Effectiveness of Supplemental Reading Instruction for Second-Grade English Language Learners with Reading Difficulties

2003 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Linan-Thompson ◽  
Sharon Vaughn ◽  
Peggy Hickman-Davis ◽  
Kamiar Kouzekanani
ReCALL ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Chin Yeh ◽  
Hsiu-Ting Hung ◽  
Yu-Hsin Chiang

AbstractStudies suggest that the incorporation of online annotations in reading instruction can improve students’ reading comprehension. However, little research has addressed how students use online annotations in their reading processes and how such use may lead to their improvement. This study thus adopted Reciprocal Teaching (RT) as an instructional framework to support students’ reading comprehension progress and processes, facilitated by the use of online annotations. A total of 54 English language learners at a university were recruited to read with online annotations based on the RT procedure, namely predicting, clarifying, questioning, and summarizing. The data collected included the students’ scores on pre- and post-tests and their participation records in a collaborative learning environment. The results reveal that the students enhanced their reading comprehension after the intervention. Their reading processes were also analyzed, and the major differences between the groups making more and less progress were identified. Those who made more progress not only frequently reviewed their previously generated predictions, clarifications, questions, and summaries but also actively provided feedback to their peers in a reciprocal manner. Pedagogical implications and recommendations are discussed.


2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Linan-Thompson ◽  
Paul T. Cirino ◽  
Sharon Vaughn

Using an extant database, we examined three grade 1 criteria for identifying response to intervention (RTI) in English language learners (ELLs): (a) set benchmark criteria with a standard score above 95 (37th %ile) on both decoding and comprehension measures and a raw score of 40 or more correct words per minute (CWPM) on oral reading fluency; (b) discrepancy benchmark criteria, with performance on these measures at or above the mean of not-at-risk peers; and (c) discrepancy slope criteria, with growth during grade 1 on these measures at or above the mean of not-at-risk peers. The sample consisted of 81 students (41 intervention, 40 comparison) who were bilingual (Spanish/English) and were part of a supplemental reading instruction study during first grade. The three grade 1 criteria were evaluated in relation to a set benchmark criteria in grade 2. Results indicated that approximately 80% of the students did not meet any criteria in either year, but that the discrepancy slope criteria in grade 1 were most predictive of set benchmark criteria in grade 2. Recognizing that we applied highly stringent criteria, implications and issues are presented related to using RTI with ELLs to facilitate decision making about further intervention and referral for special education.


Active readers use several approaches to comprehend what they read before, during, and after reading. These readers use their previous experience or information to reflect about the subject, guess the text meaning and apply their skimming and scanning skills to predict the overall meaning. However, for a struggling English language learner (ELL) applying this skill may pose as a real challenge especially when the text level becomes more difficult and they are interpreting unfamiliar texts. One of the factors that may contribute to this problem is the absence of reading strategies. Hence, in this study, five 12-years old ELLs from a School in Johor Bahru were involved to record their usage of reading strategies before and after the reading strategy instructions. The study incorporates the quantitative design and the data collected was analysed using SPSS 16. ELLs answered a set of questionnaires from an adapted survey of reading strategies (SORS) developed by Mokhtari & Reichard (2002). The findings showed that despites their struggling in reading, these learners were able to apply some reading strategies to help them in reading English texts and marked differences in the frequency of reading strategies used at the end of the reading instruction in comparison to the early stage of the study.


2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Haager

This article provides a commentary on issues regarding the use of response to intervention (RTI) with English language learners (ELLs). The commentary draws on current literature on reading instruction, ELLs, RTI, and students with learning disabilities and highlights key points from the articles in this special issue. The discussion includes future directions for research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document