The "Argonautica" of Apollonius Rhodius. George W. Mooney

1913 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-372
Author(s):  
Henry W. Prescott
Keyword(s):  
Apollonius Rhodius

Apollonius Rhodius and Cyzicus

1912 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Edward Fitch
Keyword(s):  
Apollonius Rhodius

Catullus 64 and theArgonauticaof Apollonius Rhodius: allusion and exemplarity

1997 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 60-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Clare
Keyword(s):  
Large Degree ◽  
Central Importance ◽  
Apollonius Rhodius ◽  
Intertextual Connections

The sixty-fourth poem of Catullus, a work which has in times past been dismissed as contrived, is now appreciated precisely because it iscarefullycontrived. The majority of modern scholarship seems willing, implicitly or explicitly, to look upon the poem's intricacies and apparent contradictions as constituting part of its attraction, acknowledging that artifice does not necessarily preclude art.The complexities of poem 64 are contingent to a large degree upon its interaction with earlier poetic models. Structural devices of narrative are borrowed from a variety of sources; themes and scenes are delineated so as to reveal their full meaning through reader awareness of other works; literary allusions pervade the text. Perhaps the most salient intertextual feature of Catullus' epyllion is its interaction with previous literary treatments of the myth of Jason and Medea. In this regard, it has long been recognised that a poem of central importance for the reading of Catullus 64 is theArgonauticaof Apollonius Rhodius, and this present exploration of allusion in poem 64 will concentrate on the intertextual connections between 64 and its Hellenistic epic predecessor.

Critical Notes On Apollonius Rhodius

1969 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-284
Author(s):  
M. Campell
Keyword(s):  
Apollonius Rhodius ◽  
Critical Notes

Ardizzoni retains , but gives no reasons for doing so. Platt's correctionis technically easy, but the difficulty is, I feel, imaginary. I take . as asabsolute, = ‘joined the expedition’: so at 1. 90, 139—not, as LSJgive, ‘come next‘—and is dative of interest or advantage, as, for example, Od. 24. 400 , 21 209, 12.438, A.R. 2. 1092, Q,.S. 6. 119, 10. 24. here does not ‘govern‘ a dative any more than does, for examplel, at Od. 24. 400.And seems to me to be rather oddly placed.

scholarly journals ÉPICA, LÍRICA E TRAGÉDIA NAS ARGONÁUTICAS DE APOLÔNIO DE RODES

Organon ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (49) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Gontijo Flores
Keyword(s):  
Literary Genres ◽  
Apollonius Rhodius

This article intends to present a brief analysis of Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica 3.956-1007 – the meeting of Jason and Medea as well as Jason’s first speech – and to determinehow the crossing of literary genres (Kreuzung der Gattungen) can be traced in a allusivetexture that demands from its reader the knowledge of other works written in different genres(such as the Pindar’s coral and Sappho’s monadic lyric, and Euripides’ Medea) besides themany Homeric formulas. In such a generic clash, a refined building of ironical misreadingsslowly unveils itself with much more than a mere empty literary technique of Hellenistic taste.

The Callimachus Prologue and Apollonius Rhodius

1930 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-112
Author(s):  
W. M. Edwards
Keyword(s):  
British Museum ◽  
The Other ◽  
Original Text ◽  
Apollonius Rhodius ◽  
Obvious Consequence ◽  
The One

In making the following suggestions I have assumed the chronological possibility of allusions in the Aetia Prologue on the one hand to the quarrel with Apollonius Rhodius, and on the other to Arsinoe II. (obiit 271–270 B.C.). That such a combination is possible is maintained by Rostagni in Rivista di Filologia, 1928, pp. 1 sqq. The textual supplements offered here, while intended to support the double hypothesis, differ from his in some points; notably in regard to the question of where the allusion to Arsinoe is to be introduced into the text of Callimachus (see below). It need hardly be said that the supposed allusions to the queen and to the rival poet do not necessarily stand or fall together. In the case of the former it might not be altogether incredible (pace R.) that such an allusion should have been made after her death; whilst the most obvious consequence in regard to Apollonius would be that, if a date before 270 B.C. be accepted for the Prologue, his birth would have to be placed as early as possible—say, 295–290 B.C. However this may be, it is here sought to complete, in the above sense, certain passages in the Prologue (P.) with the aid of the British Museum Scholiast (S.). In regard to the latter a fresh study of the original text by the editor (Mr. H. J. M. Milne) has been utilized, to say nothing of his valuable suggestions and criticisms; in the case of P. the facsimile in Ox. Pap. XVII. is depended upon. The silence of S. on some of the supposed points may fairly be adduced in objection to them; but it may be noted that he does not comment on Πυγμαίων (P. 14), and that his exposition, where it can be checked, seems to be somewhat hasty and unbalanced. Further, we do not know what may have preceded the portion of his work which has survived.

The Argonauts

2021 ◽  
pp. 197-208
Author(s):  
Richard Hunter
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Apollonius Rhodius

This chapter considers the representation of Heracles in the Argonautic narratives of Apollonius Rhodius and Theocritus, Idyll 13. Particular attention is paid to the importance to the subsequent tradition of the divine Heracles of Odyssey 11 and to how the model of Heracles became important for ruler cult and Ptolemaic ideology. The chapter considers Heracles’ relations with Hylas, both of them being lost to the Argonautic expedition on the outward voyage, and to Heracles’ difference from the other Argonauts; whereas the expedition is presented as a model of Greek solidarity and homonoia, Heracles is both a civilizer and benefactor of mankind and a difficult, solitary hero who does not easily embody communal values.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document