The Problem of Evil: Christian Concepts and the Book of Job. Albion Roy King

1954 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-67
Author(s):  
William A. Irwin
Keyword(s):  
Problem Of Evil ◽  
Book Of Job ◽  
The Problem Of Evil

scholarly journals Thomas Aquinas and Albertus Magnus on the Problem of Evil: Insights from their Commentaries on the Book of Job

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-42
Author(s):  
Franklin T. Harkins
Keyword(s):  
Thomas Aquinas ◽  
Problem Of Evil ◽  
Divine Providence ◽  
Compelling Evidence ◽  
Existence Of God ◽  
Book Of Job ◽  
Albert The Great ◽  
The Problem Of Evil

Abstract This article broadly considers the commentaries on Job of Thomas Aquinas and Albert the Great as offering a helpful theological alternative to some modern philosophical approaches to the ‘problem of evil’. We seek to show that whereas some modern philosophers understand evil as a problem for the very existence of God, whether and how God can coexist with evil was never a question that evil seriously raised in the minds of Aquinas and Albert. In fact, although the suffering of the just in particular led our medieval Dominicans to wonder about divine providence and our ability to know God in this life, they understood the reality of evil as compelling evidence for the existence of God.

God and Evil

2019 ◽  
pp. 137-150
Author(s):  
Lenn E. Goodman
Keyword(s):  
Problem Of Evil ◽  
Book Of Job ◽  
The Problem Of Evil

In Jewish sources, paradigmatically in the Book of Job, the problem of evil centers on the suffering of innocents and the seeming prosperity of the wicked. Central to my response in Chapter 5 is the recognition that the very idea of evil is parasitic on that of the good, just as evil itself preys upon goodness. The rise of life and thought and love, and the triumph of their survival, are the earnest of God’s blessing—presence of the Holy in this world and the attainability of holiness in this life by finite beings in the varied ways by which they seek it.

scholarly journals THE PRIEST, THE PSYCHIATRIST AND THE PROBLEM OF EVIL

2019 ◽  
pp. 101-140
Keyword(s):  
Depth Psychology ◽  
Final Section ◽  
Problem Of Evil ◽  
Carl Jung ◽  
Christian Theology ◽  
Historical Reconstruction ◽  
Book Of Job ◽  
The Problem Of Evil ◽  
Ultimate Question ◽  
Post War

This paper clusters around the problem of evil within the framework of depth psychology. The first part briefly introduces the narrative of the Book of Job as an example to contextualise how the ultimate question of God’s relation to evil remained unanswered and was left open-ended in Christian theology. The second part offers a historical reconstruction of the unresolved polemic over the nature of evil between Carl Jung and the English Dominican scholar and theologian Victor White (1902-1960). It explores their different speculations and formulations concerning evil and its psychological implications, until their final fall-out following White’s harshly critical review of Jung’s most controversial work on religion, Answer to Job. The final section of this paper introduces further reflections on a challenging theme that is no less resonant and relevant in today’s world of terrorism in the name of religion than it was in a post-war Europe struggling to recover from totalitarianism and genocide.

Psychology and the problem of evil

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashok Nagpal ◽  
Ankur Prahlad Betageri
Keyword(s):  
Problem Of Evil ◽  
The Problem Of Evil

The Problem of Evil and Replies to Some Important Responses

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 105-131
Author(s):  
Bruce Russell
Keyword(s):  
Problem Of Evil ◽  
Existence Of God ◽  
Strong Argument ◽  
Parallel Argument ◽  
The Earth ◽  
The Problem Of Evil ◽  
Argument From Evil

I begin by distinguishing four different versions of the argument from evil that start from four different moral premises that in various ways link the existence of God to the absence of suffering. The version of the argument from evil that I defend starts from the premise that if God exists, he would not allow excessive, unnecessary suffering. The argument continues by denying the consequent of this conditional to conclude that God does not exist. I defend the argument against Skeptical Theists who say we are in no position to judge that there is excessive, unnecessary suffering by arguing that this defense has absurd consequences. It allows Young Earthers to construct a parallel argument that concludes that we are in no position to judge that God did not create the earth recently. In the last section I consider whether theists can turn the argument from evil on its head by arguing that God exists. I first criticize Alvin Plantinga’s theory of warrant that one might try to use to argue for God’s existence. I then criticize Richard Swinburne’s Bayesian argument to the same conclusion. I conclude that my version of the argument from evil is a strong argument against the existence of God and that several important responses to it do not defeat it.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document