The mass distribution of central stars (CPN) as derived by the Schönberner method (1981) M⊙ vs. age, v(exp) = const, for an enlarged local ensemble, as presented at the London Symposium, 1983, appears to be much narrower and more strongly peaked towards smaller masses than the one recently derived by Heap and Augensen (1987) (HA) using the same method, but IUE data and M⊙ (λ 1300) vs. age, corrected for individual v(exp). Whereas according to Schönberner 65% of all CPN have M < 0.64 M⊙, HA find only 44% below the same limit. We demonstrate that this discrepancy is entirely due to the fact, that HA use Daub and 0.9 × Cahn/Kaler distances, whereas Schönberner used 1.3 × CK. We list a number of arguments which favor the larger distances, especially the recent work by Méndez et al. (preprint, 1987) (Teff/g determinations) and investigations of Magellanic Cloud PN by Aller et al. (1987), Wood et al. (1987) and Barlow (1987) which all indicate a scale ≥. 1.4 × CK. If one uses Barlow's recalibration formula for optically thick PN, the distances for those - which mainly contribute to the massive CPN in the HA analysis - are increased so much as to remove most of them from the local ensemble. We thus obtain for the revised IUE ensemble 84% CPN with M < 0.64 M⊙, in better agreement with results for white dwarfs (70%) (cf. Weidemann, 1987).
The Mass Distribution of the Central Stars of Planetary Nebulae in the Large Magellanic Cloud