scholarly journals “Skeleton Women”: Feminism and the Antiglobalization Movement

Signs ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 1741-1769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Eschle
2005 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 22-25
Author(s):  
Mae M. Ngai

A set of politics that uses rhetoric, imagery, music, and performance to promote interests that are distinctively and explicitly identified with the working class, Burgmann productively suggests, might revitalize the labor movement. Yet the effort to apply lessons from “identity politics” to “class politics” reproduces two problems in contemporary radicalism. First, by reducing the movements of ethno-racial minorities, women, and gays and lesbians to “identity politics” Burgmann underestimates those movements' claims to civil rights, human rights, socioeconomic improvement, and their general democratic nature. Second, the use of “class” to explain the antiglobalization movement is anachronistic and inadequate to the task of understanding radical politics today.


Federalism-E ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-63
Author(s):  
Matthew Hou

Federalism, in the Canadian experience, has been an adept form of political organization in response to the integrative economic processes of globalization. Canada’s ability to successfully transition from a domestic development economic model to a liberal free trade model without accompanying political shocks in the 1990s illustrates the resilience of its federal political structure to negotiate competing interests. Globalization’s economic impact, multiplied by innovative communication technology, influences every aspect of economic and political decision-making today.1 The accompanying reaction to globalization, anti-globalization, poses a range of challenges to extant economic and political methods of organization. The origins of the antiglobalization movement are more substantial than a general sense that globalization is fraying at the seams.2 Anti-globalization, to some extent, is an outgrowth of substantial resistance to a status quo that does not adequately manage the claims of the dissatisfied. To better understand the current movement, globalization’s principle processes will be analyzed to illuminate the three divergent strands of resistance.[...]


Author(s):  
John S. Dryzek

This chapter considers a category of green radicalism that focuses on green politics. Green radicalism is about political change targeted at social structures and institutions as well as consciousness change. This more overtly political emphasis is advanced by a number of movements and schools of thought whose degree of radicalism varies from eco-anarchists to ‘realo’ greens. The chapter begins with a discussion of different types of green politics, including green parties, social ecology, transition towns and new materialism, red and green, environmental justice, and environmentalism of the global poor. It also considers the antiglobalization movement, global justice, the Occupy Movement, and radical summits, as well as the discourse analysis of green politics. Finally, it looks at green politics in practice and emphasizes the uncertainty about the best way to practice green politics in the face of a seemingly recalcitrant and secure liberal capitalist political economy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 529-547
Author(s):  
Francis Dupuis-Déri ◽  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 687-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandy Smith-Nonini

Abstract This article uses the dilemma of climate change as an entry point to explore the utility of a complexity framework for a more comprehensive social science of environmental sustainability. A theory of complex adaptive systems (CAS) is especially appropriate for the Anthropocene, a newly proposed geological period defined around humanity’s impact on the biosphere. Aspects of complexity theory have been entering public consciousness through popular accounts of climate “tipping points” and “emergent” change—the risk that Earth’s climate could shift into a new pattern in a relatively short time period. Social structures, including capitalism, are complex systems, as are social movements. The paper reviews CAS research with special attention to applications in social ecology. It discusses two case studies of exemplary research on human management of environmental resources and one case study of the antiglobalization movement, all conceived within a complexity framework. The central argument is that complexity thinking will enhance social studies of sustainability and efforts to create a more resilient economy and biosphere.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document