Laboratory-Based Surveillance for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci: Utility of Screening Stool Specimens Submitted for Clostridium difficile Toxin Assay

2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 160-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy L. Leber ◽  
Janet F. Hindler ◽  
Ellen O. Kato ◽  
David A. Bruckner ◽  
David A. Pegues

AbstractObjective:To study vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) gastrointestinal colonization prevalence in high-risk hospitalized patients and to assess the cost and utility of this laboratory-based surveillance.Setting:Large university teaching hospital.Design:Quarterly prevalence culture survey of 50 stool specimens submitted forClostridium difficiletoxin A assay from October 1996 through June 1999 (n=526). Screening culture survey of allC difficile-positive stool specimens from July 1998 through June 1999 (n=140).Patients:Specimens for analysis were collected from patients who were admitted to the hospital and who hadC difficiletoxin A testing ordered. Patient samples were excluded from analysis if they were obtained from patients not hospitalized at UCLA Medical Center, if theC difficiletoxin assay result was indeterminate, or if the patient was known to have previous VRE colonization or infection.Results:During quarterly surveillance, VRE was detected in 19.8%,C difficiletoxin A in 9.5%, and both VRE andC difficiletoxin A in 3.2% of stool specimens submitted forC difficiletoxin assay. Patients whose stool specimens were positive forC difficiletoxin A were significantly more likely than those whose specimens were negative to have VRE detected (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.5). Based on these findings, in July 1998, we began routine screening of allC difficile-positive stool specimens for VRE. From July 1998 through June 1999, 58 (41.4%) of 140 patients withC difficile-positive specimens had VRE newly detected in the stool. The combined cost of the two laboratory-based surveillance strategies was approximately $62 per VRE-positive patient identified and $5,800 per year.Conclusion:Quarterly surveillance of stool submitted forC difficileassay combined with screening allC difficile-positive stools is a cost-effective and efficient strategy for detecting VRE stool colonization among high-risk hospitalized patients. Such a laboratory-based surveillance should be included as part of a comprehensive program to limit nosocomial VRE transmission.

1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 342-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ellen Rafferty ◽  
Malkanthie I. McCormick ◽  
Lawrence H. Bopp ◽  
Aldona L. Baltch ◽  
Mary George ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd A. Lee ◽  
Donna M. Hacek ◽  
Kevin T. Stroupe ◽  
Susan M. Collins ◽  
Lance R. Peterson

AbstractObjective:To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and detection sensitivity associated with three active surveillance strategies for the identification of patients harboring vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) to determine which is the most medically and economically useful.Design:Culture for VRE from 200 consecutive stool specimens submitted forClostridium difficileculture. Following this, risk factors were assessed for patients whose culture yielded VRE, and a cost-effectiveness evaluation was performed using a decision analytic model with a probabilistic analysis.Setting:A 688-bed, tertiary-care facility in Chicago, Illinois, with approximately 39,000 annual admissions, 7,000 newborn deliveries, 56,000 emergency department visits, and 115,000 home care and 265,000 outpatient visits.Subjects:All stool specimens submitted to the clinical microbiology laboratory forC. difficileculture from hospital inpatients.Results:From 200 stool samples submitted forC. difficiletesting, we identified 5 patients with VRE in non-high-risk areas not screened as part of our routine patient surveillance. Medical record review revealed that all 5 had been hospitalized within the prior 2 years. Three of 5 had a history of renal impairment. The strategy that would involve screening the greatest number of patients (all those with a history of hospital admission in the prior 2 years) resulted in highest screening cost per patient admitted ($2.48), lower per patient admission costs ($480), and the best survival rates.Conclusion:An expanded VRE surveillance program that encompassed all patients hospitalized within the prior 2 years was a cost-effective screening strategy compared with a more traditional one focused on high-risk units.


1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 342-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ellen Rafferty ◽  
Malkanthie I. McCormick ◽  
Lawrence H. Bopp ◽  
Aldona L. Baltch ◽  
Mary George ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Beatriz Souza Dias ◽  
Juliana Yamashiro ◽  
Vera L. Borrasca ◽  
Valeska A. Stempliuk ◽  
Maria Rita E. Araújo ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to describe a pseudo-outbreak of C. difficile in a hospital, following a change in the method used to detect the toxin. In February 2002, there were two cases of CDAD and in March 7 occurred, coinciding with a change of the test (from detection of toxin A to toxin A/B). An outbreak was suspected. Active surveillance and education of staff were started. A CDAD case was defined as a patient with acute onset of diarrhea (³ three episodes of liquid stools) and a positive stool test. They were classified as hospital or community-acquired. Stool samples were also collected for C. difficile culture and isolates were typed using AP-PCR. From March 2002 through December 2003 there were 138 cases of CDAD: 70% were hospital-acquired and among the 30% with CDAD present on admission, most (81%) came directly from the community (50% had no history of hospitalization). Fifty-two percent of hospital-acquired CDAD and 94% of cases on admission had already used antibiotics. The incidence of CDAD in hospitalized patients during surveillance was 3.3 per 1000 patient-admissions. The incidence of CDAD present on admission was 6.1/1000 patients. Sixteen isolates were typed and presented 13 different profiles. In conclusion, the CDAD increase in our study occurred due to change in diagnostic methods and not due to an outbreak, as suspected initially. The incidence in hospitalized patients was much lower than in reported outbreaks. There were 13 molecular types suggesting that an outbreak did not occur. CDAD was largely community-acquired.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document