Making Better Environmental Decisions: An Alternative to Risk Assessment. Mary O'Brien

2001 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 374-375
Author(s):  
Randall S. Rosenberger
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Environmental Decisions

Holistic Risk Assessment: An Emerging Process for Environmental Decisions

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Harvey ◽  
K.R. Mahaffey ◽  
S. Velazquez ◽  
M. Dourson
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Environmental Decisions

Risk and Precaution in Decision Making about Nature

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Aldred
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Precautionary Principle ◽  
The Precautionary Principle ◽  
Environmental Decision Making ◽  
Environmental Decisions ◽  
Environmental Decision

The normative bases for two fundamentally different approaches to environmental decision making are examined. First, orthodox “risk assessment.” In the conditions of (partial) uncertainty or ignorance prevailing in many environmental decisions, it is argued that CBA and similar forms of risk assessment should not be used in isolation. Second, the precautionary principle. Two conditions—broadly speaking, “uncertainty” and “particular threats”—seem especially relevant to determining the applicability of the precautionary principle. Gardiner’s “Rawlsian Core Precautionary Principle” is examined in detail. It features both conditions; an incommensurabilist interpretation of the latter is adopted. In short, precaution is justified in decision contexts involving both uncertainty and incommensurability. Since both uncertainty and incommensurability are matters of degree, there are intermediate cases to consider. The analysis argues that with “more” uncertainty, “less” incommensurability is required to justify precaution, and vice versa.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document