scholarly journals Antibiotic Dosing in Critically Ill Adult Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

2005 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 1159-1166 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Trotman ◽  
J. C. Williamson ◽  
D. M. Shoemaker ◽  
W. L. Salzer
Keyword(s):  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Antibiotic Dosing

scholarly journals Antibiotic Dosing for Critically Ill Adult Patients Receiving Intermittent Hemodialysis, Prolonged Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy, and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An Update

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Hoff ◽  
Jenana H. Maker ◽  
William E. Dager ◽  
Brett H. Heintz
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Intermittent Hemodialysis ◽  
Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Antibiotic Dosing

Objective: To summarize current antibiotic dosing recommendations in critically ill patients receiving intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT), and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), including considerations for individualizing therapy. Data Sources: A literature search of PubMed from January 2008 to May 2019 was performed to identify English-language literature in which dosing recommendations were proposed for antibiotics commonly used in critically ill patients receiving IHD, PIRRT, or CRRT. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All pertinent reviews, selected studies, and references were evaluated to ensure appropriateness for inclusion. Data Synthesis: Updated empirical dosing considerations are proposed for antibiotics in critically ill patients receiving IHD, PIRRT, and CRRT with recommendations for individualizing therapy. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review defines principles for assessing renal function, identifies RRT system properties affecting drug clearance and drug properties affecting clearance during RRT, outlines pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dosing considerations, reviews pertinent updates in the literature, develops updated empirical dosing recommendations, and highlights important factors for individualizing therapy in critically ill patients. Conclusions: Appropriate antimicrobial selection and dosing are vital to improve clinical outcomes. Dosing recommendations should be applied cautiously with efforts to consider local epidemiology and resistance patterns, antibiotic dosing and infusion strategies, renal replacement modalities, patient-specific considerations, severity of illness, residual renal function, comorbidities, and patient response to therapy. Recommendations provided herein are intended to serve as a guide in developing and revising therapy plans individualized to meet a patient’s needs.

Lacosamide Pharmacokinetics in a Critically Ill Patient During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Wieruszewski ◽  
Arnaldo Lopez-Ruiz ◽  
Robert C. Albright ◽  
Jennifer E. Fugate ◽  
Erin Frazee Barreto
Keyword(s):  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Critically Ill Patient ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Intermittent Hemodialysis ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Extracorporeal Removal

The objective of this study is to describe the pharmacokinetics of lacosamide in a critically ill adult during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). A 78-year-old male developed sepsis and acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery. He was initially treated with intermittent hemodialysis but developed nonconvulsive status epilepticus at the end of the first session and was subsequently initiated on CVVH. In addition to lorazepam boluses, levetiracetam, and midazolam infusion, he was loaded with lacosamide 400 mg intravenously and started on 200 mg intravenously twice daily as maintenance therapy. Noncompartmental modeling of lacosamide pharmacokinetics revealed significant extracorporeal removal, a volume of distribution of 0.69 L/kg, elimination half-life of 13.6 hours, and peak and trough concentrations of 7.4 and 3.7 mg/L, respectively (goal trough, 5-10 mg/L). We found significant extracorporeal removal of serum lacosamide during CVVH, which was higher than previously reported. This led to subtherapeutic concentrations and decreased overall antiepileptic drug exposure. The relationship between serum lacosamide concentrations and clinical efficacy is not well understood; thus, therapeutic drug monitoring is not routinely recommended. Yet, we demonstrated that measuring serum lacosamide concentrations in the critically ill population during continuous renal replacement therapy may be useful to individualize dosing programs. Further pharmacokinetic studies of lacosamide may be necessary to generate widespread dosing recommendations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document