to COVID infection, but limited data is available about acquisition of infection and asymptomatic viral shedding. Methods Fully vaccinated healthcare workers at a tertiary-care academic medical center in Omaha Nebraska who reported a household exposure to COVID-19 infection are eligible for a screening program in which they are serially screened with PCR but allowed to work if negative on initial test and asymptomatic. Serial screening by NP swab was completed every 5-7 days, and workers became excluded from work if testing was positive or became symptomatic. Results Of the 94 employees who were fully vaccinated at the time of the household exposure to COVID-19 infection, 78 completed serial testing and were negative. Sixteen were positive on initial or subsequent screening. Vaccine failure rate of 17.0% (16/94). Healthcare workers exposed to household COVID positive contact Conclusion High risk household exposures to COVID-19 infection remains a significant potential source of infections in healthcare workers even after workers are fully vaccinated with COVID mRNA vaccines especially those with contact to positive domestic partners. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Prevention of Infections Associated With Permanent Cardiac Antiarrhythmic Devices by Implementation of a Comprehensive Infection Control Program

2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 492-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abraham Borer ◽  
Jacob Gilad ◽  
Eytan Hyam ◽  
Francisc Schlaeffer ◽  
Pnina Schlaeffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Relative Weight ◽  
Control Program ◽  
Cardiac Device ◽  
Infection Control Program

AbstractObjective:To implement a comprehensive infection control (IC) program for prevention of cardiac device-associated infections (CDIs).Design:Prospective before-after trial with 2 years of follow-up.Setting:A tertiary-care, university-affiliated medical center.Patients:A consecutive sample of all adults undergoing cardiac device implantation between 1997 and 2002.Intervention:An IC program was implemented during late 2001 and included staff education, preoperative modification of patient risk factors, intraoperative control of strict aseptic technique, surgical scrubbing and attire, control of environmental risk factors, optimization of antibiotic prophylaxis, postoperative wound care, and active surveillance. The clinical endpoint was CDI rates.Results:Between 1997 and 2000, there were 7 CDIs among 725 procedures (mean annual CDI incidence, 1%). During the first 9 months of 2001, there were 7 CDIs among 167 procedures (4.2%; P = .007): CDIs increased from 7 among 576 to 3 among 124 following pacemaker implantation (P = .39) and from 0 among 149 to 4 among 43 following cardioverter-defibrillator implantation (P = .002). Of the 14 CDIs, 5 involved superficial wounds, 7 involved deep wounds, and 2 involved endocarditis. Following intervention, there were no cases of CDI among 316 procedures during 24 months of follow-up (4.2% reduction; P = .0005).Conclusions:We observed a high CDI rate associated with substantial morbidity. IC measures had an impact on CDI. Although the relative weight of each measure in the prevention of CDI remains unknown, our results suggest that implementation of a comprehensive IC program is feasible and efficacious in this setting.

Costs of Management of Occupational Exposures to Blood and Body Fluids

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 774-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily M. O'Malley ◽  
R. Douglas Scott ◽  
Julie Gayle ◽  
John Dekutoski ◽  
Michael Foltzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Occupational Exposures ◽  
Body Fluids ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Infection Status ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Mean Cost

Objective.To determine the cost of management of occupational exposures to blood and body fluids.Design.A convenience sample of 4 healthcare facilities provided information on the cost of management of occupational exposures that varied in type, severity, and exposure source infection status. Detailed information was collected on time spent reporting, managing, and following up the exposures; salaries (including benefits) for representative staff who sustained and who managed exposures; and costs (not charges) for laboratory testing of exposure sources and exposed healthcare personnel, as well as any postexposure prophylaxis taken by the exposed personnel. Resources used were stratified by the phase of exposure management: exposure reporting, initial management, and follow-up. Data for 31 exposure scenarios were analyzed. Costs were given in 2003 US dollars.Setting.The 4 facilities providing data were a 600-bed public hospital, a 244-bed Veterans Affairs medical center, a 437-bed rural tertiary care hospital, and a 3,500-bed healthcare system.Results.The overall range of costs to manage reported exposures was $71-$4,838. Mean total costs varied greatly by the infection status of the source patient. The overall mean cost for exposures to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected source patients (n = 19, including those coinfected with hepatitis B or C virus) was $2,456 (range, $907-$4,838), whereas the overall mean cost for exposures to source patients with unknown or negative infection status (n = 8) was $376 (range, $71-$860). Lastly, the overall mean cost of management of reported exposures for source patients infected with hepatitis C virus (n = 4) was $650 (range, $186-$856).Conclusions.Management of occupational exposures to blood and body fluids is costly, the best way to avoid these costs is by prevention of exposures.

