Extracted‐Food Resource‐Defense Polygyny in Native Western North American Societies at Contact

2004 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 707-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel W. Sellen ◽  
Daniel J. Hruschka
Keyword(s):  
North American ◽  
Food Resource ◽  
Resource Defense ◽  
Resource Defense Polygyny

scholarly journals Evidence of resource-defense polygyny in an endangered subtropical bat, Eumops floridanus

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. e01289
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Braun de Torrez ◽  
Jeffery A. Gore ◽  
Holly K. Ober
Keyword(s):  
Resource Defense ◽  
Resource Defense Polygyny

scholarly journals Territoriality is just an option: allocation of a resource fundamental to the resource defense polygyny in the European wool carder bee, Anthidium manicatum (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)

2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karsten Seidelmann
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Mating System ◽  
Mating Behavior ◽  
Botanical Garden ◽  
Food Plants ◽  
High Plasticity ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Resource Defense ◽  
Resource Defense Polygyny ◽  
Anthidium Manicatum

Abstract The wool carder bee Anthidium manicatum is one textbook example of resource defense polygyny among solitary bees, known for intense male–male competition, forced copulations, and the extreme form of interspecific territoriality toward other flower visitors. This mating system depends on the spatial structure of the defended resource and requires several adaptations in males. The allocation of patches with host plants as well as male body size and phenology was analyzed over 3 years in the diverse habitat of a botanical garden. Anthidium manicatum males searched in groups up to 12 individuals a wide diversity of patches with various food plants of foraging females. Territories were established in small high-quality patches only. Males abandoned aggressive and territorial behavior in large patches. Available patches were occupied by males of the various body size fractions independently of each other according to patch profitability. The higher competitive weight of large males in small patches compared to spacious ones was balanced by an opposing correlation of patch profitability. Although the mating system in A. manicatum is clearly a resource defense polygyny, males were found to be plastic in their behavior, and territoriality was not consistently observed. Mate acquiring tactics, be they territory holder (bourgeois), sneaker, floater, or scrambler for mating, can be considered to be different behavioral phenotypes within one environmentally sensitive conditional strategy. Significance statement Territoriality is a rare and derived pattern in solitary bee mating behavior. In most cases of territoriality, males defend rendezvous places to meet freshly emerged, virgin females. While this type of mating behavior fits still into the framework of ancestral monandry of aculeate Hymenoptera, the continually polyandric resource defense polygyny found in the genus Anthidium is highly derived. Males occupy flower resources exploited for larval provisions and extort copulations from provisioning nesting females. Territoriality in Anthidium does not lead to a monopolization of females, the exclusion of many competitors from reproduction, and a reduction of sperm competition as is typical for resource-based mating systems. Contrary, Anthidium is a highly promiscuous species and both males and females are lifelong engaged in copulations with multiple mates. Also, the allocation of the resource fundamental to the defense polygyny was found to be more fairly balanced than expected. This study diversifies the mating system of anthidiine bees and demonstrates unusually high plasticity in the resource allocation of a territorial species.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document