The Republic of Letters in America: The Correspondence of John Peale Bishop and Allen Tate. Thomas Daniel Young , John J. HindleRobert Penn Warren: Critical Perspectives. Neil Nakadate

1984 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 447-450
Author(s):  
Albert Gelpi
Keyword(s):  
Republic Of Letters ◽  
Allen Tate ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Critical Perspectives

The Republic of Letters in America: The Correspondence of John Peale Bishop & Allen Tate

1983 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
Martin McGovern ◽  
Thomas Daniel Young ◽  
John J. Hindle ◽  
John Peale Bishop ◽  
Allen Tate
Keyword(s):  
Republic Of Letters ◽  
Allen Tate ◽  
The Republic

The Republic of Letters in America: The Correspondence of John Peale Bishop & Allen Tate

1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
J. A. Bryant ◽  
John Peale Bishop ◽  
Allen Tate ◽  
Thomas Daniel Young ◽  
John J. Hindle
Keyword(s):  
Republic Of Letters ◽  
Allen Tate ◽  
The Republic

The Republic of Letters in America: The Correspondence of John Peale Bishop and Allen Tate

1986 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 350
Author(s):  
Daniel Aaron ◽  
Thomas Daniel Young ◽  
John J. Hindle ◽  
John Peale Bishop ◽  
Allen Tate
Keyword(s):  
Republic Of Letters ◽  
Allen Tate ◽  
The Republic

The Republic of Letters in America: The Correspondence of John Peale Bishop & Allen Tate.

1982 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 619
Author(s):  
Rayburn S. Moore ◽  
Thomas Daniel Young ◽  
John J. Hindle
Keyword(s):  
Republic Of Letters ◽  
Allen Tate ◽  
The Republic

Epilogue

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Oosterhoff
Keyword(s):  
Sixteenth Century ◽  
Republic Of Letters ◽  
Approach To Learning ◽  
European Culture ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Moment

The moment unfolded in this book unravelled in the following decades, partly because its students moved on, partly because Lefèvre took up a controversial role in the French Reformation. But his circle’s books continued to cultivate a particular approach to learning, and especially to the cultural place of mathematics, through the sixteenth century. This epilogue picks out a specialist strand of this influence in Lefèvre’s edition of Euclid, often reprinted and used in the republic of letters. A second strand is discernible in the pragmatic stance towards the utility of mathematics held by their heirs, Oronce Fine and Peter Ramus, which came to define European culture.

Experimentalists in the Republic of Letters

2003 ◽  
Vol 16 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 89-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Otto Sibum
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Revolution ◽  
Formative Period ◽  
Republic Of Letters ◽  
Experimental Knowledge ◽  
Natural Knowledge ◽  
Structural Problems ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Academic Recognition ◽  
Electro Magnetic

ArgumentWithin the Republic of Letters the art of experiment led to immense reorientation and an extensive redrawing of the enlightened map of natural knowledge. This paper will investigate the formative period of the exact sciences from the late eighteenth to the nineteenth century when the persona of the experimentalist as a scientific expert was shaped. The paper focuses on Moritz Hermann Jacobi’s experimental knowledge derived from his modeling of an electro-magnetic self-acting machine and the social and epistemological problems of its integration into traditional academic life. His struggle to achieve academic recognition and credibility for his experimental work reflects not just his individual quandary, but important structural problems of the historical development of experimental knowledge traditions and science in what has been called the “second scientific revolution.”

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document