scholarly journals [ITAL]Chandra[/ITAL] Observations of Cygnus A: Magnetic Field Strengths in the Hot Spots of a Radio Galaxy

2000 ◽  
Vol 544 (1) ◽  
pp. L27-L30 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Wilson ◽  
A. J. Young ◽  
P. L. Shopbell
2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 680-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. S. Artyukh ◽  
S. A. Tyul’bashev ◽  
P. A. Chernikov

2003 ◽  
Vol 588 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Rudnick ◽  
Katherine M. Blundell

1991 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 276-280
Author(s):  
M.C.H. Wright ◽  
R.J. Sault

AbstractWe describe a new software package, MIRIAD, for making multichannel images of multiple-field aperture synthesis observations. As an example of the use of the new software we present a map of the radio galaxy Cygnus A. We used the BIMA array to map Cygnus A at 86 GHz with 2.28 × 3.06 arcsec resolution in 3 fields centered on the central radio source and the radio hot spots in each radio lobe. The 3 fields were combined and deconvolved to find the positions and flux densities of the radio source components.


2002 ◽  
Vol 581 (2) ◽  
pp. 948-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Hardcastle ◽  
M. Birkinshaw ◽  
R. A. Cameron ◽  
D. E. Harris ◽  
L. W. Looney ◽  
...  

1967 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 381-383
Author(s):  
J. M. Greenberg

Van de Hulst (Paper 64, Table 1) has marked optical polarization as a questionable or marginal source of information concerning magnetic field strengths. Rather than arguing about this–I should rate this method asq+-, or quarrelling about the term ‘model-sensitive results’, I wish to stress the historical point that as recently as two years ago there were still some who questioned that optical polarization was definitely due to magnetically-oriented interstellar particles.


Author(s):  
Jean-Francois Lestrade ◽  
Robert L. Mutel ◽  
Robert A. Preston ◽  
Robert B. Phillips

Author(s):  
K. Mendelssohn ◽  
J. D. Babbitt ◽  
Frederick Alexander Lindemann

Until a year ago it was generally accepted that if a body is made supraconducting while in a magnetic field the lines of magnetic force were "frozen in," i. e ., whatever lines of force passed through the body at the time when it became supraconducting remained there afterwards, unaffected by any change in the external field, so long as the body was supraconducting. Meissner and Ochsenfeld, however, showed that this supposition was not true. They measured field strengths in the immediate neighbourhood of cylinders which had been cooled to supraconductivity in an external magnetic field, and found that the field of force was then of the same nature as that to be expected in the neighbourhood of perfectly diamagnetic bodies. Thus it appeared that when a body becomes supraconducting in a magnetic field the lines of force are all pressed out of the body, and the induction inside the body falls to zero. At the same time, however, these authors report on another experiment, the result of which appears to us not entirely in accordance with the assumption that the induction in the whole body became zero. They measured the field strengths inside and outside a hollow cylinder, after it had become supraconducting in a field perpendicular to its axis, and found again that the field strength outside was as if the cylinder were almost perfectly diamagnetic, but the field inside was appreciably the same as if the cylinder were non-supraconducting. We therefore made a number of experiments, hoping to find out more exactly the nature of the phenomenon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document