scholarly journals Detection of Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusand Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci on the Gowns and Gloves of Healthcare Workers

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 583-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham M. Snyder ◽  
Kerri A. Thorn ◽  
Jon P. Furuno ◽  
Eli N. Perencevich ◽  
Mary-Claire Roghmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Jejunostomy Tube ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

Objective.To assess the rate of and the risk factors for the detection of methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) on the protective gowns and gloves of healthcare workers (HCWs).Methods.We observed the interactions between HCWs and patients during routine clinical activities in a 29-bed medical intensive care unit at the University of Maryland Medical Center, an urban tertiary care academic hospital. Samples for culture were obtained from HCWs' hands prior to their entering a patient's room, from HCWs' disposable gowns and gloves after they completed patient care activities, and from HCWs' hands immediately after they removed their protective gowns and gloves.Results.Of 137 HCWs caring for patients colonized or infected with MRSA and/or VRE, 24 (17.5%; 95% confidence interval, 11.6%–24.4%) acquired the organism on their gloves, gown, or both. HCW contact with the endotracheal tube or tracheostomy site of a patient (P< .05), HCW contact with the head and/or neck of a patient (P< .05), and HCW presence in the room of a patient with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and/or jejunostomy tube (P< .05) were associated with an increased risk of acquiring these organisms.Conclusions.The gloves and gowns of HCWs frequently become contaminated with MRSA and VRE during the routine care of patients, and particularly during care of the patient's respiratory tract and any associated indwelling devices. As part of a larger infection control strategy, including high-compliance hand disinfection, they likely provide a useful barrier to transmitting antibiotic-resistant organisms among patients in an inpatient setting.

A Five-Year Study of Needlestick Injuries: Significant Reduction Associated With Communication, Education, and Convenient Placement of Sharps Containers

1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 265-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna J. Haiduven ◽  
Tammy M. DeMaio ◽  
David A. Stevens
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Educational Programs ◽  
Needlestick Injuries ◽  
San Jose ◽  
Communication Education ◽  
Santa Clara Valley ◽  
Control Department

AbstractObjective:To decrease the numbers of needlesticks among healthcare workers.Design:All reported needlestick injuries at Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California, were reviewed, analyzed, and tabulated by the infection control department yearly from 1986 to 1990.Setting:A 588-bed county teaching hospital in San Jose, California, affiliated with Stanford University.Participants:All employees of Santa Clara Valley Medical Center who reported needlestick injuries on injury report forms.Interventions:From April to December 1987, more needle disposal containers were added to as many patient care areas and as close to the area of use as possible. Results of 1986, 1988, 1989, and 1990 analyses were communicated yearly to all personnel, extensive educational programs were conducted in 1987 and 1988, and educational efforts continued in 1989 and 1990.Results:In 1986, there were 259 needlestick injuries at our institution, 22% (32) from recapping. After needle disposal containers were added to all patient care areas, needlestick injuries for 1988 totalled 143, a 45% decrease in the total needlestick injuries and a 53% decrease in recapping injuries. Communication of results to all areas of the hospital and educational activities were started in 1987 and continued through the next 3 years. In 1989, there were 135 needlestick injuries, a decrease of 6% from 1988; recapping injuries decreased 40% from 1988. In 1990, there were 104 needlestick injuries, a 23% decrease since 1989, and a 33% decrease in recapping injuries. The total number of needlestick injuries from 1986 to 1990 decreased by 60%, and those injuries from recapping decreased by 81% to 89%.Conclusions:We have continued to monitor needlestick injuries, communicate findings to all personnel, and include needlestick prevention in educational programs. We contend that more convenient placement of needle disposal containers, communication of tidings, and education do decrease needlestick injuries in healthcare workers.

