On Variations in the Peak Luminosity of Type Ia Supernovae

2003 ◽  
Vol 590 (2) ◽  
pp. L83-L86 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. X. Timmes ◽  
Edward F. Brown ◽  
J. W. Truran
2016 ◽  
Vol 699 ◽  
pp. 012009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Uemura ◽  
Koji S Kawabata ◽  
Shiro Ikeda ◽  
Keiichi Maeda ◽  
Hsiang-Yun Wu ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 124 (912) ◽  
pp. 114-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
ShiAnne Kattner ◽  
Douglas C. Leonard ◽  
Christopher R. Burns ◽  
M. M. Phillips ◽  
Gastón Folatelli ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (09) ◽  
pp. 1850099 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Negrelli ◽  
L. Kraiselburd ◽  
S. Landau ◽  
E. García-Berro

Since Dirac stated his Large Number Hypothesis the space-time variation of fundamental constants has been an active subject of research. Here we analyze the possible spatial variation of two fundamental constants: the fine structure constant [Formula: see text] and the speed of light [Formula: see text]. We study the effects of such variations on the luminosity distance and on the peak luminosity of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). For this, we consider the change of each fundamental constant separately and discuss a dipole model for its variation. Elaborating upon our previous work, we take into account the variation of the peak luminosity of Type Ia supernovae resulting from the variation of each of these fundamental constants. Furthermore, we also include the change of the energy release during the explosion, which was not studied before in the literature. We perform a statistical analysis to compare the predictions of the dipole model for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] variation with the Union 2.1 and JLA compilations of SNe Ia. Allowing the nuisance parameters of the distance estimator [Formula: see text] and the cosmological density matter [Formula: see text] to vary. As a result of our analysis, we obtain a first estimate of the possible spatial variation of the speed of light [Formula: see text]. On the other hand, we find that there is no significant difference between the several phenomenological models studied here and the standard cosmological model, in which fundamental constants do not vary at all. Thus, we conclude that the actual set of data of Type Ia supernovae does not allow to verify the hypothetical spatial variation of fundamental constants.


2005 ◽  
Vol 201 ◽  
pp. 200-208
Author(s):  
Brad K. Gibson ◽  
Chris B. Brook

The methodology involved in deriving the Hubble Constant via the calibration of the corrected peak luminosities of Type Ia supernovae (SNe) is reviewed. We first present a re-analysis of the Calán-Tololo (C-T) and Center for Astrophysics (CfA) Type Ia SN surveys. Bivariate linear least squares and quadratic boot-strapped fits in peak apparent magnitude and light curve shape are employed to correct this heterogeneous sample of peak apparent magnitudes, resulting in an homogeneous (and excellent) secondary distance indicator: the so-called corrected peak luminosity. We next provide an empirical calibration for this corrected luminosity, using Cepheid-based distances for seven nearby spiral galaxies host to Type Ia SNe. Included in this sample is the spectroscopically peculiar SN 1991T (in NGC 4527), whose corrected peak luminosity is shown to be indistinguishable from that of so-called “normal” SNe. A robust value of the Hubble Constant is derived and shown to be H0=73±2(r)±7(s)km s-1 Mpc-1.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document