Diagnostic Approaches to the Malformed Fetus, Abortus, Stillborn, and Deceased Newborn. Part A of Annual Review of Birth Defects, 1978.Mitchell S. Golbus , Bryan D. Hall , Natalie W. Paul , Florence DickmanPenetrance and Variability in Malformation Syndromes. Part B of Annual Review of Birth Defects, 1978.James J. O'Donnell , Bryan D. Hall , Natalie W. Paul , Marilyn P. OrlandoRisk, Communication, and Decision Making in Genetic Counseling. Part C of Annual Review of Birth Defects, 1978.Charles J. Epstein , Cynthia J. R. Curry, Seymour Packman , Sanford Sherman , Bryan D. Hall , Sue Conde Greene , Marcia C. MacDonald

1980 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-211
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Birth Defects ◽  
Annual Review ◽  
Part C ◽  
Diagnostic Approaches ◽  
Malformation Syndromes

scholarly journals What are patients doing with their mosaic embryos? Decision making after genetic counseling

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-137.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andria G. Besser ◽  
David H. McCulloh ◽  
James A. Grifo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Genetic Counseling

Somatic Mosaicism in a Patient with Gaucher Disease Type 2: Implication for Genetic Counseling and Therapeutic Decision-Making

2000 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirella Filocamo ◽  
Gloria Bonuccelli ◽  
Raffaella Mazzotti ◽  
Fabio Corsolini ◽  
Marina Stroppiano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Gaucher Disease ◽  
Somatic Mosaicism ◽  
Disease Type ◽  
Therapeutic Decision ◽  
Therapeutic Decision Making

Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis for Pediatricians

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 1010-1015
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Diagnostic Tests ◽  
Genetic Disorder ◽  
Genetic Diagnosis ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Know How ◽  
Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis ◽  
The Family

Pediatricians may be called upon to counsel a family in which prenatal diagnosis is being considered or in which there is a fetus with a genetic disorder. In some settings, the pediatrician may be the primary resource for counseling the family. More frequently, counseling may already have been provided by a clinical geneticist and/or obstetrician. However, because of a previous relationship with the family, the pediatrician may be called upon to review this information and to assist the family in the decision-making process. The pediatrician should be familiar with the principles of prenatal genetic diagnosis and know how to apply them to specific problems in genetic counseling, diagnosis, and management in clinical practice. At the same time, pediatricians should be familiar with resources available in their region for obtaining information about whether and how a specific disorder can be diagnosed and when and where to refer patients for prenatal genetic diagnosis. The technology of prenatal diagnosis is changing rapidly, and genetic consultants can assist pediatricians in the appropriate utilization and interpretation of the diagnostic tests that are available.

scholarly journals Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shira Mitchell ◽  
Eric Potash ◽  
Solon Barocas ◽  
Alexander D’Amour ◽  
Kristian Lum
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Rapid Growth ◽  
Online Publication ◽  
Annual Review ◽  
Publication Date ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Fairness Concerns ◽  
Machine Learning Models

A recent wave of research has attempted to define fairness quantitatively. In particular, this work has explored what fairness might mean in the context of decisions based on the predictions of statistical and machine learning models. The rapid growth of this new field has led to wildly inconsistent motivations, terminology, and notation, presenting a serious challenge for cataloging and comparing definitions. This article attempts to bring much-needed order. First, we explicate the various choices and assumptions made—often implicitly—to justify the use of prediction-based decision-making. Next, we show how such choices and assumptions can raise fairness concerns and we present a notationally consistent catalog of fairness definitions from the literature. In doing so, we offer a concise reference for thinking through the choices, assumptions, and fairness considerations of prediction-based decision-making. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Statistics, Volume 8 is March 8, 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document