Nosocomial Acquisition of Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusDuring an Outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Poutanen ◽  
Mary Vearncombe ◽  
Allison J. McGeer ◽  
Michael Gardam ◽  
Grant Large ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Appropriate Use ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Control Education ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospitals

AbstractObjective:The four hospitals assessed in this study use active surveillance cultures for methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and contact precautions for MRSA-positive patients as part of routine infection control practices. The objective of this study was to determine whether nosocomial acquisition of MRSA decreased in these hospitals during an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) when barrier precautions were routinely used for all patients.Design:Retrospective cohort study.Setting:Three tertiary-care hospitals (a 1,100-bed hospital; a 500-bed hospital; and an 823-bed hospital) and a 430-bed community hospital, each located in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Patients:All admitted patients were included.Results:The nosocomial rate of MRSA in all four hospitals combined during the SARS outbreak (3.7 per 10,000 patient-days) was not significantly different from that before (4.7 per 10,000 patient-days) or after (3.4 per 10,000 patient-days) the outbreak (P= .30 andP= .76, respectively). The nosocomial rate of MRSA after the outbreak was significantly lower than that before the outbreak (P= .003). Inappropriate reuse of gloves and gowns and failure to wash hands between patients on non-SARS wards were observed during the outbreak. Increased attention was paid to infection control education following the outbreak.Conclusions:Inappropriate reuse of gloves and gowns and failure to wash hands between patients may have contributed to transmission of MRSA during the SARS outbreak. Attention should be paid to training healthcare workers regarding the appropriate use of precautions as a means to protect themselves and patients.

Patterns in Patient Safety with Computerized Consult Management and Clinical Documentation

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-141
Author(s):  
Jason J. Saleem ◽  
Richard M. Frankel ◽  
Bradley N. Doebbeling ◽  
Emily S. Patterson
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Clinical Documentation ◽  
Unit Of Analysis ◽  
Safety Issues ◽  
Inpatient Ward ◽  
Units Of Analysis

Patient safety issues continue to be prevalent in delivering care with the electronic health record (EHR) and other health information technology (HIT) tools. Defining the unit of analysis for the study of clinical information systems is important based on the focus of the research. This study applies a conceptual framework with three levels of units of analysis for human-computer interaction (HCI) to identify and guide investigations at each level. Ethnographic observations and semi-structured, key-informant interviews were conducted with 40 healthcare workers across five primary care clinics, nine specialty clinics, and one inpatient ward at a tertiary-care Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). Two researchers recorded the interactions and interview responses of 40 healthcare workers related to their work with computerized consultations, clinical documentation, and the EHR in general. Patient safety issues from these data were categorized using three different units of analysis: EHR interface-, team coordination / workflow-, and organizational-levels. A total of 30 patient safety issues were identified; 17 emerged from the observation and interview data on computerized consults, 10 from the data on clinical documentation, and 3 were related to the EHR in general. Patient safety issues were organized by level of unit of analysis and mapped to specific methods that could be used for further investigation. Relevant concepts are discussed to help guide investigations at each level.

scholarly journals Impact of Bordetella pertussis Exposures on a Massachusetts Tertiary Care Medical System

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 708-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iva Zivna ◽  
Diana Bergin ◽  
Joanne Casavant ◽  
Sally Fontecchio ◽  
Susan Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bordetella Pertussis ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Close Contact ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Medical System ◽  
Secondary Case ◽  
Tertiary Care Medical Center ◽  
Outbreak Investigations ◽  
The Impact

Objective.To assess the impact of outbreaks of Bordetella pertussis infection on a tertiary care medical system.Design.Retrospective study.Setting.Academic tertiary care medical center and affiliated ambulatory care settings.Subjects.All patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) who were in close contact with patients with laboratory-confirmed cases of B. pertussis infection from October 1, 2003, through September 30, 2004.Intervention.Direct and indirect medical center costs were determined, including low and high estimates of time expended in the evaluation and management of exposed patients and HCWs during outbreak investigations of laboratory-confirmed cases of B. pertussis infection.Results.During this period, 20 primary and 3 secondary laboratory-confirmed cases of B. pertussis infection occurred, with 2 primary pertussis cases and 1 secondary case occurring in HCWs. Outbreak investigations prompted screening of 353 medical center employees. Probable or definitive exposure was identified for 296 HCWs, and 287 subsequently received treatment or prophylaxis for B. pertussis infection. Direct medical center costs for treatment and prophylaxis were $13,416 and costs for personnel time were $19,500-$31,190. Indirect medical center costs for time lost from work were $51,300-$52,300. The total cost of these investigations was estimated to be $85,066-$98,456.Conclusions.Frequent B. pertussis exposures had a major impact on our facility. Given the impact of exposures on healthcare institutions, routine vaccination for HCWs may be beneficial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document